Parallel Repetition for the GHZ Game: A Simpler Proof

We give a new proof of the fact that the parallel repetition of the (3-player) GHZ game reduces the value of the game to zero polynomially quickly. That is, we show that the value of the n-fold GHZ game is at most n−Ω(1). This was first established by Holmgren and Raz [HR20]. We present a new proof of this theorem that we believe to be simpler and more direct. Unlike most previous works on parallel repetition, our proof makes no use of information theory, and relies on the use of Fourier analysis. The GHZ game [GHZ89] has played a foundational role in the understanding of quantum information theory, due in part to the fact that quantum strategies can win the GHZ game with probability 1. It is possible that improved parallel repetition bounds may find applications in this setting. Recently, Dinur, Harsha, Venkat, and Yuen [DHVY17] highlighted the GHZ game as a simple three-player game, which is in some sense maximally far from the class of multi-player games whose behavior under parallel repetition is well understood. Dinur et al. conjectured that parallel repetition decreases the value of the GHZ game exponentially quickly, and speculated that progress on proving this would shed light on parallel repetition for general multi-player (multi-prover) games. ∗Department of Computer Science, Princeton University. E-mail: ugirish@cs.princeton.edu. Research supported by the Simons Collaboration on Algorithms and Geometry, by a Simons Investigator Award and by the National Science Foundation grants No. CCF-1714779, CCF-2007462. †NTT Research. E-mail: justin.holmgren@ntt-research.com. ‡Department of Computer Science, Princeton University. E-mail: kmittal@cs.princeton.edu. Research supported by the Simons Collaboration on Algorithms and Geometry, by a Simons Investigator Award and by the National Science Foundation grants No. CCF-1714779, CCF-2007462. §Department of Computer Science, Princeton University. E-mail: ranr@cs.princeton.edu. Research supported by the Simons Collaboration on Algorithms and Geometry, by a Simons Investigator Award and by the National Science Foundation grants No. CCF-1714779, CCF-2007462. ¶Department of Computer Science, Princeton University. E-mail: weizhan@cs.princeton.edu. Research supported by the Simons Collaboration on Algorithms and Geometry, by a Simons Investigator Award and by the National Science Foundation grants No. CCF-1714779, CCF-2007462.

[1]  Guy Kindler,et al.  Spherical Cubes and Rounding in High Dimensions , 2008, 2008 49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[2]  Thomas Holenstein,et al.  Parallel repetition: simplifications and the no-signaling case , 2007, STOC '07.

[3]  Peter Høyer,et al.  Consequences and limits of nonlocal strategies , 2004, Proceedings. 19th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Complexity, 2004..

[4]  N. Alon,et al.  ECONOMICAL TORIC SPINES VIA CHEEGER'S INEQUALITY , 2008, 0809.3169.

[5]  Ran Raz,et al.  Block Rigidity: Strong Multiplayer Parallel Repetition implies Super-Linear Lower Bounds for Turing Machines , 2020, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[6]  Ran Raz,et al.  Direct product results and the GCD problem, in old and new communication models , 1997, STOC '97.

[7]  Irit Dinur,et al.  Multiplayer parallel repetition for expander games , 2016, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[8]  Uriel Feige,et al.  Error Reduction by Parallel Repetition—A Negative Result , 1996, Proceedings of Computational Complexity (Formerly Structure in Complexity Theory).

[9]  R. Raz Parallel Repetition of Two Prover Games , 2010 .

[10]  Uriel Feige On the success probability of the two provers in one-round proof systems , 1991, [1991] Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Structure in Complexity Theory Conference.

[11]  Oleg Verbitsky,et al.  Towards the parallel repetition conjecture , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE 9th Annual Conference on Structure in Complexity Theory.

[12]  Xi Chen,et al.  How to compress interactive communication , 2010, STOC '10.

[13]  David Steurer,et al.  Analytical approach to parallel repetition , 2013, STOC.

[14]  Ran Raz,et al.  A Counterexample to Strong Parallel Repetition , 2008, 2008 49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[15]  L. Fortnow,et al.  On the power of multi-power interactive protocols , 1988, [1988] Proceedings. Structure in Complexity Theory Third Annual Conference.

[16]  Ryan O'Donnell,et al.  Understanding Parallel Repetition Requires Understanding Foams , 2007, Twenty-Second Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC'07).

[17]  Mark Braverman,et al.  Small Value Parallel Repetition for General Games , 2014, STOC.

[18]  Mihir Bellare,et al.  Free Bits, PCPs, and Nonapproximability-Towards Tight Results , 1998, SIAM J. Comput..

[19]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Going Beyond Bell’s Theorem , 2007, 0712.0921.

[20]  Johan Håstad,et al.  Some optimal inapproximability results , 2001, JACM.

[21]  Justin Holmgren,et al.  The parallel repetition of non-signaling games: counterexamples and dichotomy , 2019, STOC.

[22]  Ran Raz,et al.  A Parallel Repetition Theorem for the GHZ Game , 2020, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[23]  Ran Raz,et al.  A parallel repetition theorem , 1995, STOC '95.

[24]  Avi Wigderson,et al.  Multi-prover interactive proofs: how to remove intractability assumptions , 2019, STOC '88.

[25]  L. Fortnow Complexity-Theoretic Aspects of Interactive Proof Systems , 1989 .