Effects of post-cue interval on intentional forgetting.

This study examined the effect of post-cue interval on directed forgetting and suppression. Experiments 1 and 2 used the item method of directed forgetting. The interval between the cue to remember/forget (R/F) and the presence of the next item was manipulated. As the post-cue interval increased, the rates of hits and 'remember' responses on the recognition test also increased not only for R items but also for F items, suggesting that participants did not stop processing F items after the F cue. Experiment 3 manipulated both the number of response/suppression attempts and the duration of response/suppression for each word pair during the response/suppression phase. The results showed that increasing the number of suppression attempts led to worse recall in the subsequent memory test. However, increasing the duration of suppression reduced the suppression effect. These results provide insights into a key factor for successful intentional forgetting and suppression.

[1]  Hollyn M. Johnson,et al.  Processes of successful intentional forgetting. , 1994 .

[2]  Colin M. Macleod.  Directed forgetting affects both direct and indirect tests of memory. , 1989 .

[3]  Michael C. Anderson,et al.  Remembering can cause forgetting: retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  R. Block.  Effects of instructions to forget in short-term memory. , 1971 .

[5]  L. Light.  Memory and aging: four hypotheses in search of data. , 1991, Annual review of psychology.

[6]  Henry Reed,et al.  Effects of the instructional sets to remember and to forget on short-term retention: Studies of rehearsal control and retrieval inhibition (repression) , 1969 .

[7]  Jan Noyes,et al.  The disruption and dissolution of directed forgetting : Inhibitory control of memory , 2000 .

[8]  Michael C. Anderson,et al.  Suppressing unwanted memories by executive control , 2001, Nature.

[9]  Gary J. Gargano,et al.  Directed forgetting in implicit and explicit memory tests: A comparison of methods. , 1993 .

[10]  D. Wegner.  Ironic processes of mental control. , 1994, Psychological review.

[11]  W. Donaldson,et al.  The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[12]  R. E. Geiselman,et al.  Repetition effects in directed forgetting: evidence for retrieval inhibition , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Katherine Kipp,et al.  The Development of Efficient Inhibition: Evidence from Directed-Forgetting Tasks. , 1998 .

[14]  G. Radvansky,et al.  Studies of directed forgetting in older adults. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  J. D. McGaugh.  Memory--a century of consolidation. , 2000, Science.

[16]  R. G. Crowder,et al.  Instructed forgetting: Rehearsal control or retrieval inhibition (repression)? , 1972 .

[17]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Recall and recognition as a function of primary rehearsal. , 1973 .

[18]  Gina Calcaterra,et al.  Intentional forgetting benefits from thought substitution , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  W. K. Timmins.  Varying processing time in directed forgetting , 1974 .

[20]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  Long-term recognition and recall following directed forgetting. , 1975, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory.

[21]  C. Douglas Wetzel,et al.  Cue delay and the role of rehearsal in directed forgetting. , 1977 .

[22]  D. Wegner.  When the Antidote is the Poison: Ironic Mental Control Processes , 1997 .

[23]  Colin M. Macleod.  The item and list methods of directed forgetting: Test differences and the role of demand characteristics , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.