Continuous auditory feedback on the status of adaptive cruise control, lane deviation, and time headway: An acceptable support for truck drivers?

The number of trucks that are equipped with driver assistance systems is increasing. These driver assistance systems typically offer binary auditory warnings or notifications upon lane departure, close headway, or automation (de)activation. Such binary sounds may annoy the driver if presented frequently. Truck drivers are well accustomed to the sound of the engine and wind in the cabin. Based on the premise that continuous sounds are more natural than binary warnings, we propose continuous auditory feedback on the status of adaptive cruise control, lane offset, and headway, which blends with the engine and wind sounds that are already present in the cabin. An on-road study with 23 truck drivers was performed, where participants were presented with the additional sounds in isolation from each other and in combination. Results showed that the sounds were easy to understand and that the lane-offset sound was regarded as somewhat useful. Systems with feedback on the status of adaptive cruise control and headway were seen as not useful. Participants overall preferred a silent cabin and expressed displeasure with the idea of being presented with extra sounds on a continuous basis. Suggestions are provided for designing less intrusive continuous auditory feedback.

[1]  Gérard Borello Predicting Noise Transmission in a Truck Cabin Using the Statistical Energy Analysis Approach , 1999 .

[2]  S. Dornič,et al.  Continuous Noise, Intermittent Noise, and Annoyance , 1989, Perceptual and motor skills.

[3]  Zeki Kiral,et al.  Interior acoustics of a truck cabin with hard and impedance surfaces , 1999 .

[4]  Ralf Schweizer Human Factors In Alarm Design , 2016 .

[5]  Fang Chen,et al.  Listen! There Are Other Road Users Close to You - Improve the Traffic Awareness of Truck Drivers , 2007, HCI.

[6]  Jamie R. McDevitt,et al.  When technology tells you how you drive--truck drivers' attitudes towards feedback by technology , 2003 .

[7]  Steven E Shladover,et al.  OVERVIEW OF PLATOONING SYSTEMS , 2012 .

[8]  A. Bregman,et al.  Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  P A Hancock,et al.  Alarm effectiveness in driver-centred collision-warning systems. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[10]  G. R. Janssen,et al.  Truck platooning: driving the future of transportation , 2015 .

[11]  Dick de Waard,et al.  A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics , 1997 .

[12]  J. Blauert Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization , 1983 .

[13]  M. Björkman,et al.  Annoyance due to low frequency noise and the use of the dB(A) scale , 1988 .

[14]  A. Behar Measurement of noise inside truck cabins , 1981 .

[15]  Davide Rocchesso,et al.  Continuous sonic feedback from a rolling ball , 2005, IEEE MultiMedia.

[16]  T Lindvall,et al.  Scaling loudness, noisiness, and annoyance of aircraft noise. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Ian J Reagan,et al.  Driver trust in five driver assistance technologies following real-world use in four production vehicles , 2017, Traffic injury prevention.

[18]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  How in the World Did We Ever Get into That Mode? Mode Error and Awareness in Supervisory Control , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[19]  Amiya R Mohanty,et al.  Structure-borne noise reduction in a truck cab interior using numerical techniques , 2000 .

[20]  Ali Karimi,et al.  Noise induced hearing loss risk assessment in truck drivers. , 2010, Noise & health.

[21]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  A 3D-auditory environment for hierarchical navigation in non-visual interaction , 1996 .