When Customers Think Differently: A Customer-side Categorization Approach to Strategic Groups

This paper draws upon categorization theory and applies it to segmentation and strategic group research. In contrast to existing approaches that have investigated the categorizations of managers and industry experts, we investigate customers' patterns of brand categorization. Customer groups defined by their pattern of brand categorization can be conceptualized as the demand-side counterpart of strategic groups. Characterising customer segments or strategic groups by their respective probabilities of brand categorization (brand consideration, brand neutrality, brand rejection) helps to understand the competitive structure of a market and preference barriers that exist for brands (i.e. it is very difficult for a firm to enter a segment/strategic group where its brand is rejected). These preference barriers in effect represent mobility barriers for firms and are crucial for understanding the dynamics of competition in a given market. Conceiving brand categorization as a goal-derived categorization process, we propose and show that product category goals and category-specific benefits differ across brand categorization segments. Applying our approach in the automotive industry helps to explain market phenomena that are difficult to account for with solely a traditional resource based perspective on strategic groups.

[1]  J. Swait,et al.  Brand Credibility, Brand Consideration, and Choice , 2004 .

[2]  Amitav Chakravarti,et al.  The Influence of Macro-Level Motives on Consideration Set Composition in Novel Purchase Situations , 2003 .

[3]  David L. Deephouse,et al.  Competitive Positioning Withing and Across a Strategic Group Structure: The Performance of Core, Secondary, and Solitary Firms , 2002 .

[4]  Girish Punj,et al.  Decision constraints and consideration‐set formation in consumer durables , 2001 .

[5]  J. D. Osborne,et al.  Strategic groups and competitive enactment: a study of dynamic relationships between mental models and performance , 2001 .

[6]  Kalpesh Kaushik Desai,et al.  Descriptive Characteristics of Memory-Based Consideration Sets: Influence of Usage Occasion Frequency and Usage Location Familiarity , 2000 .

[7]  M. Laroche,et al.  Strategic Brand Evaluations Among Fast-Food Franchises: A Test of Two Frameworks , 1999 .

[8]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Product, person, and purpose: putting the consumer back into theories of dynamic market behaviour , 1999 .

[9]  Margaret A. Peteraf,et al.  GETTING TO KNOW YOU: A THEORY OF STRATEGIC GROUP IDENTITY , 1997, Strategic Management Journal.

[10]  Gerard P. Hodgkinson,et al.  The Cognitive Analysis of Competitive Structures: A Review and Critique , 1997 .

[11]  Chan Su Park,et al.  Surprising Robustness of the Self-Explicated Approach to Customer Preference Structure Measurement , 1997 .

[12]  R. Elliott Existential consumption and irrational desire , 1997 .

[13]  Akihiro Inoue,et al.  Building Market Structures from Consumer Preferences , 1996 .

[14]  J. Pannekoek,et al.  Bootstrapping Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Categorical Data Analysis , 1996 .

[15]  Kenneth R. Lord,et al.  Switching Behavior in Automobile Markets: A Consideration-Sets Model , 1995 .

[16]  Donald G. Morrison,et al.  Making the Cut: Modeling and Analyzing Choice Set Restriction in Scanner Panel Data , 1995 .

[17]  Wayne S. DeSarbo,et al.  The Spatial Representation of Heterogeneous Consideration Sets , 1995 .

[18]  Rick L. Andrews,et al.  Studying Consideration Effects in Empirical Choice Models Using Scanner Panel Data , 1995 .

[19]  G. Kalyanaram,et al.  Brand Retrieval, Consideration Set Composition, Consumer Choice, and the Pioneering Advantage , 1993 .

[20]  J. Leigh,et al.  Symbolic Interactionism: Its Effects on Consumer Behavior and Implications for Marketing Strategy , 1992 .

[21]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Deriving Categories to Achieve Goals , 1991 .

[22]  Hans H. Bauer,et al.  Unternehmensstrategie und Strategische Gruppen , 1991 .

[23]  P. Nedungadi Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets: Influencing Choice without Altering Brand Evaluations , 1990 .

[24]  J. Louviere,et al.  Shopping-center patronage models: Fashioning a consideration set segmentation solution , 1990 .

[25]  John R. Hauser,et al.  The Competitive Implications of Relevant-Set/Response Analysis , 1989 .

[26]  R. Belk Possessions and the Extended Self , 1988 .

[27]  Wayne S. DeSarbo,et al.  Strategy Maps: A Spatial Representation of Intra-Industry Competitive Strategy , 1987 .

[28]  S. Dye,et al.  An evolutionary perspective of the knee. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[29]  Mary Louise Hatten,et al.  Strategic groups, asymmetrical mobility barriers and contestability , 1987 .

[30]  V. Srinivasan,et al.  A Simultaneous Approach to Market Segmentation and Market Structuring , 1987 .

[31]  H. Thomas,et al.  Strategic Groups: Theory, Research and Taxonomy , 1986 .

[32]  L. Barsalou Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  K. R. Harrigan An Application of Clustering for Strategic Group Analysis , 1985 .

[34]  W. Bearden,et al.  Reference Group Influence on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions , 1982 .

[35]  Herman Wold,et al.  Systems under indirect observation : causality, structure, prediction , 1982 .

[36]  R. Belk Determinants of Consumption Cue Utilization in Impression Formation: an Association Derivation and Experimental Verification , 1981 .

[37]  M. Porter The Structure Within Industries and Companies' Performance , 1979 .

[38]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Natural categories: Well defined or fuzzy sets? , 1978 .

[39]  Michael Hunt Competition in the major home appliance industry, 1960-1970 , 1972 .