Analysis of content charge by ISPs

When rich content is delivered, a huge amount of traffic is transmitted over the network. For ISPs, the increase in investment cost that is required to maintain stable quality is a problem. ISPs need content providers to cover the investment cost because increase in the user fees may not be accepted by the users. However, content providers usually pay an access fee where the increase ratio diminishes as the volume of the data transmitted increases. Therefore, ISPs cannot obtain enough profit to cover the required investment costs. For this problem, content charge, in which ISPs charge content providers for each content delivery, seems effective. This work models the business relationship between ISPs and content providers, and we investigate the conditions for introducing the content charge by the ISPs. We also investigate the effects of content charge on the revenue of the ISPs by numerically comparing the content charge and the transit charge. We show that major ISPs in Japan can expect to increase their monthly income from about 100,000 USD to about one million USD when the charging ratio of content charge is set to 20%.

[1]  E. Petajan,et al.  The US HDTV standard , 1995 .

[2]  Jon Crowcroft,et al.  Net neutrality: the technical side of the debate: a white paper , 2007, CCRV.

[3]  Vishal Misra,et al.  Internet Economics: The Use of Shapley Value for ISP Settlement , 2007, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[4]  Vishal Misra,et al.  Interconnecting eyeballs to content: a shapley value perspective on isp peering and settlement , 2008, NetEcon '08.

[5]  A. Robert Calderbank,et al.  Network Pricing and Rate Allocation with Content Provider Participation , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[6]  Walter Willinger,et al.  To Peer or Not to Peer: Modeling the Evolution of the Internet's AS-Level Topology , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[7]  J. Walrand,et al.  Network Neutrality and Provider Investment Incentives , 2007, 2007 Conference Record of the Forty-First Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[8]  Tim Wu,et al.  Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination , 2003, J. Telecommun. High Technol. Law.

[9]  Vishal Misra,et al.  On Cooperative Settlement Between Content, Transit, and Eyeball Internet Service Providers , 2008, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[10]  Farnam Jahanian,et al.  Internet inter-domain traffic , 2010, SIGCOMM '10.

[11]  Amogh Dhamdhere,et al.  Can ISPs be profitable without violating “network neutrality”? , 2008, NetEcon '08.

[12]  Zhi-Li Zhang,et al.  Interactions, Competition and Innovation in a Service-Oriented Internet: An Economic Model , 2010, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[13]  M. Chiang,et al.  Network Rate Allocation with Content Provider Participation , 2008 .

[14]  Ben Y. Zhao,et al.  Understanding user behavior in large-scale video-on-demand systems , 2006, EuroSys.