Delayed reinforcement and delayed choice in symbolic matching to sample: Effects on stimulus discriminability.

Six pigeons were trained to peck a red side key when the brighter of two white lights (S(1)) had been presented on the center key, and to peck a green side key when the dimmer of two white lights (S(2)) had been presented on the center key. Equal frequencies of reinforcers were provided for the two types of correct choice. Incorrect choices, red side-key pecks following S(2) presentations and green side-key pecks following S(1) presentations, resulted in blackout. With 0-s delay between choice and reinforcement, the delay between sample presentation and choice was varied from 0 to 20 s. Then, with 0-s delay between sample presentation and choice, the delay between choice and reinforcement was varied from 0 to 20 s. Both types of delay resulted in decreased discriminability (defined in terms of a signal-detection analysis) of the center-key stimuli, but delayed choice had more effect on discriminability than did delayed reinforcement. These data are consistent with the view that the two kinds of delay operate differently. The effect of a sample-choice delay may result from a degradation of the conditional discriminative stimuli during the delay; the effect of a choice-reinforcer delay may result from a decrement in control by differential reinforcement.

[1]  D. Stubbs,et al.  Response bias and the discrimination of stimulus duration. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  D. Mccarthy,et al.  Reinforcement for errors in a signal-detection procedure. , 1980, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  M. Davison,et al.  Towards a behavioral theory of bias in signal detection , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  William S. Maki,et al.  Short-Term Memory for Stimuli, Responses, and Reinforcers. , 1977 .

[5]  Disruption of overlearned discriminative behavior in monkeys (Cebus paella) by delay of reward , 1977 .

[6]  M. Davison,et al.  Signal probability, reinforcement and signal detection. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  The effect of sample and comparison ratio schedules on delayed matching to sample in the pigeon , 1978 .

[8]  K G White,et al.  Delayed stimulus control: recall for single and relational stimuli. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  A C Catania,et al.  Short-term remembering of discriminative stimuli in pigeons. , 1980, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  R J Summers,et al.  Effect of delay-interval stimuli on delayed symbolic matching to sample in the pigeon. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  D McCarthy,et al.  Isobias and alloiobias functions in animal psycophysics. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[12]  M. Davison,et al.  Stimulus discriminability, contingency discriminability, and schedule performance , 1985 .

[13]  W M Baum,et al.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  D. Stubbs,et al.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  J. Nevin,et al.  Differential reinforcement and signal detection. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[16]  F. R. Ruckdeschel Basic Scientific Subroutines , 1981 .

[17]  M C Davison,et al.  The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[18]  D. Mccarthy Measures of response bias at minimum-detectable luminance levels in the pigeon. , 1983, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[19]  R. Gnanadesikan,et al.  Nonparametric Trend Analysis. A Practical Guide for Research Workers , 1965 .

[20]  D. Wilkie Delayed Symbolic Matching to Sample in the Pigeon , 1978 .

[21]  D McCarthy,et al.  Delayed signal detection, differential reinforcement, and short-term memory in the pigeon. , 1984, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[22]  D. Mccarthy,et al.  Independence of sensitivity to relative reinforcement rate and discriminability in signal detection. , 1980, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.