Implicit Knowledge of Word Stress and Derivational Morphology Guides Skilled Readers’ Decoding of Multisyllabic Words

In oral language, morphologically conditioned regularities around stress assignment can be found in two classes of derivational suffixes, one that causes lexical stress to shift to the syllable immediately preceding the suffix (ACtive – acTIVity) and one that has no effect on stress (SILLy – SILLiness). In this study, adults listening to spoken “derived” nonwords judged as preferable those wherein the stress placement was consistent with morphological regularities of English. When reading nonwords and a set of nonwords derived from them, readers reliably assigned stress to the syllable predicted by the morphology. This effect was significantly associated with scores on standardized measures of word reading after controlling for nonword reading ability, showing that the relationship was not merely an artifact of decoding skill. These findings support the importance of the interface between morphology and suprasegmental phonology as a key factor in the way English-speaking readers approach multisyllabic, morphologically complex words.

[1]  S. Crain,et al.  Cognitive Profiles of Reading-Disabled Children: Comparison of Language Skills in Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax , 1995 .

[2]  C. Ethington,et al.  Fitting derivational morphophonology into a developmental model of reading , 2008 .

[3]  William E. Nagy,et al.  The acquisition of English derivational morphology , 1989 .

[4]  Lindsay Heggie,et al.  Prosodic sensitivity and morphological awareness in children's reading. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[5]  Linda Cupples,et al.  The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: Typicality effects and orthographic correlates , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  John O. Willis,et al.  Test of Word Reading Efficiency , 2014 .

[7]  J. Carlisle Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading , 2000 .

[8]  Larry A. Harris,et al.  Woodcock reading mastery tests: Woodcock, R. Circle Pines, Minn.: American Guidance Service, 1974. Form A or B: $18 , 1976 .

[9]  Linda D. Jarmulowicz,et al.  School-aged children's phonological production of derived English words. , 2006, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[10]  M. H. Kelly,et al.  Word Onset Patterns and Lexical Stress in English. , 2004 .

[11]  Isabelle Y. Liberman,et al.  Spelling Proficiency and Sensitivity to Word Structure. , 1985 .

[12]  J. Kirby,et al.  Processing of derived forms in high-functioning dyslexics , 2006, Annals of dyslexia.

[13]  J. Windsor The role of phonological opacity in reading achievement. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[14]  Maggie Bruck,et al.  Component Spelling Skills of College Students with Childhood Diagnoses of Dyslexia , 1993 .

[15]  Padraic Monaghan,et al.  Learning to Assign Lexical Stress during Reading Aloud: Corpus, Behavioral, and Computational Investigations. , 2010 .

[16]  S. Hay,et al.  Third graders' metalinguistic skills, reading skills, and stress production in derived English words. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[17]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Morphological Awareness and Learning to Read: A Cross-Language Perspective , 2006 .

[18]  Richard W. Woodcock,et al.  Woodcock reading mastery tests , 1987 .