Credibility Assessments of Online Health Information: The Effects of Source Expertise and Knowledge of Content

Millions of Americans use the Internet as a resource for information, with a large proportion seeking health information. Research indicates that medical professionals do not author an extensive amount of health information available on the Internet. This creates a possibility for false information, thereby potentially leading ill people away from proper care. One way to begin addressing this problem is to assess perceptions of credibility about information found online. A between-groups, 2 (message type) × 3 (source type) factorial design was tested by manipulating source expertise (high, medium, low) and content knowledge (known and unknown). While findings did not indicate a significant interaction between source and content type, they did indicate an overall tendency to rate all information as relatively credible. In addition, results indicate that both knowledge of content and source expertise affect perceptions of online health information.

[1]  B L Humphreys,et al.  Medicine and health on the Internet: the good, the bad, and the ugly. , 1998, JAMA.

[2]  M. Hamilton Message Variables That Mediate and Moderate the Effect of Equivocal Language on Source Credibility , 1998 .

[3]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. , 1979 .

[4]  Noshir Contractor,et al.  The Effect of Conflicting Information on Media Skepticism , 1987 .

[5]  Philip Meyer,et al.  Defining and Measuring Credibility of Newspapers: Developing an Index , 1988 .

[6]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Understanding Judgment of Information Quality and Cognitive Authority in the WWW , 1998 .

[7]  M. Slater,et al.  How Message Evaluation and Source Attributes May Influence Credibility Assessment and Belief Change , 1996 .

[8]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Perceptions of Internet Information Credibility , 2000 .

[9]  Duangkamol Chartprasert,et al.  How Bureaucratic Writing Style Affects Source Credibility , 1993 .

[10]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[11]  Akiba A. Cohen,et al.  Social Reality and Television News: Perceptual Dimensions of Social Conflicts in Selected Life Areas. , 1984 .

[12]  C. Nass,et al.  Differential Criteria for Evaluating Credibility of Newspapers and TV News , 1989 .

[13]  J. Eisenberg,et al.  Views from funding agencies. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. , 1998, Medical care.

[14]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness , 1951 .

[15]  W. Wanta,et al.  The Effects of Credibility, Reliance, and Exposure on Media Agenda-Setting: A Path Analysis Model , 1994 .

[16]  M. Feldman,et al.  'Virtual' factitious disorders and Munchausen by proxy. , 1998, The Western journal of medicine.

[17]  Mark D. West,et al.  Validating a Scale for the Measurement of Credibility: A Covariance Structure Modeling Approach , 1994 .

[18]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[19]  C. Gaziano,et al.  Measuring the Concept of Credibility , 1986 .

[20]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  Cruising is Believing?: Comparing Internet and Traditional Sources on Media Credibility Measures , 1998 .

[21]  Wright Jb Quality connections on the Internet. , 1998 .

[22]  E. Austin,et al.  Source v. Content Effects on Judgments of News Believability , 1994 .

[23]  B. Greenberg,et al.  Media Use and Believability: Some Multiple Correlates , 1966 .