Monte Carlo evaluation of glandular dose in cone-beam X-ray computed tomography dedicated to the breast: Homogeneous and heterogeneous breast models.

PURPOSE In cone-beam computed tomography dedicated to the breast (BCT), the mean glandular dose (MGD) is the dose metric of reference, evaluated from the measured air kerma by means of normalized glandular dose coefficients (DgNCT). This work aimed at computing, for a simple breast model, a set of DgNCT values for monoenergetic and polyenergetic X-ray beams, and at validating the results vs. those for patient specific digital phantoms from BCT scans. METHODS We developed a Monte Carlo code for calculation of monoenergetic DgNCT coefficients (energy range 4.25-82.25 keV). The pendant breast was modelled as a cylinder of a homogeneous mixture of adipose and glandular tissue with glandular fractions by mass of 0.1%, 14.3%, 25%, 50% or 100%, enveloped by a 1.45 mm-thick skin layer. The breast diameter ranged between 8 cm and 18 cm. Then, polyenergetic DgNCT coefficients were analytically derived for 49-kVp W-anode spectra (half value layer 1.25-1.50 mm Al), as in a commercial BCT scanner. We compared the homogeneous models to 20 digital phantoms produced from classified 3D breast images. RESULTS Polyenergetic DgNCT resulted 13% lower than most recent published data. The comparison vs. patient specific breast phantoms showed that the homogeneous cylindrical model leads to a DgNCT percentage difference between -15% and +27%, with an average overestimation of 8%. CONCLUSIONS A dataset of monoenergetic and polyenergetic DgNCT coefficients for BCT was provided. Patient specific breast models showed a different volume distribution of glandular dose and determined a DgNCT 8% lower, on average, than homogeneous breast model.

[1]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. , 2008, Radiology.

[2]  J. S. Laughlin,et al.  Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. , 1979, Radiology.

[3]  I. Sechopoulos A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part II. Image reconstruction, processing and analysis, and advanced applications. , 2013, Medical physics.

[4]  Liem T. Bui-Mansfield Breast Imaging, 3rd ed. , 2008 .

[5]  G Tromba,et al.  Glandular dose in breast computed tomography with synchrotron radiation , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  R Longo,et al.  Imaging performance of phase-contrast breast computed tomography with synchrotron radiation and a CdTe photon-counting detector. , 2016, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[7]  Luigi Rigon,et al.  Synchrotron based planar imaging and digital tomosynthesis of breast and biopsy phantoms using a CMOS active pixel sensor. , 2015, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[8]  R. Hendrick,et al.  Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies. , 2010, Radiology.

[9]  Christian Steiding,et al.  Technical feasibility proof for high-resolution low-dose photon-counting CT of the breast , 2017, European Radiology.

[10]  V Fanti,et al.  Towards breast tomography with synchrotron radiation at Elettra: first images , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Uwe Fischer,et al.  The role of cone-beam breast-CT for breast cancer detection relative to breast density , 2017, European Radiology.

[12]  J. Boone,et al.  The effect of skin thickness determined using breast CT on mammographic dosimetry. , 2008, Medical physics.

[13]  Ioannis Sechopoulos,et al.  Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype. , 2010, Medical physics.

[14]  N Matela,et al.  Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study. , 2014, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[15]  Kenneth C. Young,et al.  A Monte Carlo model for mean glandular dose evaluation in spot compression mammography , 2017, Medical physics.

[16]  F Longo,et al.  GEANT4 for breast dosimetry: parameters optimization study , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Giovanni Mettivier,et al.  Dose Volume Distribution in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Phantom Study , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[18]  Andrew M. Hernandez,et al.  Breast dose in mammography is about 30% lower when realistic heterogeneous glandular distributions are considered. , 2015, Medical physics.

[19]  I. Sechopoulos A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part I. The image acquisition process. , 2013, Medical physics.

