Multistage Classification of Current Density Distribution Maps of Various Heart States Based on Correlation Analysis and k-NN Algorithm

Magnetocardiography is a modern method of registration of the magnetic component of electromagnetic field, generated by heart activity. Magnetocardiography results are a useful source for the diagnosis of various heart diseases and states, but their usage is still undervalued in the cardiology community. In this study, a two-stage classification by correlation analysis using a k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) algorithm is applied for the binary classification of myocardium current density distribution maps (CDDMs). Fourteen groups of CDDMs from patients with different heart states, healthy volunteers, sportsmen, patients with negative T-peak, patients with myocardial damage, male and female patients with microvascular disease, patients with ischemic heart disease, and patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, divided into five and three different groups depending on the degree of pathology, were compared. Selection of best metric, used in classifier and number of neighbors, was performed to define the classifier with best performance for each pair of heart states. Accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and precision values dependent on the number of neighbors are obtained for each class. The proposed method allows to obtain a value of average accuracy equal to 96%, 70% sensitivity, 98% specificity, and 70% precision.

[1]  I. Chaikovsky,et al.  Binary Classification of Heart Failures Using k-NN with Various Distance Metrics , 2015 .

[2]  I. Chaikovsky,et al.  k-NN binary classification of heart failures using myocardial current density distribution maps , 2015, 2015 Signal Processing Symposium (SPSympo).

[3]  I. Chaikovsky,et al.  Ischemic heart disease recognition by k-NN classification of current density distribution maps , 2015, 2015 IEEE 35th International Conference on Electronics and Nanotechnology (ELNANO).

[4]  I. Chaikovsky,et al.  Current density distribution maps threshold processing , 2014, IEEE International Conference on Electronics and Nanotechnology.

[5]  I Chaĭkovskiĭ,et al.  [Magnetocardiography in clinical practice: algorithms and technologies for data analysis]. , 2011, Likars'ka sprava.

[6]  Guy Lapalme,et al.  A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks , 2009, Inf. Process. Manag..

[7]  B. Hailer,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of magnetocardiography, using computerized classification of current density vectors maps, in ischemic patients with normal ECG and echocardiogram , 2007 .

[8]  K. Nakai,et al.  Visualization of the current-density distribution for MCG with WPW syndrome patients using independent component analysis , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[9]  N. Budnik,et al.  Detection of coronary artery disease in patients with normal or unspecifically changed ECG on the basis of magnetocardiography , 2001 .

[10]  S. Yamada,et al.  Magnetocardiographic mapping characteristic for diagnosis of ischemic heart disease , 2000, Computers in Cardiology 2000. Vol.27 (Cat. 00CH37163).

[11]  L. Trahms,et al.  Magnetocardiography and 32‐Lead Potential Mapping , 1997, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[12]  M. Burghoff,et al.  Magnetocardiographic localization of accessory conduction pathway in patients suffering from WPW syndrome , 1995, Computers in Cardiology 1995.