Efficiency decomposition with shared inputs and outputs in two-stage DEA

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is an effective non-parametric method for measuring the relative efficiencies of decision making units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and outputs. In many real situations, the internal structure of DMUs is a two-stage network process with shared inputs used in both stages and common outputs produced by the both stages. For example, hospitals have a two-stage network structure. Stage 1 consumes resources such as information technology system, plant, equipment and admin personnel to generate outputs such as medical records, laundry and housekeeping. Stage 2 consumes the same set of resources used by stage 1 (named shared inputs) and the outputs generated by stage 1 (named intermediate measures) to provide patient services. Besides, some of outputs, for instance, patient satisfaction degrees, are generated by the two individual stages together (named shared outputs). Since some of shared inputs and outputs are hard split up and allocated to each individual stage, it needs to develop two-stage DEA methods for evaluating the performance of two-stage network processes in such problems. This paper extends the centralized model to measure the DEA efficiency of the two-stage process with non splittable shared inputs and outputs. A weighted additive approach is used to combine the two individual stages. Moreover, additive efficiency decomposition models are developed to simultaneously evaluate the maximal and the minimal achievable efficiencies for the individual stages. Finally, an example of 17 city branches of China Construction Bank in Anhui Province is employed to illustrate the proposed approach.

[1]  Peter F. Wanke,et al.  Two-stage DEA: An application to major Brazilian banks , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[2]  Jianfeng Ma,et al.  A two-stage DEA model considering shared inputs and free intermediate measures , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[3]  Zhongbao Zhou,et al.  Two-stage DEA models with undesirable input-intermediate-outputs $ , 2015 .

[4]  Thomas R. Sexton,et al.  Unoriented two-stage DEA: The case of the oscillating intermediate products , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Joe Zhu,et al.  A bargaining game model for measuring performance of two-stage network structures , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Jie Wu,et al.  Efficiency measures of the Chinese commercial banking system using an additive two-stage DEA , 2014 .

[9]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Measuring Information Technology's Indirect Impact on Firm Performance , 2004, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[10]  Joe Zhu,et al.  DEA models for two‐stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition , 2008 .

[11]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[12]  W. Cook,et al.  Sales performance measurement in bank branches , 2001 .

[13]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[14]  L. Seiford,et al.  Profitability and Marketability of the Top 55 U.S. Commercial Banks , 1999 .

[15]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Decomposing technical efficiency and scale elasticity in two-stage network DEA , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  Supply chain DEA: production possibility set and performance evaluation model , 2011, Ann. Oper. Res..

[17]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  A network DEA assessment of team efficiency in the NBA , 2014, Ann. Oper. Res..

[19]  Yongjun Li,et al.  Performance evaluation of participating nations at the 2012 London Summer Olympics by a two-stage data envelopment analysis , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  R. Färe,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY AND INTERMEDIATE PRODUCTS: A FRONTIER APPROACH , 1995 .

[21]  Malin Song,et al.  An extended aggregated ratio analysis in DEA , 2011 .

[22]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Best-performing US mutual fund families from 1993 to 2008: Evidence from a novel two-stage DEA model for efficiency decomposition , 2012 .

[23]  Stanley Zionts,et al.  Use of Data Envelopment Analysis in assessing Information Technology impact on firm performance , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[24]  Wenyu Yang,et al.  A bargaining game model for efficiency decomposition in the centralized model of two-stage systems , 2013, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[25]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Multiple Variable Proportionality in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2011, Oper. Res..

[26]  Herbert F. Lewis,et al.  Two-Stage DEA: An Application to Major League Baseball , 2003 .

[27]  Yongjun Li,et al.  DEA Models for Extended Two-Stage Network Structures , 2012 .

[28]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Programming with linear fractional functionals , 1962 .

[29]  C. A. Knox Lovell,et al.  Stratified Models of Education Production Using Modified DEA and Regression Analysis , 1994 .

[30]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[31]  Joe Zhu,et al.  DEA model with shared resources and efficiency decomposition , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  Liang Liang,et al.  Two-stage cooperation model with input freely distributed among the stages , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Malin Song,et al.  A ranking method for DMUs with interval data based on dea cross-efficiency evaluation and TOPSIS , 2013 .

[34]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..