Visual search for object categories is predicted by the representational architecture of high-level visual cortex.

Visual search is a ubiquitous visual behavior, and efficient search is essential for survival. Different cognitive models have explained the speed and accuracy of search based either on the dynamics of attention or on similarity of item representations. Here, we examined the extent to which performance on a visual search task can be predicted from the stable representational architecture of the visual system, independent of attentional dynamics. Participants performed a visual search task with 28 conditions reflecting different pairs of categories (e.g., searching for a face among cars, body among hammers, etc.). The time it took participants to find the target item varied as a function of category combination. In a separate group of participants, we measured the neural responses to these object categories when items were presented in isolation. Using representational similarity analysis, we then examined whether the similarity of neural responses across different subdivisions of the visual system had the requisite structure needed to predict visual search performance. Overall, we found strong brain/behavior correlations across most of the higher-level visual system, including both the ventral and dorsal pathways when considering both macroscale sectors as well as smaller mesoscale regions. These results suggest that visual search for real-world object categories is well predicted by the stable, task-independent architecture of the visual system. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Here, we ask which neural regions have neural response patterns that correlate with behavioral performance in a visual processing task. We found that the representational structure across all of high-level visual cortex has the requisite structure to predict behavior. Furthermore, when directly comparing different neural regions, we found that they all had highly similar category-level representational structures. These results point to a ubiquitous and uniform representational structure in high-level visual cortex underlying visual object processing.

[1]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Reaction Time for Object Categorization Is Predicted by Representational Distance , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  E. Spelke,et al.  Infants' knowledge of object motion and human action. , 1995 .

[3]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  The Occipital Place Area Is Causally and Selectively Involved in Scene Perception , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Daria Proklova,et al.  Disentangling Representations of Object Shape and Object Category in Human Visual Cortex: The Animate–Inanimate Distinction , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[7]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  J. Gallant,et al.  Attention to Stimulus Features Shifts Spectral Tuning of V4 Neurons during Natural Vision , 2008, Neuron.

[9]  S. Kastner,et al.  A neural basis for real-world visual search in human occipitotemporal cortex , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Paige E. Scalf,et al.  Competition explains limited attention and perceptual resources: implications for perceptual load and dilution theories , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[11]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .

[12]  Katharina N. Seidl,et al.  Neural Evidence for Distracter Suppression during Visual Search in Real-World Scenes , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Explaining the hierarchy of visual representational geometries by remixing of features from many computational vision models , 2014 .

[14]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Conceptual Object Representations in Human Anterior Temporal Cortex , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas , 2009, Nature.

[16]  C. Spearman CORRELATION CALCULATED FROM FAULTY DATA , 1910 .

[17]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  N. Kriegeskorte,et al.  Author ' s personal copy Representational geometry : integrating cognition , computation , and the brain , 2013 .

[19]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[20]  George A. Alvarez,et al.  Visual Awareness Is Limited by the Representational Architecture of the Visual System , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  E. Miller,et al.  Response to Comment on "Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Control of Attention in the Prefrontal and Posterior Parietal Cortices" , 2007, Science.

[22]  Paul E. Downing,et al.  Division of Labor between Lateral and Ventral Extrastriate Representations of Faces, Bodies, and Objects , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Stefania Bracci,et al.  Dissociations and associations between shape and category representations in the two visual pathways. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[24]  W. Brown SOME EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS IN THE CORRELATION OF MENTAL ABILITIES1 , 1910 .

[25]  B. Mesquita,et al.  Adjustment to Chronic Diseases and Terminal Illness Health Psychology : Psychological Adjustment to Chronic Disease , 2006 .

[26]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Contribution of striate inputs to the visuospatial functions of parieto-preoccipital cortex in monkeys , 1982, Behavioural Brain Research.

[27]  Sébastien M. Crouzet,et al.  Fast saccades toward faces: face detection in just 100 ms. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[28]  John Duncan,et al.  A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex , 1993, Nature.

[29]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[30]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  M. Eimer The neural basis of attentional control in visual search , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  N. Kanwisher Functional specificity in the human brain: A window into the functional architecture of the mind , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Multivariate Patterns in Object-Selective Cortex Dissociate Perceptual and Physical Shape Similarity , 2008, PLoS biology.

