Large-scale virtual screening for discovering leads in the postgenomic era

Virtual screening, or in silico screening, is a new approach attracting increasing levels of interest in the pharmaceutical industry as a productive and cost-effective technology in the search for novel lead compounds. Although the principles involved--the computational analysis of chemical databases to identify compounds appropriate for a given biological receptor--have been pursued for several years in molecular modeling groups, the availability of inexpensive high-performance computing platforms has transformed the process so that increasingly complex and more accurate analyses can be performed on very large data sets. The virtual screening technology of Protherics Molecular Design Ltd. is based on its integrated software environment for receptor-based drug design, called Prometheus. In particular, molecular docking is used to predict the binding modes and binding affinities of every compound in the data set to a given biological receptor. This method represents a very detailed and relevant basis for prioritizing compounds for biological screening. This paper discusses the broader scope of virtual screening and, as an example, describes our recent work in docking one million compounds into the estrogen hormone receptor in order to highlight the technical feasibility of performing very large-scale virtual screening as a route to identifying novel drug leads.

[1]  J. Dodge,et al.  Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). , 1970, Current pharmaceutical design.

[2]  G. V. Paolini,et al.  Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[3]  D. Kostrewa,et al.  Novel inhibitors of DNA gyrase: 3D structure based biased needle screening, hit validation by biophysical methods, and 3D guided optimization. A promising alternative to random screening. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[4]  I D Kuntz,et al.  Rational design of selective submicromolar inhibitors of Tritrichomonas foetus hypoxanthine-guanine-xanthine phosphoribosyltransferase. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[5]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Identification of ligands for RNA targets via structure-based virtual screening: HIV-1 TAR , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[6]  Shiochet Bk,et al.  The role of macromolecular crystallography and structure for drug discovery: advances and caveats. , 2000 .

[7]  Zbigniew Dauter,et al.  Molecular basis of agonism and antagonism in the oestrogen receptor , 1997, Nature.

[8]  C. Southan,et al.  The impact of genomics on drug discovery. , 2000, Progress in medicinal chemistry.

[9]  J. Drews Drug discovery: a historical perspective. , 2000, Science.

[10]  D E Bussiere,et al.  Structural genomics in the post-genomics era - the shapes of things to come. , 2000, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[11]  Ramesha,et al.  How many leads from HTS? - Comment. , 2000, Drug discovery today.

[12]  P Burkhard,et al.  The discovery of steroids and other novel FKBP inhibitors using a molecular docking program. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  Yuan-Ping Pang,et al.  Successful virtual screening of a chemical database for farnesyltransferase inhibitor leads. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[14]  W. Guida,et al.  The art and practice of structure‐based drug design: A molecular modeling perspective , 1996, Medicinal research reviews.

[15]  D. E. Clark,et al.  Flexible docking using tabu search and an empirical estimate of binding affinity , 1998, Proteins.

[16]  N. Koszewski,et al.  Hormone- and DNA-binding mechanisms of the recombinant human estrogen receptor. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[17]  Pickett,et al.  Computational methods for the prediction of 'drug-likeness' , 2000, Drug discovery today.

[18]  J J Baldwin,et al.  Application of the three-dimensional structures of protein target molecules in structure-based drug design. , 1994, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[19]  B Cox,et al.  Application of high-throughput screening techniques to drug discovery. , 2000, Progress in medicinal chemistry.

[20]  Lahana,et al.  How many leads from HTS? , 1999, Drug discovery today.

[21]  Tim D. J. Perkins,et al.  New Approach to Molecular Docking and Its Application to Virtual Screening of Chemical Databases , 2000, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[22]  I D Kuntz,et al.  Inhibitors of kinesin activity from structure-based computer screening. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[23]  D E Bussiere,et al.  The role of macromolecular crystallography and structure for drug discovery: advances and caveats. , 2000, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[24]  B K Shoichet,et al.  Structure-based discovery and in-parallel optimization of novel competitive inhibitors of thymidylate synthase. , 1999, Chemistry & biology.

[25]  S J Ward,et al.  Impact of genomics in drug discovery. , 2001, BioTechniques.

[26]  M. Murcko,et al.  Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[27]  V. Jordan,et al.  Basic guide to the mechanisms of antiestrogen action. , 1998, Pharmacological reviews.

[28]  R Abagyan,et al.  Rational discovery of novel nuclear hormone receptor antagonists , 2000, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[29]  F. Lombardo,et al.  Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[30]  Mark A. Murcko,et al.  Virtual screening : an overview , 1998 .