Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension.

In two experiments, we explored the use of event-related brain potentials to selectively track the processes that establish reference during spoken language comprehension. Subjects listened to stories in which a particular noun phrase like "the girl" either uniquely referred to a single referent mentioned in the earlier discourse, or ambiguously referred to two equally suitable referents. Referentially ambiguous nouns ("the girl" with two girls introduced in the discourse context) elicited a frontally dominant and sustained negative shift in brain potentials, emerging within 300-400 ms after acoustic noun onset. The early onset of this effect reveals that reference to a discourse entity can be established very rapidly. Its morphology and distribution suggest that at least some of the processing consequences of referential ambiguity may involve an increased demand on memory resources. Furthermore, because this referentially induced ERP effect is very different from that of well-known ERP effects associated with the semantic (N400) and syntactic (e.g., P600/SPS) aspects of language comprehension, it suggests that ERPs can be used to selectively keep track of three major processes involved in the comprehension of an unfolding piece of discourse.

[1]  C. Habel,et al.  Language , 1931, NeuroImage.

[2]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[3]  Mark Steedman,et al.  The use of context by the psychological parser , 1981 .

[4]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The neurocognition of syntactic processing , 1999 .

[5]  Mark Steedman,et al.  On not being led up the garden path : The use of context by the psychological syntax processor , 1985 .

[6]  Anne Pier Salverda,et al.  The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension , 2003, Cognition.

[7]  M. Kutas,et al.  Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  The Neurobiology of Language Comprehension , 1998 .

[9]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation , 1999, Cognition.

[10]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[11]  A. Jongman Effects of vowel length and syllable structure on segment duration in Dutch , 1998 .

[12]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  61 Postlexical Integration Processes in Language Comprehension : Evidence from Brain-Imaging Research , 2002 .

[13]  Jerome L. Myers,et al.  Accessing the discourse representation during reading , 1998 .

[14]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[15]  Simon Garrod,et al.  The Contribution of Lexical and Situational Knowledge to Resolving Discourse Roles: Bonding and Resolution , 2000 .

[16]  H. M. Müller,et al.  Event-related potentials elicited by spoken relative clauses. , 1997, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  T C Gunter,et al.  Working memory constraints on syntactic processing: an electrophysiological investigation. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[18]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials Elicited by Failure to Agree , 1995 .

[19]  Frank Rösler,et al.  Event-Related Responses to Pronoun and Proper Name Anaphors in Parallel and Nonparallel Discourse Structures , 1999, Brain and Language.

[20]  E. Gibson Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[21]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  Slow negative brain potentials as reflections of specific modular resources of cognition , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[22]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Accent and reference resolution in spoken-language comprehension , 2002 .

[23]  Thomas F Münte,et al.  Electrophysiological estimates of biological and syntactic gender violation during pronoun processing. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[24]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  On the electrophysiology of language comprehension: Implications for the human language system , 2000 .

[25]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[26]  M. Kutas,et al.  Bridging the Gap: Evidence from ERPs on the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  A. Friederici,et al.  Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  P. Hagoort,et al.  A superficial resemblance does not necessarily mean you are part of the family : Counterarguments to Coulson, King and Kutas (1998) in the P600/SPS-P300 debate , 1999 .

[29]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  The representational structures of the language faculty and their interactions , 2000 .

[30]  C. Clifton,et al.  The independence of syntactic processing , 1986 .

[31]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potential studies of associative recognition and recall: electrophysiological evidence for context dependent retrieval processes. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[33]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech , 1993 .

[34]  M. Kutas,et al.  Views on how the electrical activity that the brain generates reflects the functions of different language structures. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[35]  M. Garrett,et al.  Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al.  The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking , 2000, Cognition.

[37]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .

[38]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[39]  Martha E. Pollack,et al.  Incremental Interpretation , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[40]  F. Rösler,et al.  Monitoring retrieval from long-term memory by slow event-related brain potentials. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[41]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Early Contextual Influences during Spoken-Word Recognition: N200 Versus N400 Effects , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  M. Kutas In the company of other words: Electrophysiological evidence for single-word and sentence context effects , 1993 .

[43]  Marta Kutas,et al.  The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: an ERP study. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[44]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials , 1999 .

[45]  Rugg,et al.  Memory retrieval: an electrophysiological perspective , 1999 .

[46]  A. Sanford Aspects of Pronoun Interpretation: Evaluation of Search Formulations of Inference , 1985 .

[47]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[48]  G. Altmann,et al.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.

[49]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  ERP effects of listening to speech: semantic ERP effects , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  Gerry T. M. Altmann,et al.  Ambiguity, parsing strategies, and computational models , 1988 .

[51]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  When Does Gender Constrain Parsing? Evidence from ERPs , 1999 .

[52]  John C. Trueswell,et al.  Chapter 7 – Sentence Comprehension , 1995 .

[53]  S. Pinker The Language Instinct , 1994 .

[54]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Brain responses to lexical ambiguity resolution and parsing. , 1994 .

[55]  Albert T. Corbett Prenominal adjectives and the disambiguation of anaphoric nouns , 1984 .

[56]  P Hagoort,et al.  Discourse Before Gender: An Event-Related Brain Potential Study on the Interplay of Semantic and Syntactic Information During Spoken Language Understanding , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[57]  S. Garrod,et al.  Resolving sentences in a discourse context: How discourse representation affects language understanding. , 1994 .

[58]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  Parsing of Sentences in a Language with Varying Word Order: Word-by-Word Variations of Processing Demands Are Revealed by Event-Related Brain Potentials ☆ ☆☆ ★ , 1998 .

[59]  E. Plante,et al.  Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[60]  Alan Garnham,et al.  Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora , 2001 .

[61]  Marta Kutas,et al.  When temporal terms belie conceptual order , 1998, Nature.

[62]  Celia M. Klin,et al.  When Anaphor Resolution Fails , 2000 .

[63]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Exposure-based models of human parsing: Evidence for the use of coarse-grained (nonlexical) statistical records , 1995 .

[64]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Semantic Integration in Sentences and Discourse: Evidence from the N400 , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[65]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[66]  A D Friederici,et al.  Syntactic Working Memory and the Establishment of Filler-Gap Dependencies: Insights from ERPs and fMRI , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.