[35]  P. Downing,et al.  Within‐subject reproducibility of category‐specific visual activation with functional MRI , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[36]  E. Williams Experimental Designs Balanced for the Estimation of Residual Effects of Treatments , 1949 .

[37]  Jack L. Gallant,et al.  A Continuous Semantic Space Describes the Representation of Thousands of Object and Action Categories across the Human Brain , 2012, Neuron.

[38]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[39]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Matching Categorical Object Representations in Inferior Temporal Cortex of Man and Monkey , 2008, Neuron.

[40]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[41]  Shaul Hochstein,et al.  At first sight: A high-level pop out effect for faces , 2005, Vision Research.

[42]  E. Rosch,et al.  Categorization of Natural Objects , 1981 .

[43]  Alexander G. Huth,et al.  Attention During Natural Vision Warps Semantic Representation Across the Human Brain , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Information-based functional brain mapping. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  S. Treue Visual attention: the where, what, how and why of saliency , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[46]  People v. objects: a reply to Rakison and Cicchino , 2004, Cognition.

[47]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[48]  N. Kriegeskorte,et al.  Visual features as stepping stones toward semantics: Explaining object similarity in IT and perception with non-negative least squares , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Perceived Shape Similarity among Unfamiliar Objects and the Organization of the Human Object Vision Pathway , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  Paul Bloom,et al.  Do 5-month-old infants see humans as material objects? , 2004, Cognition.

[51]  S. Kastner,et al.  The Functional Neuroanatomy of Object Agnosia: A Case Study , 2010, Neuron.

[52]  James J. DiCarlo,et al.  How Does the Brain Solve Visual Object Recognition? , 2012, Neuron.

[53]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Tripartite Organization of the Ventral Stream by Animacy and Object Size , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  Maria C Romero,et al.  Coding of Shape Features in the Macaque Anterior Intraparietal Area , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  R. VanRullen On second glance: Still no high-level pop-out effect for faces , 2006, Vision Research.

[56]  R. Goebel,et al.  Human Object-Similarity Judgments Reflect and Transcend the Primate-IT Object Representation , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[57]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Situating visual search , 2011, Vision Research.

[58]  Yaoda Xu,et al.  The Role of Transverse Occipital Sulcus in Scene Perception and Its Relationship to Object Individuation in Inferior Intraparietal Sulcus , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[59]  J. S. Guntupalli,et al.  The Representation of Biological Classes in the Human Brain , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[60]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Representational Similarity of Body Parts in Human Occipitotemporal Cortex , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[61]  Tal Makovski,et al.  The visual attractor illusion. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[62]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Domain-Specific Knowledge Systems in the Brain: The Animate-Inanimate Distinction , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[63]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Stimulus-Specific Delay Activity in Human Primary Visual Cortex , 2022 .

[64]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Just Say No: How Are Visual Searches Terminated When There Is No Target Present? , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[65]  Gregory J Zelinsky,et al.  Searching for Category-Consistent Features , 2016, Psychological science.

[66]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Concepts and categories: a cognitive neuropsychological perspective. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[67]  S. Edelman,et al.  Toward direct visualization of the internal shape representation space by fMRI , 1998, Psychobiology.

[68]  Su Keun Jeong,et al.  Behaviorally Relevant Abstract Object Identity Representation in the Human Parietal Cortex , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[69]  L. Reddy,et al.  Category selectivity in the ventral visual pathway confers robustness to clutter and diverted attention , 2010 .

[70]  B. Wandell Computational neuroimaging of human visual cortex. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[71]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.

[72]  A. Ishai,et al.  Recollection- and Familiarity-Based Decisions Reflect Memory Strength , 2008, Frontiers in systems neuroscience.

[73]  Greg O. Horne,et al.  Controlling low-level image properties: The SHINE toolbox , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[74]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[75]  Michael A. Cohen,et al.  Processing multiple visual objects is limited by overlap in neural channels , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[76]  Bodo Winter,et al.  Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications , 2013, ArXiv.

[77]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.