Preferences for in‐person disclosure: Patients declining telephone disclosure characteristics and outcomes in the multicenter Communication Of GENetic Test Results by Telephone study

Telephone disclosure of cancer genetic test results is noninferior to in‐person disclosure. However, how patients who prefer in‐person communication of results differ from those who agree to telephone disclosure is unclear but important when considering delivery models for genetic medicine. Patients undergoing cancer genetic testing were recruited to a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial (NCT01736345) comparing telephone to in‐person disclosure of genetic test results. We evaluated preferences for in‐person disclosure, factors associated with this preference and outcomes compared to those who agreed to randomization. Among 1178 enrolled patients, 208 (18%) declined randomization, largely given a preference for in‐person disclosure. These patients were more likely to be older (P = 0.007) and to have had multigene panel testing (P < 0.001). General anxiety (P = 0.007), state anxiety (P = 0.008), depression (P = 0.011), cancer‐specific distress (P = 0.021) and uncertainty (P = 0.03) were higher after pretest counseling. After disclosure of results, they also had higher general anxiety (P = 0.003), depression (P = 0.002) and cancer‐specific distress (P = 0.043). While telephone disclosure is a reasonable alternative to in‐person disclosure in most patients, some patients have a strong preference for in‐person communication. Patient age, distress and complexity of testing are important factors to consider and requests for in‐person disclosure should be honored when possible.

[1]  O. Olopade,et al.  Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone vs In-Person Disclosure of Germline Cancer Genetic Test Results , 2018, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  S. Buys,et al.  Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone Delivery of BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling Compared With In-Person Counseling: 1-Year Follow-Up. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  L. Fleisher,et al.  Utilizing Remote Real-Time Videoconferencing to Expand Access to Cancer Genetic Services in Community Practices: A Multicenter Feasibility Study , 2016, Journal of medical Internet research.

[4]  A. Trepanier,et al.  A Comparison of Telephone Genetic Counseling and In-Person Genetic Counseling from the Genetic Counselor’s Perspective , 2016, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[5]  A. Tong,et al.  KHA-CARI Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Guideline: Genetic Testing for Diagnosis. , 2015, Seminars in nephrology.

[6]  S. Buys,et al.  Expanding access to BRCA1/2 genetic counseling with telephone delivery: a cluster randomized trial. , 2014, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  B. Egleston,et al.  Development of a Communication Protocol for Telephone Disclosure of Genetic Test Results for Cancer Predisposition , 2014, JMIR research protocols.

[8]  W. Chung,et al.  Development of a tiered and binned genetic counseling model for informed consent in the era of multiplex testing for cancer susceptibility , 2014, Genetics in Medicine.

[9]  M. Robson Multigene panel testing: planning the next generation of research studies in clinical cancer genetics. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  A. Trepanier,et al.  Models of Service Delivery for Cancer Genetic Risk Assessment and Counseling , 2014, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[11]  J. Garber,et al.  Randomized noninferiority trial of telephone versus in-person genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  B. Egleston,et al.  Implementation and outcomes of telephone disclosure of clinical BRCA1/2 test results. , 2013, Patient education and counseling.

[13]  Stephanie A Cohen,et al.  Identification of Genetic Counseling Service Delivery Models in Practice: A Report from the NSGC Service Delivery Model Task Force , 2013, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[14]  Haley R. Eidem,et al.  Effects of informed consent for individual genome sequencing on relevant knowledge , 2012, Clinical genetics.

[15]  A. StAteMent Points to consider in the clinical application of genomic sequencing , 2012, Genetics in Medicine.

[16]  M. Link,et al.  2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2011, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  Richard Mayeux,et al.  Genetic counseling and testing for Alzheimer disease: Joint practice guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors , 2011, Genetics in Medicine.

[18]  M. Robson,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy Statement Update: Genetic and Genomic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility. , 2010, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  J. Evans,et al.  Telephoned BRCA1/2 Genetic Test Results: Prevalence, Practice, and Patient Satisfaction , 2009, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[20]  Paul G Shekelle,et al.  Delivery of genomic medicine for common chronic adult diseases: a systematic review. , 2008, JAMA.

[21]  S. Steinberg,et al.  Randomized comparison of phone versus in-person BRCA1/2 predisposition genetic test result disclosure counseling , 2007, Genetics in Medicine.

[22]  J. Berliner,et al.  Risk Assessment and Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors , 2007, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[23]  J. Bensing,et al.  Cancer Genetic Counseling: Communication and Counselees’ Post-Visit Satisfaction, Cognitions, Anxiety, and Needs Fulfillment , 2007, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[24]  D. Toppmeyer,et al.  Cancer genetics knowledge and beliefs and receipt of results in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals receiving counseling for BRCA1/2 mutations. , 2004, Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center.

[25]  R. Snaith,et al.  The Hospital Anxiety And Depression Scale , 2003, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[26]  D. Cella,et al.  A brief assessment of concerns associated with genetic testing for cancer: the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire. , 2002, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[27]  B. Biesecker,et al.  Process studies in genetic counseling: peering into the black box. , 2001, American journal of medical genetics.

[28]  F. Collins,et al.  Genetic counseling for families with inherited susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer. , 1993, JAMA.

[29]  M. Horowitz,et al.  Impact of Event Scale: A Measure of Subjective Stress , 1979, Psychosomatic medicine.

[30]  John Van Hoewyk,et al.  A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models , 2001 .

[31]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[32]  C. Spielberger,et al.  Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory , 1970 .