Context Effects on Melody Recognition: Scale-Step versus Interval Representations

A basic question in cognitive psychology concerns ways in which sensory information is represented in memory. Listeners performed a long-term transposition recognition task in which brief melodies were presented with a chordal context that defined their scale-step interpretations. Context either remained constant or changed at test. In two experiments listeners with moderate amounts of musical experience performed well with constant context but at chance with shifting context. Inexperienced listeners (as well as professionals in one of the studies) performed equally well regardless of context. This result suggests that inexperienced listeners represented melodies as sequences of pitch intervals that remained invariant across context shifts. In contrast, moderately experienced listeners appear to have represented melodies as scale-step sequences that were affected by context. Professionals, while capable of scale-step representation, were able to use a flexible memory-retrieval system to avoid errors with changed context. A third experiment showed that moderately experienced listeners were able to base long-term recognition on either contour or scale-step information, depending on instructions. These results suggest that the scale-step representation used by moderately experienced listeners involved both contour and scale information.

[1]  W. Jay Dowling,et al.  Musical experience and tonal scales in the recognition of octave-scrambled melodies. , 1984 .

[2]  D. Mewhort,et al.  Recognition memory for single tones with and without context. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[3]  J A SWETS,et al.  CENTRAL FACTORS IN AUDITORY FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY. , 1963, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  Diana Deutsch,et al.  9 – The Processing of Pitch Combinations , 1982 .

[5]  Ragnhild Söderbergh Language by ear and by eye , 1975, Journal of Child Language.

[6]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Recognition of transposed melodies: a key-distance effect in developmental perspective. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  W. Dowling,et al.  Contour, interval, and pitch recognition in memory for melodies. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  D. Deutsch,et al.  The Psychology of Music , 1983 .

[9]  F. Attneave,et al.  Pitch as a medium: a new approach to psychophysical scaling. , 1971, The American journal of psychology.

[10]  R. Francès La perception de la musique , 1958 .

[11]  Richard L. Venezky,et al.  Orthography, reading, and dyslexia , 1980 .

[12]  W. Jay Dowling,et al.  13 – Melodic Information Processing and Its Development , 1982 .

[13]  R. Shepard,et al.  Retention of information under conditions approaching a steady state. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  D. Deutsch,et al.  Octave generalization and the consolidation of melodic information. , 1979, Canadian journal of psychology.

[15]  R. Shepard,et al.  Quantification of the hierarchy of tonal functions within a diatonic context. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  W. Jay Dowling,et al.  Recognition of transposed melodies: a key-distance effect in developmental perspective. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  W. Dowling Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies. , 1978 .

[18]  D. Deutsch Music recognition. , 1969, Psychological review.

[19]  J. Bartlett,et al.  PSYCHOMUSICOLOGY Spring 1981 THE IMPORTANCE OF 'INTERVAL INFORMATION IN LONG-TERM MEMORY FOR MELODIES , 1981 .