European DEMO design strategy and consequences for materials

Demonstrating the production of net electricity and operating with a closed fuel-cycle remain unarguably the crucial steps towards the exploitation of fusion power. These are the aims of a demonstration fusion reactor (DEMO) proposed to be built after ITER. This paper briefly describes the DEMO design options that are being considered in Europe for the current conceptual design studies as part of the Roadmap to Fusion Electricity Horizon 2020. These are not intended to represent fixed and exclusive design choices but rather ‘proxies’ of possible plant design options to be used to identify generic design/material issues that need to be resolved in future fusion reactor systems. The materials nuclear design requirements and the effects of radiation damage are briefly analysed with emphasis on a pulsed ‘low extrapolation’ system, which is being used for the initial design integration studies, based as far as possible on mature technologies and reliable regimes of operation (to be extrapolated from the ITER experience), and on the use of materials suitable for the expected level of neutron fluence. The main technical issues arising from the plasma and nuclear loads and the effects of radiation damage particularly on the structural and heat sink materials of the vessel and in-vessel components are critically discussed. The need to establish realistic target performance and a development schedule for near-term electricity production tends to favour more conservative technology choices. The readiness of the technical (physics and technology) assumptions that are being made is expected to be an important factor for the selection of the technical features of the device.

[1]  David Ward,et al.  On the physics guidelines for a tokamak DEMO , 2013 .

[2]  R. Vetter.  ICRP Publication 103, The Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection , 2008 .

[3]  M. Coleman,et al.  On the EU approach for DEMO architecture exploration and dealing with uncertainties , 2016 .

[4]  M. Kalsey,et al.  Structural integrity for DEMO: An opportunity to close the gap from materials science to engineering needs , 2016 .

[5]  Christian Bachmann,et al.  Neutronics studies for the design of the European DEMO vacuum vessel , 2016 .

[6]  G. Marbach,et al.  Safety and Environmental Impact of Fusion , 2001 .

[7]  S. M. González de Vicente,et al.  Functional materials for tokamak in-vessel systems—status and developments , 2017 .

[8]  S. Zinkle,et al.  Development of benchmark reduced activation ferritic/martensitic steels for fusion energy applications , 2017 .

[9]  David Ward,et al.  “PROCESS”: A systems code for fusion power plants—Part 1: Physics , 2014 .

[10]  Jarir Aktaa,et al.  Structural Design Criteria Development Needs for a European DEMO , 2014 .

[11]  E. R. Hodgson,et al.  Chapter 12: Generic Diagnostic Issues for a Burning Plasma Experiment , 2008 .

[12]  Massimiliano Mattei,et al.  Advances in the physics basis for the European DEMO design , 2015 .

[13]  Reinhard Pippan,et al.  Development of advanced high heat flux and plasma-facing materials , 2017 .

[14]  H. Tsige-Tamirat,et al.  Model Generation and Neutronic Design Analyses for the European DEMO Conceptual Study , 2009 .

[15]  G. Federici,et al.  Conceptual design studies for the European DEMO divertor: Rationale and first results , 2016 .

[16]  Thomas Hamacher,et al.  Is nuclear fusion a sustainable energy form , 2011 .

[17]  M. Gadomska,et al.  Overview of EU DEMO design and R&D activities , 2014 .

[18]  P. F. Morris,et al.  Developing structural, high-heat flux and plasma facing materials for a near-term DEMO fusion power plant: The EU assessment , 2014, 1408.3546.

[19]  T. Franke,et al.  Overview of the design approach and prioritization of R&D activities towards an EU DEMO , 2016 .

[20]  P. Calderoni,et al.  Current design of the European TBM systems and implications on DEMO breeding blanket , 2016 .

[21]  Steven J. Zinkle,et al.  Materials RD for a timely DEMO: Key findings and recommendations of the EU Roadmap Materials Assessment Group , 2014 .

[22]  B. Giraud,et al.  Codes and standards and regulation issues for design and construction of the ITER mechanical components , 2010 .

[23]  Z. Vizvary,et al.  Balance of plant challenges for a near-term EU demonstration power plant , 2013, 2013 IEEE 25th Symposium on Fusion Engineering (SOFE).

[24]  J. Linke,et al.  Material testing facilities and programs for plasma-facing component testing , 2017 .

[25]  Steven J. Zinkle,et al.  Materials testing facilities and programmes for fission and ion implantation damage , 2017 .

