Optimal Placement and Selection of Camera Network Nodes for Target Localization

The paper studies the optimal placement of multiple cameras and the selection of the best subset of cameras for single target localization in the framework of sensor networks. The cameras are assumed to be aimed horizontally around a room. To conserve both computation and communication energy, each camera reduces its image to a binary “scan-line” by performing simple background subtraction followed by vertical summing and thresholding, and communicates only the center of the detected foreground object. Assuming noisy camera measurements and an object prior, the minimum mean squared error of the best linear estimate of the object location in 2-D is used as a metric for placement and selection. The placement problem is shown to be equivalent to a classical inverse kinematics robotics problem, which can be solved efficiently using gradient descent techniques. The selection problem on the other hand is a combinatorial optimization problem and finding the optimal solution can be too costly to implement in an energy-constrained wireless camera network. A semi-definite programming approximation for the problem is shown to achieve close to optimal solutions with much lower computational burden. Simulation and experimental results are presented.

[1]  Chris Welman,et al.  INVERSE KINEMATICS AND GEOMETRIC CONSTRAINTS FOR ARTICULATED FIGURE MANIPULATION , 1993 .

[2]  R. Nemoto,et al.  A wireless biosensing chip for DNA detection , 2005, ISSCC. 2005 IEEE International Digest of Technical Papers. Solid-State Circuits Conference, 2005..

[3]  Feng Zhao,et al.  Scalable Information-Driven Sensor Querying and Routing for Ad Hoc Heterogeneous Sensor Networks , 2002, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl..

[4]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Analysis of uncertainty bounds due to quantization for three-dimensional position estimation using multiple cameras , 1998 .

[5]  Christophe Dumont,et al.  Next best view system in a 3D object modeling task , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation. CIRA'99 (Cat. No.99EX375).

[6]  Gregory J. Pottie,et al.  Wireless integrated network sensors , 2000, Commun. ACM.

[7]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Wireless sensor networks: a survey , 2002, Comput. Networks.

[8]  John W. Fisher,et al.  Maximum Mutual Information Principle for Dynamic Sensor Query Problems , 2003, IPSN.

[9]  Gregory J. Pottie,et al.  Entropy-based sensor selection heuristic for local-ization , 2004 .

[10]  Gregory J. Pottie,et al.  Poster abstract: entropy-based sensor selection for localization , 2003, SenSys '03.

[11]  James Davis,et al.  Camera Placement Considering Occlusion for Robust Motion Capture , 2000 .

[12]  A. David Marshall,et al.  Viewpoint Selection for Complete Surface Coverage of Three Dimensional Objects , 1998, BMVC.

[13]  Beno Benhabib,et al.  A complete generalized solution to the inverse kinematics of robots , 1985, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[14]  Roger Mohr,et al.  Optimal camera placement for accurate reconstruction , 2002, Pattern Recognit..

[15]  John Anderson,et al.  Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring , 2002, WSNA '02.

[16]  G. Pottie,et al.  Entropy-based sensor selection heuristic for target localization , 2004, Third International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2004. IPSN 2004.

[17]  Mateu Sbert,et al.  Viewpoint Selection using Viewpoint Entropy , 2001, VMV.

[18]  Hong Zhang Two-dimensional optimal sensor placement , 1995, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[19]  Franz Rendl,et al.  A recipe for semidefinite relaxation for (0,1)-quadratic programming , 1995, J. Glob. Optim..

[20]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Sensor Tasking for Occupancy Reasoning in a Network of Cameras , 2004 .