The Marine Strategy Framework Directive and the ecosystem-based approach – pitfalls and solutions.

The European Marine Strategy Framework Directive aims at good environmental status (GES) in marine waters, following an ecosystem-based approach, focused on 11 descriptors related to ecosystem features, human drivers and pressures. Furthermore, 29 subordinate criteria and 56 attributes are detailed in an EU Commission Decision. The analysis of the Decision and the associated operational indicators revealed ambiguity in the use of terms, such as indicator, impact and habitat and considerable overlap of indicators assigned to various descriptors and criteria. We suggest re-arrangement and elimination of redundant criteria and attributes avoiding double counting in the subsequent indicator synthesis, a clear distinction between pressure and state descriptors and addition of criteria on ecosystem services and functioning. Moreover, we suggest the precautionary principle should be followed for the management of pressures and an evidence-based approach for monitoring state as well as reaching and maintaining GES.

[1]  T. Bouma,et al.  Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning , 2009 .

[2]  C. Duarte,et al.  Changes in the C, N, and P cycles by the predicted salps-krill shift in the southern ocean , 2014, Front. Mar. Sci..

[3]  Jacob Carstensen,et al.  Marine management--towards an integrated implementation of the European Marine Strategy Framework and the Water Framework Directives. , 2010, Marine pollution bulletin.

[4]  Jarrett E. K. Byrnes,et al.  Marine biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: what’s known and what’s next? , 2015 .

[5]  Axel G. Rossberg,et al.  A Complete Analytic Theory for Structure and Dynamics of Populations and Communities Spanning Wide Ranges in Body Size , 2012 .

[6]  D. Pauly.  One hundred million tonnes of fish, and fisheries research , 1996 .

[7]  R. May.  Why Worry about How Many Species and Their Loss? , 2011, PLoS biology.

[8]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges , 2001, Science.

[9]  Cardoso Ana,et al.  Monitoring for the Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Requirements and Options , 2012 .

[10]  K. McLeod,et al.  Confronting the challenges of implementing marine ecosystem‐based management , 2007 .

[11]  M. Elliott,et al.  Marine monitoring: Its shortcomings and mismatch with the EU Water Framework Directive's objectives. , 2006, Marine pollution bulletin.

[12]  Michael Elliott,et al.  The role of the DPSIR approach and conceptual models in marine environmental management: an example for offshore wind power. , 2002, Marine pollution bulletin.

[13]  Joseph N. Boyer,et al.  The EBM-DPSER Conceptual Model: Integrating Ecosystem Services into the DPSIR Framework , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  Cochrane Sabine,et al.  Marine Strategy Framework Directive - Task Group 1 Report Biological Diversity , 2010 .

[15]  Angel Borja,et al.  Marine monitoring during an economic crisis: the cure is worse than the disease. , 2013, Marine pollution bulletin.

[16]  Stephan Gollasch,et al.  Marine Strategy Framework Directive Task Group 2 Report: Non-indigenous species , 2010 .

[17]  Michael Elliott,et al.  How good is good? Human values and Europe's proposed Marine Strategy Directive. , 2008, Marine pollution bulletin.

[18]  Nadia Papadopoulou,et al.  Tales from a thousand and one ways to integrate marine ecosystem components when assessing the environmental status , 2014, Front. Mar. Sci..

[19]  G. Mace,et al.  The 2010 Biodiversity Indicators: Challenges for Science and Policy , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[20]  Mark John Costello.  Distinguishing marine habitat classification concepts for ecological data management , 2009 .

[21]  M. Elliott,et al.  Management of the marine environment: integrating ecosystem services and societal benefits with the DPSIR framework in a systems approach. , 2011, Marine pollution bulletin.

[22]  M. Elliott.  Marine science and management means tackling exogenic unmanaged pressures and endogenic managed pressures--a numbered guide. , 2011, Marine pollution bulletin.

[23]  Desiré Paelinckx,et al.  A concept for biological valuation in the marine environment , 2007 .

[24]  Shahid Naeem,et al.  Species Redundancy and Ecosystem Reliability , 1998 .

[25]  Yolanda Fernández-Torquemada,et al.  Descriptors from Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile meadows in coastal waters of Valencia, Spain, in the context of the EU Water Framework Directive , 2008 .

[26]  M. Elliott.  The 10-tenets for integrated, successful and sustainable marine management. , 2013, Marine pollution bulletin.

[27]  A. Purvis,et al.  Getting the measure of biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[28]  Rodney M. Forster,et al.  Framework for understanding marine ecosystem health , 2013 .

[29]  William G. Lee,et al.  Species redundancy: a redundant concept? , 1996 .

[30]  P. Sutton,et al.  Changes in the global value of ecosystem services , 2014 .

[31]  Jennifer Treuting.  Good is good , 2006, SIGGRAPH '06.

[32]  Karen L. McLeod,et al.  Sea sick? Setting targets to assess ocean health and ecosystem services , 2012 .

[33]  D. Minchin,et al.  MARINE STRATEGY FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE , 2010 .

[34]  Angel Borja,et al.  Good Environmental Status of marine ecosystems: what is it and how do we know when we have attained it? , 2013, Marine pollution bulletin.

[35]  J. Cohen.  Food Webs As A Focus For Unifying Ecological Theory , 2005 .

[36]  Sergej Olenin,et al.  The concept of biotope in marine ecology and coastal management. , 2006, Marine pollution bulletin.

[37]  G. Mace,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[38]  P. Herman,et al.  Existing biodiversity, non-indigenous species, food-web and seafloor integrity GEnS indicators. , 2014 .

[39]  A. Covich,et al.  The Role of Biodiversity in the Functioning of Freshwater and Marine Benthic Ecosystems , 2004 .

[40]  M. Loreau.  Linking biodiversity and ecosystems: towards a unifying ecological theory , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  P. Herman,et al.  The Benthic Ecosystem Quality Index (BEQI), intercalibration and assessment of Dutch coastal and transitional waters for the Water Framework Directive: Final report , 2008 .

[42]  Cochrane Sabine,et al.  Scientific Support to the European Commission on the Marine Strategy Framework Directive - Management Group Report , 2010 .

[43]  Philip Riches,et al.  STANDARDISING THE ASSESSMENT OF CORONAL KNEE LAXITY , 2011 .

[44]  T. Platt,et al.  Patterns of biomass-size spectra from oligotrophic waters of the Northwest Atlantic [review article] , 2003 .

[45]  R. Gregory,et al.  Ten common mistakes in designing biodiversity indicators for forest policy. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[46]  Julie Bremner,et al.  Species' traits and ecological functioning in marine conservation and management , 2008 .

[47]  P. Levin,et al.  Integrated Ecosystem Assessments: Developing the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem-Based Management of the Ocean , 2009, PLoS biology.

[48]  Andrew Gonzalez,et al.  The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. , 2011, American journal of botany.

[49]  S. Thrush,et al.  Standardising the assessment of Functional Integrity in benthic ecosystems , 2015 .

[50]  Jonathan P. Atkins,et al.  Marine ecosystem services: Linking indicators to their classification , 2015 .

[51]  Karen L. McLeod,et al.  The many faces of ecosystem-based management: Making the process work today in real places , 2010 .

[52]  Carrie V. Kappel,et al.  A Global Map of Human Impact on Marine Ecosystems , 2008, Science.

[53]  F. Chapin,et al.  EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .