Understanding transnational MBA students’ instructional communication preferences

This paper reports on a preliminary investigation into the instructional preferences of students from Confucian‐heritage backgrounds studying in a transnational Master of Business Administration (MBA) program of an Australian university. This is part of a long‐term undertaking to ensure that teaching and learning arrangements in the MBA program are improved. The teaching and learning environment of the program is characterised by an intensive teaching regime which utilises a mixed mode of face‐to‐face and online delivery which promotes independent and collaborative learning. The aim of the investigation was to provide lecturers with an understanding of the students’ instructional preferences so that, where possible and appropriate, they can better assist the students to meet the learning objectives of the MBA program. Questionnaire data was collected from students studying the MBA in English (EMBA) in both Hong Kong and Singapore, as well as students studying the MBA in Chinese (CMBA) in Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan. The findings demonstrate that whilst students ranked teacher‐directed, face‐to‐face instructional delivery highly, some students also indicated that an independent, online learning environment had advantages even though it was their least‐preferred approach to learning. These findings provide lecturers with insights into their students as learners and this is particularly useful in terms of informing planning processes for how to best assist students to work productively and successfully in the face‐to‐face and online teaching and learning environment.

[1]  Daniel Pratt,et al.  Chinese conceptions of 'effective teaching' in Hong Kong: towards culturally sensitive evaluation of teaching , 1999 .

[2]  Peter J. Smith Learners and their workplaces: towards a strategic model of flexible delivery of training in the workplace , 2001 .

[3]  Gail K. Sergenian,et al.  Transforming the Class into a Learning Organization , 2000 .

[4]  W. Neuman,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2002 .

[5]  Brigitte Denis,et al.  A Conceptual Framework to Design and Support Self-directed Learning in a Blended Learning Programme. A Case Study: the DES-TEF , 2003 .

[6]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[7]  R. Beard,et al.  Teaching and Learning in Higher Education , 1972 .

[8]  H. Russell Bernard,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2000 .

[9]  A. Bryman Social Research Methods , 2001 .

[10]  Eugene Sadler-Smith,et al.  Learning Preferences and Cognitive Style , 2000 .

[11]  Renata Tesch,et al.  Qualitative research : analysis types and software tools , 1990 .

[12]  J. Biggs,et al.  Teaching For Quality Learning At University , 1999 .

[13]  P. Ramsden Learning to Teach in Higher Education , 1991 .

[14]  Gilly Salmon,et al.  E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online , 2003 .

[15]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[16]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students (5th edn) , 2007 .

[17]  Sandra Ratcliff Daffron,et al.  Planning Programs for Adult Learners: A Practical Guide , 1994 .

[18]  Peter J. Smith,et al.  Strategies for accommodating individuals' styles and preferences in flexible learning programmes , 2004, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[19]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students , 2006 .

[20]  E. Sadler‐Smith,et al.  Cognitive style and instructional preferences , 1999 .