Geometric morphometrics defines shape differences in the cortical area map of C57BL/6J and DBA/2J inbred mice

BackgroundWe previously described planar areal differences in adult mouse visual, somatosensory, and neocortex that collectively discriminated C57BL/6J and DBA/2J inbred strain identity. Here we use a novel application of established methods of two-dimensional geometric morphometrics to examine shape differences in the cortical area maps of these inbred strains.ResultsWe used Procrustes superimposition to align a reliable set of landmarks in the plane of the cortical sheet from tangential sections stained for the cytochrome oxidase enzyme. Procrustes superimposition translates landmark configurations to a common origin, scales them to a common size, and rotates them to minimize an estimate of error. Remaining variation represents shape differences. We compared the variation in shape between C57BL/6J and DBA/2J relative to that within each strain using a permutation test of Goodall's F statistic. Significant differences in shape in the posterior medial barrel subfield (PMBSF), as well as differences in shape across primary sensory areas, characterize the cortical area maps of these common inbred, isogenic strains.ConclusionC57BL/6J and DBA/2J have markedly different cortical area maps, in both size and shape. These differences suggest polymorphism in genetic factors underlying cortical specification, even between common isogenic strains. Comparing cortical phenotypes between normally varying inbred mice or between genetically modified mice can identify genetic contributions to cortical specification. Geometric morphometric analysis of shape represents an additional quantitative tool for the study of cortical development, regardless of whether it is studied from phenotype to gene or gene to phenotype.

[1]  C. Collins,et al.  Variation in the cortical area map of C57BL/6J and DBA/2J inbred mice predicts strain identity , 2005, BMC Neuroscience.

[2]  Christian Peter Klingenberg,et al.  Integration and modularity of quantitative trait locus effects on geometric shape in the mouse mandible. , 2004, Genetics.

[3]  S. Vadlamani On the Diffusion of Shape , 2007 .

[4]  C. Freitag,et al.  Rgs 2 gene polymorphisms as modulators of anxiety in humans? , 2006, Journal of Neural Transmission.

[5]  Fred L Bookstein,et al.  Computing the uniform component of shape variation. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[6]  F James Rohlf,et al.  Bias and error in estimates of mean shape in geometric morphometrics. , 2003, Journal of human evolution.

[7]  Christian Peter Klingenberg,et al.  Morphometrics and the role of the phenotype in studies of the evolution of developmental mechanisms. , 2002, Gene.

[8]  D'arcy W. Thompson On growth and form i , 1943 .

[9]  F. Zhou,et al.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor disrupts organization of thalamocortical somatosensory barrels during development. , 2004, Brain research. Developmental brain research.

[10]  Robert W. Williams,et al.  Complex trait analysis of gene expression uncovers polygenic and pleiotropic networks that modulate nervous system function , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[11]  William Valdar,et al.  Strategies for mapping and cloning quantitative trait genes in rodents , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[12]  C. Goodall Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape , 1991 .

[13]  S. Mcconnell,et al.  Genomic characterisation of a Fgf-regulated gradient-based neocortical protomap , 2005, Development.

[14]  Anastassia Stoykova,et al.  Gene networks controlling early cerebral cortex arealization , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[15]  Martin Styner,et al.  Statistical shape analysis of neuroanatomical structures based on medial models , 2003, Medical Image Anal..

[16]  Andrew P Morris,et al.  Genetic dissection of a behavioral quantitative trait locus shows that Rgs2 modulates anxiety in mice , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[17]  D. Purves,et al.  Individual variation and lateral asymmetry of the rat primary somatosensory cortex , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  Robert W. Williams,et al.  A new set of BXD recombinant inbred lines from advanced intercross populations in mice , 2004, BMC Genetics.

[19]  Takayoshi Inoue,et al.  Gene expression analysis of the late embryonic mouse cerebral cortex using DNA microarray: identification of several region- and layer-specific genes. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  D. Airey,et al.  Genetic Control of the Mouse Cerebellum: Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci Modulating Size and Architecture , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Voxel-based morphometric analysis using shape transformations. , 2005, International review of neurobiology.

[22]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Patterning centers, regulatory genes and extrinsic mechanisms controlling arealization of the neocortex , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[23]  E. Grove,et al.  Area and layer patterning in the developing cerebral cortex , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[24]  M. Wong-Riley Changes in the visual system of monocularly sutured or enucleated cats demonstrable with cytochrome oxidase histochemistry , 1979, Brain Research.

[25]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Extensions of the Procrustes Method for the Optimal Superimposition of Landmarks , 1990 .

[26]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Geometric morphometrics of corpus callosum and subcortical structures in the fetal-alcohol-affected brain. , 2001, Teratology.

[27]  Robert W. Williams,et al.  Genetic sources of individual differences in the cerebellum , 2002, The Cerebellum.

[28]  E. Welker,et al.  Variation in pattern of mystacial vibrissae in mice. A quantitative study of ICR stock and several inbred strains. , 1984, The Journal of heredity.

[29]  Tadashi Hamasaki,et al.  EMX2 Regulates Sizes and Positioning of the Primary Sensory and Motor Areas in Neocortex by Direct Specification of Cortical Progenitors , 2004, Neuron.

[30]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Image processing and analysis , 2005 .

[31]  E. Grove,et al.  Generating the cerebral cortical area map. , 2003, Annual review of neuroscience.

[32]  Lu Lu,et al.  Genetic analysis of barrel field size in the first somatosensory area (SI) in inbred and recombinant inbred strains of mice , 2005, Somatosensory & motor research.

[33]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  A geometric morphometric assessment of change in midline brain structural shape following a first episode of schizophrenia , 2000, Biological Psychiatry.