DIFFERENTIAL COSTS OF A SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTER: AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF THE HANDICAP PRINCIPLE
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A Grafen,et al. Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.
[2] A. Karter,et al. Parasites, Bright Males, and the Immunocompetence Handicap , 1992, The American Naturalist.
[3] A. Møller,et al. Female choice selects for male sexual tail ornaments in the monogamous swallow , 1988, Nature.
[4] Hilla Peretz,et al. Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .
[5] R. Lande. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[6] A. Zahavi. Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.
[7] R. Dawkins,et al. Animal signals: information or manipulation? , 1978 .
[8] A. Møller,et al. Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments , 1992, Nature.
[9] M. Andersson. EVOLUTION OF CONDITION‐DEPENDENT SEX ORNAMENTS AND MATING PREFERENCES: SEXUAL SELECTION BASED ON VIABILITY DIFFERENCES , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[10] C. Magnhagen. Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[11] Steven D. Gaines,et al. Analysis of Biological Data When there are Ordered Expectations , 1990, The American Naturalist.
[12] A. Turner,et al. Central place foraging by swallows (Hirundinidae): The question of load size , 1982, Animal Behaviour.
[13] A. Turner. Optimal foraging by the swallow (Hirundo rustica, L): Prey size selection , 1982, Animal Behaviour.
[14] J. Heywood. SEXUAL SELECTION BY THE HANDICAP MECHANISM , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[15] C. Grossman. Interactions between the gonadal steroids and the immune system. , 1985, Science.
[16] A. Møller,et al. Viability costs of male tail ornaments in a swallow , 1989, Nature.
[17] G. Klump,et al. Use of non-arbitrary acoustic criteria in mate choice by female gray tree frogs , 1987, Nature.
[18] Anders Pape Møller,et al. Male tail length and female mate choice in the monogamous swallow Hirundo rustica , 1990, Animal Behaviour.
[19] Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al. The aerodynamic and mechanical effects of elongated tails in the scarlet-tufted malachite sunbird: measuring the cost of a handicap , 1992, Animal Behaviour.
[20] J. Bradbury,et al. The energetic cost of display in male sage grouse , 1989, Animal Behaviour.
[21] Andrew Pomiankowski,et al. The evolution of female mating preferences for male genetic quality , 1988 .
[22] Y. Iwasa,et al. THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES II. THE “HANDICAP” PRINCIPLE , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[23] Yoh Iwasa,et al. THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES I. FISHER AND BIASED MUTATION , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[24] A. Møller. SEXUAL SELECTION IN THE MONOGAMOUS BARN SWALLOW (HIRUNDO RUSTICA). I. DETERMINANTS OF TAIL ORNAMENT SIZE , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[25] A. Grafen. Biological signals as handicaps. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.
[26] L. Sevensson. Identification Guide to European Passerines , 1975 .
[27] H. Southern,et al. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa; the Birds of the Western Palearctic , 1978 .
[28] R. Punnett,et al. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.
[29] F. Lope,et al. FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE EFFORT DEPENDS ON THE DEGREE OF ORNAMENTATION OF THEIR MATES , 1993 .