Educational Production

The literature on class size yields a number of findings. First, class size effects are difficult to find except when using data where class size variations are truly exogenous. Second, Catholic schools have large classes and better performance. Third, to the extent that class size matters, it is more important for disadvantaged children. Special education classes are smaller than advanced placement classes. Fourth, when many children have joined a class recently, the joiners and their classmates do worse. The theory presented below reconciles all of these facts by recognizing that classroom teaching is a public good where congestion effects are potentially important. Because the optimal class size is larger for behaved-students, the observed relation of educational output to class size is small or even positive. However, increasing class size to ranges away from equilibrium levels will adversely affect educational output. The theory argues for a particular non-linear relation of educational output to class size and is consistent with observed variations in class size by grade level, student and teacher characteristics. Class sizes are more significant in small classes than large ones. There is a special function that maps the substitution of discipline for class size, which may explain why Catholic schools, with large classes, out-perform public schools. The same technology also implies that class size effects are larger for problem children than for well-behaved children. Private schools, which charge a positive price and compete with free public schools, attract better students. This selection may help explain why Catholic schools out-perform public schools even though expulsion rates are lower in Catholic schools than in public ones. Teachers may prefer smaller class size than students or parents either because wages do not reflect working conditions fully or because teachers as a group can raise the demand for their services by lowering class size. The theory provides a measurable and operational way to define school quality that can be tested empirically. Finally, because public schools that operate in a centralized environment do not capture the returns to their successes, public school incentives differ from those of private schools.

[1]  M. Kremer,et al.  The O-Ring Theory of Economic Development , 1993 .

[2]  澤田 米男,et al.  Culture and language , 1988 .

[3]  Laura M. Argys,et al.  Tracking in the United States: Descriptive statistics from NELS , 1996 .

[4]  J. Heckman Doing It Right: Job Training and Education. , 1999 .

[5]  Thomas J. Nechyba,et al.  Mobility, Targeting, and Private-School Vouchers , 2000 .

[6]  Boyan Jovanovic,et al.  Labor Mobility and Wages , 1979 .

[7]  C. Hoxby What Do America's 'Traditional' Forms of School Choice Teach Us About School Choice Reforms? , 1998 .

[8]  S. Rosen Some Economics of Teaching , 1987, Journal of Labor Economics.

[9]  R. A. Kessel,et al.  Competition, Monopoly, and the Pursuit of Pecuniary Gain , 1962 .

[10]  Derek A. Neal The Effects of Catholic Secondary Schooling on Educational Achievement , 1997, Journal of Labor Economics.

[11]  C. Hoxby The Effects of Class Size and Composition on Student Achievement: New Evidence from Natural Population Variation , 1998 .

[12]  S. Rosen,et al.  The New Economics of Teachers and Education , 1994, Journal of Labor Economics.

[13]  Lawrence J. White,et al.  The Analytics of the Pricing of Higher Education and Other Services in Which the Customers Are Inputs , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[14]  Elizabeth M. Caucutt Peer group effects in applied general equilibrium , 2001 .

[15]  W. Sander Catholic High Schools and Rural Academic Achievement , 1997 .

[16]  S. Hoffman A Treatise on the Family , 2000 .

[17]  S. Rosen,et al.  Discrimination in the market for public school teachers , 1975 .

[18]  W. Evans,et al.  Finishing High School and Starting College: Do Catholic Schools Make a Difference? , 1995 .

[19]  Caroline M. Hoxby,et al.  How Teachers' Unions Affect Education Production , 1996 .

[20]  G. Burtless,et al.  Does money matter? : the effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success , 1997 .

[21]  Richard Rogerson,et al.  Public Education and Income Distribution: A Dynamic Quantitative Evaluation of Education-Finance Reform , 1998 .

[22]  Kelly Bedard,et al.  School Size and the Distribution of Test Scores , 1999 .

[23]  Peer group effects and educational production functions , 1978 .

[24]  M. Urquiola Demand Matters: School District Concentration, Composition, and Educational Expenditure , 2000 .

[25]  D. Epple,et al.  American Economic Association Competition between Private and Public Schools , Vouchers , and Peer-Group Effects , 2007 .

[26]  David Card,et al.  Does School Quality Matter? Returns to Education and the Characteristics of Public Schools in the United States , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[27]  E. Hanushek,et al.  Conclusions and Controversies About the Effectiveness of School Resources , 1998 .

[28]  C. Olson,et al.  High School Inputs and Labor Market Outcomes for Male Workers in Their Mid-Thirties: New Data and New Estimates from Wisconsin. , 2000 .