Question/answer techniques within CAD environments: An Investigation about the most Effective Interfaces

AbstractThe paper aims at exploring the opportunities for improving the Human Computer Interaction (HCI) of Computer-Aided systems for supporting designers in carrying out the early stages of the Product Development Process (PDP). In details, the authors stem from the analysis of the latest advancements and issues in the field of Question and Answer techniques, which they have already implemented in algorithms for supporting the analysis of inventive problems. According to the analysis, they identify two basic directions to improve the HCI in such systems. Literature evidences concerning the different approach of designers according to their experience point out the need of producing more flexible systems, tailored for both skilled individuals and novices. Moreover, the need emerges to both foster creativity with meaningful stimuli and introducing pictorial communication within a dialogue flow, so as to follow the common cognitive path emerged by the analysis of design protocols. The discussion shows that...

[1]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[2]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Structure of Ill Structured Problems , 1973, Artif. Intell..

[3]  G. Altshuller.  Creativity as an exact science : the theory of the solution of inventive problems , 1984 .

[4]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[5]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design , 1994 .

[6]  Ömer Akin,et al.  Frames of reference in architectural design: analysing the hyperacclamation (A-h-a-!) , 1996 .

[7]  M. Göker.  The effects of experience during design problem solving , 1997 .

[8]  Paul Rodgers,et al.  Visible ideas:Information patterns of conceptual sketch activity , 1998 .

[9]  John S. Gero,et al.  Drawings and the design process , 1998 .

[10]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes , 1999 .

[11]  Anne Römer,et al.  External Support of Problem Analysis in Design Problem Solving , 2000 .

[12]  Kokotovich,et al.  Ideas and the Embodiment of Ideas and Drawing: An experimental investigation of inventing , 2001 .

[13]  P.-H Won,et al.  The Comparison between Visual Thinking Using Computer and Conventional Media in the Concept Generation Stages of Design , 2001, CAADRIA proceedings.

[14]  Tong Li,et al.  Information visualization for intelligent decision support systems , 2001, Knowl. Based Syst..

[15]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Information seeking in social context: structural influences and receipt of information benefits , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[16]  PENG-WHAI Won.  THE COMPARISON BETWEEN VISUAL THINKING USING COMPUTER AND CONVENTIONAL MEDIA IN THE CONCEPT GENERATION STAGES OF DESIGN , 2001 .

[17]  Ralph O. Buchal,et al.  Sketching and computer-aided conceptual design , 2002, The 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design.

[18]  John S. Gero,et al.  The Situated Function - Behaviour - Structure Framework , 2002, AID.

[19]  Halime Demirkan,et al.  An insight on designers’ sketching activities in traditional versus digital media , 2003 .

[20]  Gaetano Cascini.  State-of-the-art and Trends of Computer-Aided Innovation Tools - Towards the integration within the Product Development Cycle , 2004, IFIP Congress Topical Sessions.

[21]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  AutoTutor: an intelligent tutoring system with mixed-initiative dialogue , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[22]  Hh Henri Achten,et al.  Do word graphs stimulate design , 2005 .

[23]  Ben Jonson,et al.  Design ideation: the conceptual sketch in the digital age , 2005 .

[24]  Todd Lubart,et al.  How can computers be partners in the creative process: Classification and commentary on the Special Issue , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[25]  John S. Gero,et al.  To sketch or not to sketch? That is the question , 2006 .

[26]  J. Gero,et al.  The impact of working memory limitations on the design process during conceptualization , 2007 .

[27]  A. Dong.  The enactment of design through language , 2007 .

[28]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  Practical approaches to comforting users with relational agents , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[29]  Claudia T. Melear,et al.  Proliferation of inscriptions and transformations among preservice science teachers engaged in authentic science , 2007 .

[30]  Vasilije Kokotovich,et al.  Problem analysis and thinking tools: an empirical study of non-hierarchical mind mapping , 2008 .

[31]  Mi Jeong Kim,et al.  The impact of tangible user interfaces on spatial cognition during collaborative design , 2008 .

[32]  Judi McCuaig,et al.  Adaptive Tips for Helping Domain Experts , 2009, UMAP.

[33]  Manuel Contero,et al.  Computer-aided sketching as a tool to promote innovation in the new product development process , 2009, Comput. Ind..

[34]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Concept Diagramming Software for Engineering Design Support: A Review and Synthesis of Studies , 2009 .

[35]  Qinglin Guo,et al.  Semantic information integration and question answering based on pervasive agent ontology , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[36]  Noel León Rovira.  The future of computer-aided innovation , 2009, Comput. Ind..

[37]  Roberto Pirrone,et al.  Improving Assessment of Students through Semantic Space Construction , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems.

[38]  Margaret A. Boden,et al.  Computer Models of Creativity , 2009, AI Mag..

[39]  Pao-Nan Chou,et al.  The Effect of Static Visual Instruction on Students' Online Learning: A Pilot Study , 2010 .

[40]  Ellen Yi-Luen Do,et al.  Extended linkography and distance graph in design evaluation: an empirical study of the dual effects of inspiration sources in creative design , 2010 .

[41]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  The use of creative stimuli at early stages of industrial product innovation , 2010 .

[42]  Judi McCuaig,et al.  Detecting Learner Frustration: Towards Mainstream Use Cases , 2010, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[43]  Marc Cavazza,et al.  Interaction Strategies for an Affective Conversational Agent , 2011, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[44]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Not from Scratch: The DMS Model of Design Creativity , 2011 .

[45]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  DANE: Fostering Creativity in and through Biologically Inspired Design , 2011 .

[46]  John S. Gero,et al.  Comparing collaborative co-located and distributed design processes in digital and traditional sketching environments: A protocol study using the function-behaviour-structure coding scheme , 2011 .

[47]  Federico Rotini,et al.  Computer-Aided Problem Solving - Part 1: Objectives, Approaches, Opportunities , 2011, IFIP CAI.

[48]  Rahinah Ibrahim,et al.  Impacts of VR 3D sketching on novice designers’ spatial cognition in collaborative conceptual architectural design , 2011 .

[49]  Marc Cavazza,et al.  Interaction Strategies for an Affective Conversational Agent , 2010, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[50]  Federico Rotini,et al.  Computer-Aided Problem Solving - Part 2: A Dialogue-Based System to Support the Analysis of Inventive Problems , 2011, IFIP CAI.

[51]  T. Taura,et al.  Discussion on Direction of Design Creativity Research (Part 2) - Research Issues and Methodologies: From the Viewpoint of Deep Feelings and Desirable Figure , 2011 .

[52]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  Using Evolved Analogies to Overcome Creative Design Fixation , 2011 .

[53]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  PHYSICAL EXAMPLES IN ENGINEERING IDEA GENERATION: AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION , 2012 .

[54]  Federico Rotini,et al.  Model and algorithm for computer-aided inventive problem analysis , 2012, Comput. Aided Des..

[55]  Antonella De Angeli,et al.  Gender affordances of conversational agents , 2012, Interacting with computers.

[56]  Gaetano Cascini,et al.  Mapping Causal Relationships and Conflicts among Design Parameters and System Requirements , 2013 .

[57]  Federico Rotini,et al.  About the Introduction of a Dialogue-Based Interaction within CAD Systems , 2013 .

[58]  Federico Rotini,et al.  Assessing the Performance of Computerized Tools for Inventive Design: Insights From Unsatisfactory Outcomes , 2013 .

[59]  Federico Rotini,et al.  A TRIZ-based CAI Framework to guide Engineering Students towards a Broad-spectrum Investigation of Inventive Technical Problems , 2013 .