Study on the utility of IRS 1D LISS-III data and the classification techniques for mapping of Sunderban mangroves

Mangrove conservation and management is a stupendous task chiefly due to the inaccessibility and the hostile substrate conditions. Remote sensing technology serves as an important tool in providing fast, accurate and up-to-date baseline information on the status of mangroves. It is almost impossible to carry out conventional field surveys in these swampy areas. The present study aims at the classification and mapping of the mangroves in Sunderban Biosphere Reserve (SBR) in the West Bengal province of India using IRS 1D LISS-III satellite data. Different classification approaches, viz., on-screen visual interpretation, supervised and unsupervised classifications were tried. The study showed that four mangroves classes, viz., Avicennia, Phoenix, mixed mangroves, and mangrove scrub and eight non-mangrove classes could be delineated using all the three approaches. All the mangrove and non-mangrove classes were field verified and the overall accuracy as well as user’s and producer’s accuracies for each category were determined. It was observed that among the three approaches, on-screen visual interpretation yielded higher classification accuracy (91.67%) compared to supervised (79.90%) and unsupervised classifications (71.08%). The results obtained through on-screen visual interpretation showed that all mangrove categories together cover 23.21% of the total geographical area of SBR, of which the mixed mangrove category covers maximum area (18.31%). Among the non-mangrove classes, the waterbody occupies largest area (35.36%) followed by agriculture (34.51%).

[1]  S. P. S. Kushwaha,et al.  Evaluation of various digital image processing techniques for detection of coastal wetlands using ERS-1 SAR data , 2000 .

[2]  C. Corves,et al.  Final report - mapping the mangroves of Belize , 1990 .

[3]  J. Aschbacher,et al.  An integrated comparative approach to mangrove vegetation mapping using advanced remote sensing and GIS technologies: preliminary results , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[4]  M. Chaudhury Digital analysis of remote sensing data for monitoring the ecological status of the mangrove forests of Sunderbans in Bangladesh. , 1990 .

[5]  Julius T. Tou,et al.  Pattern Recognition Principles , 1974 .

[6]  P. Mumby,et al.  A review of remote sensing for the assessment and management of tropical coastal resources , 1996 .

[7]  C. S. Reddy,et al.  Assessment and monitoring of mangroves of Bhitarkanika Wildlife Sanctuary, Orissa, India using remote sensing and GIS , 2007 .

[8]  Michael Michael Hord,et al.  Digital image processing of remotely sensed data , 1982 .

[9]  J. R. Jensen,et al.  The measurement of mangrove characteristics in southwest Florida using spot multispectral data , 1991 .

[10]  P. Gang,et al.  The current status of mangroves along the Kenyan coast: a case study of Mida Creek mangroves based on remote sensing , 1992 .

[11]  H. Mohd-Lokman,et al.  Mangrove Mapping Using Landsat Imagery and Aerial Photographs: Kemaman District, Terengganu, Malaysia , 2002 .

[12]  J. Everitt,et al.  Using remote sensing techniques to distinguish and monitor black mangrove (Avicennia germinans) , 1989 .

[13]  James H. Everitt,et al.  Evaluation of Airborne Video Imagery for Distinguishing Black Mangrove (Avicennia germinans) on the Lower Texas Gulf Coast , 1991 .

[14]  Change detection studies in coastal zone features of Goa, India by remote sensing , 2006 .

[15]  P. Tomlinson The botany of mangroves , 1987 .

[16]  M. Swaminathan,et al.  Assessment of community-based restoration of Pichavaram mangrove wetland using remote sensing data , 2003 .

[17]  S. K. Singh,et al.  Assessment and monitoring of estuarine mangrove forests of Goa using satellite remote sensing , 2004 .

[18]  William De Genst,et al.  High-Resolution Vegetation Data for Mangrove Research as Obtained From Aerial Photography , 2002 .

[19]  Chandra Giri,et al.  Mangrove Forest Distributions and Dynamics in Madagascar (1975–2005) , 2008, Sensors.

[20]  Jorge López-Blanco,et al.  Mangrove vegetation assessment in the Santiago River Mouth, Mexico, by means of supervised classification using LandsatTM imagery , 1998 .

[21]  A. C. Ellis,et al.  The assessment of mangrove areas using high resolution multispectral airborne imagery , 1998 .

[22]  B. R. M. Rao,et al.  Mapping wetlands of the Sundaban Delta and it's environs using ERS-1 SAR data , 1999 .

[23]  J. Populus,et al.  Application of spot data to a base line ecological study of the mahakam delta mangroves east kalimantan indonesia , 1990 .

[24]  J. R. Jensen,et al.  Remote Sensing of Mangrove Wetlands: Relating Canopy Spectra to Site-Specific Data , 1996 .

[25]  C. Mcmillan,et al.  Black mangrove, Avicennia germinans, in Texas: past and present distribution. , 1981 .

[26]  J. Mas Monitoring land-cover changes: A comparison of change detection techniques , 1999 .

[27]  F. Lavenu,et al.  REMOTE SENSING DATA APPLIED TO MANGROVE OF KENYA COAST , 1986 .

[28]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[29]  S. G. Champion,et al.  A revised survey of the forest types of India. , 1968 .

[30]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[31]  J. Tobey,et al.  Remote Sensing of Mangrove Change Along the Tanzania Coast , 2003 .

[32]  A. C. Ellis,et al.  Remote sensing techniques for mangrove mapping , 1998 .

[33]  Ernesto N. Lorenzo,et al.  Assessment of mangrove forest deterioration in Zamboanga Peninsula, Philippines, using landsat mss data , 1979 .