The Attentional Suppressive Surround: Eccentricity, Location-Based and Feature-Based Effects and Interactions

The Selective Tuning model of visual attention (Tsotsos, 1990) has proposed that the focus of attention is surrounded by an inhibitory zone, eliciting a center-surround attentional distribution. This attentional suppressive surround inhibits irrelevant information which is located close to attended information in physical space (e.g., Cutzu and Tsotsos, 2003; Hopf et al., 2010) or in feature space (e.g., Tombu and Tsotsos, 2008; Störmer and Alvarez, 2014; Bartsch et al., 2017). In Experiment 1, we investigate the interaction between location-based and feature-based surround suppression and hypothesize that the attentional surround suppression would be maximized when spatially adjacent stimuli are also represented closely within a feature map. Our results demonstrate that perceptual discrimination is worst when two similar orientations are presented in proximity to each other, suggesting the interplay of the two surround suppression mechanisms. The Selective Tuning model also predicts that the size of the attentional suppressive surround is determined by the receptive field size of the neuron which optimally processes the attended information. The receptive field size of the processing neurons is tightly associated with stimulus size and eccentricity. Therefore, Experiment 2 tested the hypothesis that the size of the attentional suppressive surround would become larger as stimulus size and eccentricity increase, corresponding to an increase in the neuron's receptive field size. We show that stimulus eccentricity but not stimulus size modulates the size of the attentional suppressive surround. These results are consistent for both low- and high-level features (e.g., orientation and human faces). Overall, the present study supports the existence of the attentional suppressive surround and reveals new properties of this selection mechanism.

[1]  T. Womelsdorf,et al.  Dynamic shifts of visual receptive fields in cortical area MT by spatial attention , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Limits of focused attention in three-dimensional space , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Viola S. Störmer,et al.  Feature-Based Attention Elicits Surround Suppression in Feature Space , 2014, Current Biology.

[4]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  The center-surround profile of the focus of attention arises from recurrent processing in visual cortex. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Top-down flow of visual spatial attention signals from parietal to occipital cortex. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[6]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Attention Reshapes Center-Surround Receptive Field Structure in Macaque Cortical Area MT , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  R. Desimone,et al.  A backward progression of attentional effects in the ventral stream , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  The attentional field has a Mexican hat distribution , 2005, Vision Research.

[9]  Notger G. Müller,et al.  The attentional ‘spotlight's’ penumbra: center-surround modulation in striate cortex , 2004, Neuroreport.

[10]  B. Wandell,et al.  Compressive spatial summation in human visual cortex. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Evan S. Schaffer,et al.  Inhibitory Stabilization of the Cortical Network Underlies Visual Surround Suppression , 2009, Neuron.

[12]  Joris Vangeneugden,et al.  Orientation-Tuned Surround Suppression in Mouse Visual Cortex , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  B. Wandell,et al.  Mapping Hv4 and Ventral Occipital Cortex: the Venous Eclipse , 2022 .

[14]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Attending to orientation results in an inhibitory surround in orientation space , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Attention to Color Sharpens Neural Population Tuning via Feedback Processing in the Human Visual Cortex Hierarchy , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  John K. Tsotsos Analyzing vision at the complexity level , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[19]  John K. Tsotsos A Computational Perspective on Visual Attention , 2011 .

[20]  A. Meyer,et al.  Tracking the time course of multidimensional stimulus discrimination: Analyses of viewing patterns and processing times during “same”-“different“ decisions , 2002 .

[21]  Thomas Sanocki,et al.  Time course of perceptual grouping by color. , 2003, Psychological science.

[22]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  The spatial profile of the focus of attention in visual search: Insights from MEG recordings , 2010, Vision Research.

[23]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Spatial mapping of monkey VI cells with pure color and luminance stimuli , 1984, Vision Research.

[24]  Rufin van Rullen,et al.  A Feedback Model of Attention Explains the Diverse Effects of Attention on Neural Firing Rates and Receptive Field Structure , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[25]  H. Hawkins Parallel processing in complex visual discrimination , 1969 .

