A Comparison of Concrete and Formal Science Instruction upon Science Achievement and Reasoning Ability of Sixth Grade Students.

Several recent studies suggest concrete learners make greater gains in student achievement and in cognitive development when receiving concrete instruction than when receiving formal instruction. This study examined the effect of concrete and formal instruction upon reasoning and science achievement of sixth grade students. Four intact classes of sixth grade students were randomly selected into two treatment groups; concrete and formal. The treatments were patterned after the operational definitions published by Schneider and Renner (1980). Pretest and posttest measures were taken on the two dependent variables; reasoning, measured with Lawson's Classroom Test of Formal Reasoning, and science achievement, measured with seven teacher made tests covering the following units in a sixth grade general science curriculum: Chemistry, Physics, Earth Science, Cells, Plants, Animals, and Ecology. Analysis of covariance indicated significantly higher levels (better than 0.05 and in some cases 0.01) of performance in science achievement and cognitive development favoring the concrete instruction group and a significant gender effect favoring males.

[1]  Robert Karplus,et al.  Science teaching and the development of reasoning , 1977 .

[2]  Margaret C. Donaldson.  Children's Minds , 1978 .

[3]  Anton E. Lawson,et al.  The development and validation of a classroom test of formal reasoning , 1978 .

[4]  Anton E. Lawson,et al.  Encouraging the transition from concrete to formal cognitive functioning-an experiment , 1976 .

[5]  Anton E. Lawson,et al.  The influence of instruction on proportional reasoning in seventh graders , 1978 .

[6]  John R. Staver,et al.  The Effect of Reasoning on Student Performance on Different Sections of a Posttest. , 1984 .

[7]  John W. Renner,et al.  Concrete and formal teaching , 1980 .

[8]  A. Lawson,et al.  A quantitative analysis of responses to piagetian tasks and its implications for curriculum , 1974 .

[9]  Alan K. Griffiths,et al.  Limitations of Recent Research Relating Piaget’s Theory to Adolescent Thought , 1982 .

[10]  J. Piaget.  Science of education and the psychology of the child , 1970 .

[11]  A B Arons,et al.  Computer-Based Instructional Dialogs in Science Courses , 1984, Science.

[12]  J. Dudley Herron,et al.  Concrete and Formal Piagetian Stages and Science Concept Attainment. , 1978 .

[13]  John W. Renner,et al.  Results of two tenth-grade biology teaching procedures , 1983 .

[14]  R. Karplus,et al.  Intellectual Development Beyond Elementary School V: Using Ratio in Differing Tasks , 1974 .

[15]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  The effect of experiential science on development of logical thinking in children , 1975 .