[20]  Stephen J Glick,et al.  Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for flat-panel CT breast imaging , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Giovanni Mettivier,et al.  Monte Carlo Evaluation of Normalized Glandular Dose Coefficients in Mammography , 2016, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[22]  I. Sechopoulos,et al.  Cupping artifact correction and automated classification for high-resolution dedicated breast CT images. , 2012, Medical physics.

[23]  Giovanni Mettivier,et al.  Dedicated breast computed tomography: Basic aspects. , 2015, Medical physics.

[24]  S Di Maria,et al.  Cancer risk estimation in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis using GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulations and voxel phantoms. , 2016, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[25]  Giovanni Mettivier,et al.  Imaging study of a phase-sensitive breast-CT system in continuous acquisition mode , 2017 .

[26]  I. Sechopoulos,et al.  A REVIEW OF DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS , 2014 .

[27]  Srinivasan Vedantham,et al.  Technical note: Skin thickness measurements using high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam dedicated breast CT. , 2013, Medical physics.

[28]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation. , 2001, Radiology.

[29]  Stamatia Destounis,et al.  An Overview of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis , 2015 .

[30]  K Bliznakova,et al.  Evaluation of the BreastSimulator software platform for breast tomography. , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  A. Sarno,et al.  A Monte Carlo study of monoenergetic and polyenergetic normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients in mammography , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  D. Kopans,et al.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art. , 2015, Radiology.

[33]  K Bliznakova,et al.  Homogeneous vs. patient specific breast models for Monte Carlo evaluation of mean glandular dose in mammography. , 2018, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[34]  Biao Chen,et al.  Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study. , 2002, Medical physics.

[35]  Andrew M Hernandez,et al.  Tungsten anode spectral model using interpolating cubic splines: unfiltered x-ray spectra from 20 kV to 640 kV. , 2014, Medical physics.

[36]  J. Boone,et al.  Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment. , 1999, Radiology.

[37]  Andrew M. Hernandez,et al.  Average glandular dose coefficients for pendant‐geometry breast CT using realistic breast phantoms , 2017, Medical physics.

[38]  Srinivasan Vedantham,et al.  Personalized estimates of radiation dose from dedicated breast CT in a diagnostic population and comparison with diagnostic mammography , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[39]  A. Rodríguez-Ruiz,et al.  Evaluation of the technical performance of three different commercial digital breast tomosynthesis systems in the clinical environment. , 2016, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[40]  A. Sarno,et al.  Air kerma calculation in Monte Carlo simulations for deriving normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography. , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[41]  Tianpeng Wang,et al.  Radiation doses in cone-beam breast computed tomography: a Monte Carlo simulation study. , 2011, Medical physics.

[42]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Monte Carlo reference data sets for imaging research: Executive summary of the report of AAPM Research Committee Task Group 195. , 2015, Medical physics.

[43]  Giovanni Mettivier,et al.  Investigation of the dose distribution for a cone beam CT system dedicated to breast imaging. , 2013, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[44]  J. Sempau,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of electron beams from an accelerator head using PENELOPE , 2001, Physics in Medicine and Biology.

[45]  D. Dance,et al.  Dosimetry in x-ray-based breast imaging. , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[46]  D Origgi,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: Dose and image quality assessment. , 2017, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[47]  T R Nelson,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography. , 2004, Medical physics.

[48]  W. Kalender,et al.  Comparative investigation of the detective quantum efficiency of direct and indirect conversion detector technologies in dedicated breast CT. , 2015, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[49]  Srinivasan Vedantham,et al.  Newer Technologies in Breast Cancer Imaging: Dedicated Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography. , 2018, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[50]  R. Bellazzini,et al.  A framework for iterative reconstruction in phase-contrast computed tomography dedicated to the breast , 2017, 2016 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Medical Imaging Conference and Room-Temperature Semiconductor Detector Workshop (NSS/MIC/RTSD).

[51]  Ruola Ning,et al.  Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[52]  I. Sechopoulos,et al.  Characterization of the homogeneous tissue mixture approximation in breast imaging dosimetry. , 2012, Medical physics.