[26]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Estimating receptive field size from fMRI data in human striate and extrastriate visual cortex. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  M. Carrasco Visual attention: The past 25 years , 2011, Vision Research.

[28]  R. Desimone,et al.  Competitive Mechanisms Subserve Attention in Macaque Areas V2 and V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  S. Sherman,et al.  Receptive-field characteristics of neurons in cat striate cortex: Changes with visual field eccentricity. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  Computing is a natural science , 2007, CACM.

[31]  B. Farell,et al.  Same-different judgments: a review of current controversies in perceptual comparisons. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[33]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[34]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Expansion of MT Neurons Excitatory Receptive Fields during Covert Attentive Tracking , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Joel L. Davis,et al.  Visual attention and cortical circuits , 2001 .

[36]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  John K. Tsotsos A ‘complexity level’ analysis of immediate vision , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[38]  Fred H. Hamker,et al.  A mechanistic cortical microcircuit of attention for amplification, normalization and suppression , 2015, Vision Research.

[39]  Matthew R. Krause,et al.  Synaptic and Network Mechanisms of Sparse and Reliable Visual Cortical Activity during Nonclassical Receptive Field Stimulation , 2010, Neuron.

[40]  P. Lennie,et al.  Chromatic mechanisms in striate cortex of macaque , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[41]  Elaine J. Anderson,et al.  Perceptual load affects spatial tuning of neuronal populations in human early visual cortex , 2014, Current Biology.

[42]  P. Gouras,et al.  Responses of cells in foveal visual cortex of the monkey to pure color contrast. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  D. Hubel,et al.  Uniformity of monkey striate cortex: A parallel relationship between field size, scatter, and magnification factor , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[44]  S. Palmer,et al.  A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  Bruce D. Downing Response probabilities and “same-different” reaction times , 1971 .

[46]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Variations in size of the visual field in which targets are presented: An attentional range effect , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Surround Attenuation and Distractor Competition in Visual Search , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  O. Reiser,et al.  Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[49]  Don R. Lyon,et al.  A Framework for Understanding the Allocation of Attention in Location-Precued Discrimination , 1994 .

[50]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  Anitha Pasupathy,et al.  Equiluminance Cells in Visual Cortical Area V4 , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Attentional Modulation and Selection – An Integrated Approach , 2014, PloS one.

[53]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  The selective tuning model of attention: psychophysical evidence for a suppressive annulus around an attended item , 2003, Vision Research.

[54]  R. Shapley,et al.  The spatial transformation of color in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[55]  DH Hubel,et al.  Color and contrast sensitivity in the lateral geniculate body and primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[56]  F. Attneave,et al.  What Variables Produce Similarity Grouping , 1970 .

[57]  H. Egeth Parallel versus serial processes in multidimensional stimulus discrimination , 1966 .

[58]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[59]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[60]  Nao Ninomiya,et al.  The 10th anniversary of journal of visualization , 2007, J. Vis..

[61]  Anastasia Kiyonaga,et al.  Center-Surround Inhibition in Working Memory , 2016, Current Biology.

[62]  T. Womelsdorf,et al.  Receptive Field Shift and Shrinkage in Macaque Middle Temporal Area through Attentional Gain Modulation , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  H. Adesnik,et al.  A neural circuit for spatial summation in visual cortex , 2012, Nature.

[64]  D. LaBerge Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[65]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection theory: A user's guide, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[66]  Charles Curtis Eriksen,et al.  The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays , 1973 .

[67]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Towards the Quantitative Evaluation of Visual Attention Models Bottom−up Top-down Dynamic Static 0 0 0 , 2022 .

[68]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[69]  D. Bamber Reaction times and error rates for “same”-“different” judgments of multidimensional stimull , 1969 .

[70]  Michael J. Tarr,et al.  Recognizing disguised faces , 2012 .

[71]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  An Attentional Mechanism for Selecting Appropriate Actions Afforded by Graspable Objects , 2008, Psychological science.