[26]  C. E. Kessel.  Fusion Nuclear Science Pathways Assessment , 2012 .

[28]  F. Wagner.  Fusion Energy by Magnetic Confinement , 2014 .

[29]  Hans K. Fauske,et al.  Boiling Heat Transfer and Two-Phase Flow , 1966 .

[30]  G. Robert Odette,et al.  On the effects of irradiation and helium on the yield stress changes and hardening and non-hardening embrittlement of ∼8Cr tempered martensitic steels : Compilation and analysis of existing data , 2006 .

[31]  G. Federici,et al.  The application of systems engineering principles to the European DEMO design and R&D studies , 2013, 2013 IEEE 25th Symposium on Fusion Engineering (SOFE).

[32]  S. Dudarev,et al.  An integrated model for materials in a fusion power plant: transmutation, gas production, and helium embrittlement under neutron irradiation , 2012 .

[33]  W. Kerner,et al.  High fusion performance from deuterium-tritium plasmas in JET , 1999 .

[34]  Peng Fu,et al.  Concept Design of CFETR Tokamak Machine , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[36]  Ronald Wenninger,et al.  DEMO diagnostics and burn control , 2015 .

[37]  Colin English,et al.  Lessons learnt from fission materials R&D programmes , 2017 .

[38]  R. Neu,et al.  DEMO divertor limitations during and in between ELMs , 2014 .

[39]  C. H. Skinner,et al.  Plasma-material interactions in current tokamaks and their implications for next step fusion reactors , 2001 .

[40]  P. Sardain,et al.  Objectives and status of EUROfusion DEMO blanket studies , 2016 .

[41]  A. R. Raffray,et al.  Breeding blanket concepts for fusion and materials requirements , 2002 .

[42]  P. Richardson,et al.  Boiling heat transfer and two-phase flow , 1956 .

[43]  Bob Lightsey,et al.  Systems Engineering Fundamentals , 2001 .

[44]  Steven J. Zinkle,et al.  Towards a programme of testing and qualification for structural and plasma-facing materials in ‘fusion neutron’ environments , 2017 .

[45]  M. Merola,et al.  Critical heat flux analysis and R&D for the design of the ITER divertor , 1999 .

[46]  P. Barabaschi,et al.  Fusion electricity: a roadmap to the realization of fusion energy , 2012 .

[47]  M. Coleman,et al.  Issues and strategies for DEMO in-vessel component integration , 2016 .

[48]  P. Sardain,et al.  Power plant conceptual studies in Europe , 2007 .

[49]  S. Zinkle,et al.  Tensile and fracture toughness properties of neutron-irradiated CuCrZr , 2009 .

[50]  X. Litaudon,et al.  European roadmap to the realization of fusion energy: Mission for solution on heat-exhaust systems , 2015 .

[51]  L. Giancarli,et al.  A conceptual study of commercial fusion power plants. Final report of the European Fusion Power Plant Conceptual Study (PPCS) , 2005 .

[52]  A. D. Turnbull,et al.  An Evaluation of Fusion Energy R&D Gaps Using Technology Readiness Levels , 2009 .

[53]  Minami Yoda,et al.  The ARIES Advanced and Conservative Tokamak Power Plant Study , 2014 .

[54]  S. Dudarev,et al.  Neutron-induced dpa, transmutations, gas production, and helium embrittlement of fusion materials , 2013, 1311.5079.

[55]  F. Maviglia,et al.  DEMO exhaust challenges beyond ITER , 2015 .

[56]  Mikio Enoeda,et al.  Functional materials for breeding blankets—status and developments , 2017 .

[57]  Neill Taylor,et al.  Lessons learnt from ITER safety & licensing for DEMO and future nuclear fusion facilities , 2014 .

[58]  Mark R. Gilbert,et al.  Baseline high heat flux and plasma facing materials for fusion , 2017 .

[59]  Frederic Escourbiac,et al.  Engineering challenges and development of the ITER Blanket System and Divertor , 2015 .

[60]  G. Federici,et al.  A roadmap to the realisationof fusion energy: – mission for solutions on heat-exhaust systems , 2014 .

[61]  S. Zinkle,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on the technical status of materials for a fusion reactor , 2017 .

[62]  Laila A. El-Guebaly,et al.  Materials-related issues in the safety and licensing of nuclear fusion facilities , 2017 .

[63]  Steven J. Zinkle,et al.  Development of next generation tempered and ODS reduced activation ferritic/martensitic steels for fusion energy applications , 2017 .