DIFFERENTIAL COSTS OF A SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTER: AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF THE HANDICAP PRINCIPLE

The evolution of reliable signaling can be explained by the handicap principle, which assumes that (1) the cost of a signal guarantees its reliability, and (2) cheating is prevented because the cost of a unit of display is greater for low‐quality than for high‐quality individuals. A test of these two assumptions was performed using manipulations of the length of the outermost tail feathers of male barn swallows Hirundo rustica, a trait currently subject to a directional female mate preference. We found that survival decreased with tail elongation and increased with tail shortening of males, supporting the assumption that the secondary sexual character is costly. Naturally long‐tailed males were better able to survive with an elongated tail, whereas naturally short‐tailed males improved their survival following tail shortening. This observation supports the second assumption of a differential cost of a signal. One mechanism imposing differential costs on sexually signaling barn swallows is foraging. Males with elongated tails captured smaller, less profitable Diptera, whereas males with shortened tails captured large, profitable prey items. The conditions for reliable sexual signaling by the tail ornament of male barn swallows are thus fulfilled.

[1]  A Grafen,et al.  Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  A. Karter,et al.  Parasites, Bright Males, and the Immunocompetence Handicap , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[3]  A. Møller,et al.  Female choice selects for male sexual tail ornaments in the monogamous swallow , 1988, Nature.

[4]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .

[5]  R. Lande Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  A. Zahavi Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  R. Dawkins,et al.  Animal signals: information or manipulation? , 1978 .

[8]  A. Møller,et al.  Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments , 1992, Nature.

[9]  M. Andersson EVOLUTION OF CONDITION‐DEPENDENT SEX ORNAMENTS AND MATING PREFERENCES: SEXUAL SELECTION BASED ON VIABILITY DIFFERENCES , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  C. Magnhagen Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  Steven D. Gaines,et al.  Analysis of Biological Data When there are Ordered Expectations , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[12]  A. Turner,et al.  Central place foraging by swallows (Hirundinidae): The question of load size , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  A. Turner Optimal foraging by the swallow (Hirundo rustica, L): Prey size selection , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  J. Heywood SEXUAL SELECTION BY THE HANDICAP MECHANISM , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  C. Grossman Interactions between the gonadal steroids and the immune system. , 1985, Science.

[16]  A. Møller,et al.  Viability costs of male tail ornaments in a swallow , 1989, Nature.

[17]  G. Klump,et al.  Use of non-arbitrary acoustic criteria in mate choice by female gray tree frogs , 1987, Nature.

[18]  Anders Pape Møller,et al.  Male tail length and female mate choice in the monogamous swallow Hirundo rustica , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  The aerodynamic and mechanical effects of elongated tails in the scarlet-tufted malachite sunbird: measuring the cost of a handicap , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  J. Bradbury,et al.  The energetic cost of display in male sage grouse , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  Andrew Pomiankowski,et al.  The evolution of female mating preferences for male genetic quality , 1988 .

[22]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES II. THE “HANDICAP” PRINCIPLE , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES I. FISHER AND BIASED MUTATION , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  A. Møller SEXUAL SELECTION IN THE MONOGAMOUS BARN SWALLOW (HIRUNDO RUSTICA). I. DETERMINANTS OF TAIL ORNAMENT SIZE , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  A. Grafen Biological signals as handicaps. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  L. Sevensson Identification Guide to European Passerines , 1975 .

[27]  H. Southern,et al.  Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa; the Birds of the Western Palearctic , 1978 .

[28]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.

[29]  F. Lope,et al.  FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE EFFORT DEPENDS ON THE DEGREE OF ORNAMENTATION OF THEIR MATES , 1993 .