Effect of scanning and image reconstruction settings in X-ray computed microtomography on quality and segmentation of 3D soil images

Over the last decade, X-ray computed tomography (CT) has been used increasingly to characterise the microscale architecture of soils. As a result significant progress has been made in the acquisition and interpretation of X-ray CT data, as well as in the thresholding of 3D greyscale CT images in order to produce binary (black and white) ones. Nevertheless, sizeable uncertainties persist, in particular concerning optimal instrumental settings used to generate the greyscale images. In this context, the key aim of this study is to investigate in detail the effect of scanning resolution and reconstruction settings such as noise reduction and 32-bit to 8-bit mapping interval on the 3D X-ray CT imaging of soil structure and the impact on the performance of thresholding methods. To assess the quality of the X-ray CT greyscale images, measures of contrast, noise and sharpness are proposed and tested on a series of images of five different soil samples. At the same time, performance of four segmentation algorithms, i.e., three methods recently developed to deal specifically with soil samples and Otsu's method as a benchmark, was evaluated using functional measures of 3D binary images, including Minkowski functionals and surface pore connected fraction. Results of these analyses suggest that the acquisition and reconstruction parameters investigated significantly affect the quality of soil images, and the subsequent thresholding process. In particular, it was found that thresholding by any of the four methods is greatly affected by the quality of image sharpness, which for soil images appears to be mainly controlled by the scanning resolution. As a result, it is concluded that no matter what reconstruction resolution is required in a study, in order to allow an accurate identification of the pore space, the sample should always be scanned at the highest resolution permitted by the scanning instrument and the sample size. Results also suggest that the three segmentation methods recently developed for soil images thresholding are robust to different levels of noise as well as the choice of the 32-bit mapping interval, as long as lower and upper interval limits for mapping are chosen within suitable boundaries.

[1]  E. Peli Contrast in complex images. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[2]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[3]  Anders Kaestner,et al.  Imaging and image processing in porous media research , 2008 .

[4]  S. Peth,et al.  Exploration of soil micromorphology to identify coarse-sized OM assemblages in X-ray CT images of undisturbed cultivated soil cores , 2012 .

[5]  Wei Wang,et al.  Observer-dependent variability of the thresholding step in the quantitative analysis of soil images and X-ray microtomography data , 2010 .

[6]  W. Otten,et al.  Fungal colonization in soils with different management histories: modeling growth in three-dimensional pore volumes. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[7]  Hans-Jörg Vogel,et al.  Quantification of soil structure based on Minkowski functions , 2010, Comput. Geosci..

[8]  Alasdair N. Houston,et al.  New Local Thresholding Method for Soil Images by Minimizing Grayscale Intra‐Class Variance , 2013 .

[9]  W. Otten,et al.  Modelling and quantifying the effect of heterogeneity in soil physical conditions on fungal growth , 2010 .

[10]  Paul D. Hallett,et al.  Distribution of soil carbon and microbial biomass in arable soils under different tillage regimes , 2010, Plant and Soil.

[11]  Markus Tuller,et al.  Evaluation of an Advanced Benchtop Micro-Computed Tomography System for Quantifying Porosities and Pore-Size Distributions of Two Brazilian Oxisols , 2011 .

[12]  W. Brent Lindquist,et al.  Image Thresholding by Indicator Kriging , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  Hans-Jörg Vogel,et al.  Segmentation of X-ray microtomography images of soil using gradient masks , 2010, Comput. Geosci..

[14]  W. Otten,et al.  From Dust Bowl to Dust Bowl: Soils are Still Very Much a Frontier of Science , 2011 .

[15]  C A Gilligan,et al.  Prominent effect of soil network heterogeneity on microbial invasion. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[16]  Alasdair N. Houston,et al.  Adaptive-window indicator kriging: A thresholding method for computed tomography images of porous media , 2013, Comput. Geosci..

[17]  Robert M. Ochshorn,et al.  Sharpness functions for computational aesthetics and image sublimation , 2011 .

[18]  Mark L. Rivers,et al.  Comparison of image segmentation methods in simulated 2D and 3D microtomographic images of soil aggregates , 2011 .

[19]  D. Strawn,et al.  Molecular characterization of copper in soils using X-ray absorption spectroscopy. , 2009, Environmental pollution.

[20]  R. Heck,et al.  Application of X-ray computed tomography to soil science: A literature review , 2008 .

[21]  Hans-Jörg Vogel,et al.  Topological characterization of pore space in soil — sample preparation and digital image-processing , 1996 .

[22]  Wolfgang Fink,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Multiphase Segmentation of X‐Ray CT Data of Porous Materials Using a Bayesian Markov Random Field Framework , 2012 .

[23]  P. Baveye,et al.  Electron microprobe and synchrotron x-ray fluorescence mapping of the heterogeneous distribution of copper in high-copper vineyard soils. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  R. Reese Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists , 2001 .

[25]  Alasdair N. Houston,et al.  Emergent Behavior of Soil Fungal Dynamics: Influence of Soil Architecture and Water Distribution , 2012 .

[26]  Philippe C. Baveye,et al.  Automated statistical method to align 2D chemical maps with 3D X-ray computed micro-tomographic images of soils , 2011 .

[27]  R. Ketcham,et al.  Acquisition, optimization and interpretation of X-ray computed tomographic imagery: applications to the geosciences , 2001 .

[28]  L. Birnbaum,et al.  Elevated PBDE levels in pet cats: sentinels for humans? , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Exploring the geostatistical method for estimating the signal-to-noise ratio of images , 2007 .

[30]  Frank Mücklich,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Microstructures in Materials Science , 2000 .

[31]  Andrew P. Whitmore,et al.  Combining Spatial Resolutions in the Multiscale Analysis of Soil Pore‐Size Distributions , 2009 .

[32]  M. Tuller,et al.  Segmentation of X‐ray computed tomography images of porous materials: A crucial step for characterization and quantitative analysis of pore structures , 2009 .

[33]  Bülent Sankur,et al.  Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation , 2004, J. Electronic Imaging.