A study of time limit structures on participation flow in an asynchronous discussion forum

The need for increased instructor involvement and teaching presence in an asynchronous discussion forum has received prominence in the literature. Less known is the influence of the instructor in structuring online forums to facilitate meaningful student participation and interaction. This study explored how the use of time structures established by the instructor moderates the flow of topic discussions in a forum. The study utilized five metrics - density, intensity, latency, responses, and a composite ‘wellness index’ - to compare the patterns of discussion forum activity derived from graduate-level courses offered with two different instructor management approaches. In one set of five courses, the instructor utilized a time-structured style, in which discussion topics were identified at the beginning of the term and students had 21 days to contribute to each topic. In the second set of five courses, the instructor presented the topics gradually during varied time periods of the course of the term and imposed no specific deadlines for students to contribute. Although preliminary, the findings of the study indicate that the instructor's management style of introducing topics in an online course influences the flow of the discussion.

[1]  D. Garrison,et al.  Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[2]  Vance A. Durrington,et al.  It's the Same Only Different: The Effect the Discussion Moderator Has on Student Participation in Online Class Discussions. , 2004 .

[3]  Allan Jeong The Sequential Analysis of Group Interaction and Critical Thinking in Online , 2003 .

[4]  Allan Jeong,et al.  How day of posting affects level of critical discourse in asynchronous discussions and computer-supported collaborative argumentation , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[5]  P. Shea,et al.  A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses , 2006, Internet High. Educ..

[6]  Timothy J. Ellis,et al.  Comparison of Social Presence in Voice-based and Text-based Asynchronous Computer Conferences , 2009 .

[7]  Robin H. Kay,et al.  Developing a comprehensive metric for assessing discussion board effectiveness , 2006, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[8]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[9]  Allan Jeong A Guide to Analyzing Message–Response Sequences and Group Interaction Patterns in Computer‐mediated Communication , 2005 .

[10]  Alfred P. Rovai,et al.  Facilitating online discussions effectively , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[11]  Matthew Shaul Assessing Online Discussion Forum Participation , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ..

[12]  A. Hwang,et al.  Does "teaching presence" exist in online MBA courses? , 2006, Internet High. Educ..

[13]  Timothy J. Ellis,et al.  Comparison of Social Presence in Voice-Based and Text-Based Asynchronous Computer Conferences , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[14]  Scott P. Schaffer,et al.  Integrating Knowledge, Performance, and Learning Objects , 2004 .

[15]  William J. Gibbs,et al.  An Analysis of Temporal Norms in Online Discussions , 2008 .

[16]  Laurie P. Dringus,et al.  Using data mining as a strategy for assessing asynchronous discussion forums , 2005, Comput. Educ..