Connecting Networkwide Travel Time Reliability and the Network Fundamental Diagram of Traffic Flow

The existence of the network fundamental diagram (NFD) has been established at the urban network scale. It relates three traffic descriptors: speed, density, and flow. However, its deterministic nature does not convey the underlying variability within the network. In contrast, travel time reliability as a network performance descriptor is of growing concern to both the traveling public and traffic managers and policy makers. The objectives of this paper were to extend travel time reliability modeling from the link–path level to the network level and to connect overall network variability to NFD. Robust relationships between travel time variability and network density and flow rate were analytically derived, investigated, and validated with both simulated and real-world trajectory data. The distance-weighted standard deviation of travel time rate, as a measure of travel time variability, was found to increase monotonically with network density. A maximum network flow rate existed beyond which network travel time reliability deteriorated at a much faster pace. The results also suggest that these relationships are inherent network properties (signature) that are independent of demand level. The effects of en route information on the proposed relationships were also studied. The results showed that en route information reduced network travel time variability. The findings provide a strong connection between NFD and travel time variability, and this connection can be used further for modeling of network travel time reliability and assessment of measures intended to improve reliability of travel in a network.

[1]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF ROUTE AND DEPARTURE TIME CHOICE DYNAMICS OF URBAN COMMUTERS , 1988 .

[2]  N. Geroliminis,et al.  Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: Some experimental findings - eScholarship , 2007 .

[3]  B D Greenshields,et al.  A study of traffic capacity , 1935 .

[4]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Multimodal Transport in Nairobi, Kenya: Insights and Recommendations with a Macroscopic Evidence-Based Model , 2011 .

[5]  A J Richardson,et al.  TRAVEL TIME VARIABILITY ON COMMUTER JOURNEYS , 1978 .

[6]  M. Taylor.  Travel Time Variability—The Case of Two Public Modes , 1982 .

[7]  David M Levinson,et al.  The Value of Advanced Traveler Information Systems for Route Choice , 2003 .

[8]  Shirish S. Joshi,et al.  A Mean-Variance Model for Route Guidance in Advanced Traveler Information Systems , 2001, Transp. Sci..

[9]  David L Schrank,et al.  MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS FOR MAJOR INVESTMENT STUDIES , 1996 .

[10]  Joachim Wahle.  Advanced Traveller Information Systems , 2008 .

[11]  I. Prigogine,et al.  A Two-Fluid Approach to Town Traffic , 1979, Science.

[12]  H. Mahmassani,et al.  Exploring Properties of Networkwide Flow–Density Relations in a Freeway Network , 2012 .

[13]  Timothy J Lomax,et al.  SELECTING TRAVEL RELIABILITY MEASURES , 2003 .

[14]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  MACROPARTICLE TRAFFIC SIMULATION MODEL TO INVESTIGATE PEAK-PERIOD COMMUTER DECISION DYNAMICS. , 1985 .

[15]  Elizabeth G. Jones,et al.  TRAVEL TIME VARIABILITY IN A COMMUTING CORRIDOR: IMPLICATIONS FOR ELECTRONIC ROUTE GUIDANCE , 1989 .

[16]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Urban Gridlock: Macroscopic Modeling and Mitigation Approaches , 2007 .

[17]  Christine Buisson,et al.  Exploring the Impact of Homogeneity of Traffic Measurements on the Existence of Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams , 2009 .

[18]  C Terence,et al.  The Value of Time and Reliability: Measurement from a Value Pricing Experiment , 2003 .

[19]  N. Geroliminis,et al.  An analytical approximation for the macropscopic fundamental diagram of urban traffic , 2008 .

[20]  H. Greenberg.  An Analysis of Traffic Flow , 1959 .

[21]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  DYNAMICS OF COMMUTING DECISION BEHAVIOR UNDER ADVANCED TRAVELER INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 1999 .

[22]  Y. Yim,et al.  The Benefits of Advanced Traveler Information Systems , 1998 .

[23]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Sampling strategies for two-fluid model parameter estimation in urban networks , 1995 .

[24]  M. R. C. McDowell,et al.  Kinetic Theory of Vehicular Traffic , 1972 .

[25]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Network performance under system optimal and user equilibrium dynamic assignments: Implications for , 1993 .

[26]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  URBAN TRAFFIC NETWORK FLOW MODELS , 1987 .

[27]  Robert L. Bertini,et al.  Using Travel Time Reliability Measures to Improve Regional Transportation Planning and Operations , 2008 .

[28]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Characterizing Travel Time Variability in Vehicular Traffic Networks , 2012 .

[29]  Nikolaos Geroliminis,et al.  Properties of a well-defined Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram for urban traffic , 2011 .

[30]  Robert L. Bertini,et al.  Beyond Corridor Reliability Measures: Analysis of Freeway Travel Time Reliability at the Segment Level for Hot Spot Identification , 2010 .

[31]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Investigating the Shape of the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram Using Simulation Data , 2010 .

[32]  Hesham A. Rakha,et al.  Estimating Path Travel-Time Reliability , 2006, 2006 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference.

[33]  R Herman,et al.  TRIP TIME CHARACTERISTICS OF JOURNEYS TO AND FROM WORK , 1974 .

[34]  Adib Kanafani,et al.  Modeling the benefits of advanced traveler information systems in corridors with incidents , 1993 .

[35]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  INVESTIGATION OF NETWORK-LEVEL TRAFFIC FLOW RELATIONSHIPS: SOME SIMULATION RESULTS , 1984 .

[36]  Samiul Hasan,et al.  Modeling Travel Time Variability on Urban Links in London , 2009 .