The Value of “Liver Windows” Settings in the Detection of Small Renal Cell Carcinomas on Unenhanced Computed Tomography

Objective To assess if “liver window” settings improve the conspicuity of small renal cell carcinomas (RCC). Methods Patients were analysed from our institution's pathology-confirmed RCC database that included the following: (1) stage T1a RCCs, (2) an unenhanced computed tomography (CT) abdomen performed ≤ 6 months before histologic diagnosis, and (3) age ≥ 17 years. Patients with multiple tumours, prior nephrectomy, von Hippel-Lindau disease, and polycystic kidney disease were excluded. The unenhanced CT was analysed, and the tumour locations were confirmed by using corresponding contrast-enhanced CT or magnetic resonance imaging studies. Representative single-slice axial, coronal, and sagittal unenhanced CT images were acquired in “soft tissue windows” (width, 400 Hounsfield unit (HU); level, 40 HU) and liver windows (width, 150 HU; level, 88 HU). In addition, single-slice axial, coronal, and sagittal unenhanced CT images of nontumourous renal tissue (obtained from the same cases) were acquired in soft tissue windows and liver windows. These data sets were randomized, unpaired, and were presented independently to 3 blinded radiologists for analysis. The presence or absence of suspicious findings for tumour was scored on a 5-point confidence scale. Results Eighty-three of 415 patients met the study criteria. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis, t test analysis, and kappa analysis were used. ROC analysis showed statistically superior diagnostic performance for liver windows compared with soft tissue windows (area under the curve of 0.923 vs 0.879; P = .0002). Kappa statistics showed “good” vs “moderate” agreement between readers for liver windows compared with soft tissue windows. Conclusion Use of liver windows settings improves the detection of small RCCs on the unenhanced CT.

[1]  Chuan Zhou,et al.  Prevalence of incidental findings in trauma patients detected by computed tomography imaging. , 2009, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[2]  G. Preminger,et al.  Unenhanced helical computerized tomography for the evaluation of patients with acute flank pain. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[3]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[4]  N H Strickland.  Review article: some cost-benefit considerations for PACS: a radiological perspective. , 1996, The British journal of radiology.

[5]  F. Stacul,et al.  Present-day imaging of patients with renal colic , 2001, European Radiology.

[6]  W W Mayo-Smith,et al.  Detecting hepatic lesions: the added utility of CT liver window settings. , 1999, Radiology.

[7]  James A Brink,et al.  Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: white paper of the ACR incidental findings committee. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[8]  M. Kalra,et al.  Current status of low dose multi-detector CT in the urinary tract. , 2011, World journal of radiology.

[9]  C. White,et al.  Liver and bone window settings for soft-copy interpretation of chest and abdominal CT. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  J A Hanley,et al.  Sampling variability of nonparametric estimates of the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves: an update. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[11]  I. Francis.  Detection, staging and surveillance in renal cell carcinoma , 2006, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[12]  R. Smith,et al.  CT for the evaluation of flank pain. , 2001, Journal of endourology.

[13]  N. Turhan,et al.  Preoperative staging of renal cell carcinoma with multidetector CT. , 2009, Diagnostic and interventional radiology.

[14]  M. Federle.  Are liver windows necessary in body CT? , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  R C Smith,et al.  Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. , 1995, Radiology.

[16]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[17]  Jingbo Zhang,et al.  Imaging of kidney cancer. , 2007, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[18]  B. Leibovich,et al.  Contemporary imaging modalities for the surveillance of patients with renal cell carcinoma , 2007, Current urology reports.

[19]  Y. Hata,et al.  The incidence of simple renal cyst by computed tomography. , 1983, Clinical radiology.

[20]  R C Smith,et al.  The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[21]  CT detection of hepatic and splenic injuries: usefulness of liver window settings. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  P G Herman,et al.  Comparison of Fixed and Adjustable Window Width and Level Settings in the CT Evaluation of Diffuse Lung Disease , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[23]  R. Cestari,et al.  Incidental renal cell carcinoma-age and stage characterization and clinical implications: study of 1092 patients (1982-1997). , 2000, Urology.

[24]  N. Terada,et al.  The natural history of simple renal cysts. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[25]  Bone Metastases from Breast Cancer: Value of CT Bone Windows , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[26]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[27]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[28]  K M Harris,et al.  The effect on apparent size of simulated pulmonary nodules of using three standard CT window settings. , 1993, Clinical radiology.