Rapid and accurate processing of multiple objects in briefly presented scenes.

Humans can detect multiple objects in briefly presented natural visual scenes, but the mechanisms through which the objects are segmented from the background and consciously accessed remain open. By asking participants to report how many humans natural photos presented for 50 ms contain, we show that up to three items can be rapidly enumerated from natural scenes without compromising speed or accuracy. In contrast to standard parallel and serial models of object selection, our results revealed that the participants were fastest in enumerating two objects; even enumerating one single item required additional processing time. Also enumeration accuracy slightly increased in the subitizing range as number increased. Our results suggest that the visual system is tuned to process multiple items, which may underlie spatial and numerical cognition, and be beneficial in real-world situations that often require dealing with more than one object at a time.

[1]  S. Thorpe,et al.  How parallel is visual processing in the ventral pathway? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Natural Number and Natural Geometry , 2011 .

[3]  George A. Alvarez,et al.  Natural-Scene Perception Requires Attention , 2011, Psychological science.

[4]  Henry Railo,et al.  The role of attention in subitizing , 2008, Cognition.

[5]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[6]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Does Subitizing Reflect Numerical Estimation? , 2022 .

[7]  Sarah Walker,et al.  Ultra-rapid categorization requires visual attention: Scenes with multiple foreground objects. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[8]  R. Rafal,et al.  "Both" means more than "two": localizing and counting in patients with visuospatial neglect , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  P. Perona,et al.  What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene? , 2007, Journal of vision.

[10]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[12]  Henry Railo,et al.  Bilateral and two-item advantage in subitizing , 2014, Vision Research.

[13]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Processing of one, two or four natural scenes in humans: the limits of parallelism , 2004, Vision Research.

[14]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[15]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[16]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  Early visual tagging: effects of target-distractor similarity and old age on search, subitization, and counting. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  J. Trueswell,et al.  Getting the gist of events: recognition of two-participant actions from brief displays. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  A. Treisman,et al.  Perception of objects in natural scenes: is it really attention free? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Bahador Bahrami,et al.  Modulating Attentional Load Affects Numerosity Estimation: Evidence against a Pre-Attentive Subitizing Mechanism , 2008, PloS one.

[20]  G. Alvarez.  Representing multiple objects as an ensemble enhances visual cognition , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  P. Perona,et al.  Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[23]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Anatomical constraints on attention: hemifield independence is a signature of multifocal spatial selection. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[25]  E. Spelke,et al.  Core Knowledge of Geometry in an Amazonian Indigene Group , 2006, Science.

[26]  C. Koch,et al.  Competition and selection during visual processing of natural scenes and objects. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[27]  D. Melcher,et al.  Subitizing reflects visuo-spatial object individuation capacity , 2011, Cognition.

[28]  Michel Vidal-Naquet,et al.  Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[30]  G. Mandler,et al.  Subitizing: an analysis of its component processes. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  Binding is a local problem for natural objects and scenes , 2005, Vision Research.

[32]  W. STANLEY JEVONS,et al.  The Power of Numerical Discrimination , 1871, Nature.

[33]  P. Perona,et al.  Why does natural scene categorization require little attention? Exploring attentional requirements for natural and synthetic stimuli , 2005 .

[34]  N. Cowan.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[35]  E. L. Kaufman,et al.  The discrimination of visual number. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[36]  Greg O. Horne,et al.  Controlling low-level image properties: The SHINE toolbox , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[37]  Ruth Kimchi,et al.  Figure-Ground Segmentation Can Occur Without Attention , 2008, Psychological science.

[38]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[39]  Susan Carey,et al.  Spontaneous representations of small numbers of objects by rhesus macaques: Examinations of content and format , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[40]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[41]  George Mandler,et al.  The Limit of Mental Structures , 2013, The Journal of general psychology.

[42]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.