Bayesian inference for a principal stratum estimand to assess the treatment effect in a subgroup characterized by postrandomization event occurrence

The treatment effect in subgroups of patients is often of interest in randomized controlled clinical trials, as this may provide useful information on how to treat which patients best. When a specific subgroup is characterized by the absence of certain events that happen postrandomization, a naive analysis on the subset of patients without these events may be misleading. The principal stratification framework allows one to define an appropriate causal estimand in such settings. Statistical inference for the principal stratum estimand hinges on scientifically justified assumptions, which can be included with Bayesian methods through prior distributions. Our motivating example is a large randomized placebo-controlled trial of siponimod in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. The primary objective of this trial was to demonstrate the efficacy of siponimod relative to placebo in delaying disability progression for the whole study population. However, the treatment effect in the subgroup of patients who would not relapse during the trial is relevant from both a scientific and patient perspective. Assessing this subgroup treatment effect is challenging as there is strong evidence that siponimod reduces relapses. We describe in detail the scientific question of interest, the principal stratum estimand, the corresponding analysis method for binary endpoints, and sensitivity analyses. Although our work is motivated by a randomized clinical trial, the approach has broader appeal and could be adapted for observational studies.

[1]  David Lindley,et al.  Bayesian Statistics, a Review , 1987 .

[2]  F. Bretz,et al.  Estimands and Their Role in Clinical Trials , 2017 .

[3]  P. Libby,et al.  Relationship of C-reactive protein reduction to cardiovascular event reduction following treatment with canakinumab: a secondary analysis from the CANTOS randomised controlled trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[4]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .

[5]  D. Mehrotra,et al.  Seeking harmony: estimands and sensitivity analyses for confirmatory clinical trials , 2016, Clinical trials.

[6]  Alessandra Mattei,et al.  Bayesian inference for causal mechanisms with application to a randomized study for postoperative pain control , 2017, Biostatistics.

[7]  D. Rubin Causal Inference Through Potential Outcomes and Principal Stratification: Application to Studies with “Censoring” Due to Death , 2006, math/0612783.

[8]  C H Mallinckrodt,et al.  A structured approach to choosing estimands and estimators in longitudinal clinical trials , 2012, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[9]  R. Giugliano,et al.  Achievement of Dual Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Targets More Frequent With the Addition of Ezetimibe to Simvastatin and Associated With Better Outcomes in IMPROVE-IT , 2015, Circulation.

[10]  Norbert Benda,et al.  Choosing Appropriate Estimands in Clinical Trials , 2015, Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science.

[11]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations , 1998 .

[12]  Joshua D. Angrist,et al.  Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables , 1993 .

[13]  Bernhard Hemmer,et al.  Siponimod for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (BOLD): an adaptive, dose-ranging, randomised, phase 2 study , 2013, The Lancet Neurology.

[14]  Morten Wang Fagerland,et al.  Outcome based subgroup analysis: a neglected concern , 2009, Trials.

[15]  S. Ruberg,et al.  Estimands in clinical trials – broadening the perspective , 2017, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  Baldur P Magnusson,et al.  Siponimod: Disentangling disability and relapses in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis , 2020, Multiple sclerosis.

[17]  B. Egleston,et al.  A tutorial on principal stratification-based sensitivity analysis: application to smoking cessation studies , 2010, Clinical trials.

[18]  J. Wittes,et al.  Analysis and interpretation of treatment effects in subgroups of patients in randomized clinical trials. , 1991, JAMA.

[19]  Ludwig Kappos,et al.  Siponimod versus placebo in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (EXPAND): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study , 2018, The Lancet.

[20]  Björn Bornkamp,et al.  Estimating the Treatment Effect in a Subgroup Defined by an Early Post-Baseline Biomarker Measurement in Randomized Clinical Trials With Time-To-Event Endpoint , 2018, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research.

[21]  Jiqiang Guo,et al.  Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language. , 2017, Journal of statistical software.

[22]  D. Rubin Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. , 1974 .

[23]  Jiannan Lu,et al.  Principal stratification analysis using principal scores , 2016, 1602.01196.

[24]  Thomas Permutt,et al.  A taxonomy of estimands for regulatory clinical trials with discontinuations , 2016, Statistics in medicine.

[25]  T. Speed,et al.  On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 9 , 1990 .

[26]  Haitao Chu,et al.  On estimation of vaccine efficacy using validation samples with selection bias. , 2006, Biostatistics.

[27]  D. Rubin,et al.  Principal Stratification in Causal Inference , 2002, Biometrics.

[28]  R. Uzzo,et al.  Latent Class Survival Models Linked by Principal Stratification to Investigate Heterogenous Survival Subgroups Among Individuals With Early-Stage Kidney Cancer , 2017, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[29]  Roderick Little,et al.  Intention‐to‐treat analysis with treatment discontinuation and missing data in clinical trials , 2015, Statistics in medicine.