Defining and developing measures of lean production

Abstract Our research addresses the confusion and inconsistency associated with “lean production.” We attempt to clarify the semantic confusion surrounding lean production by conducting an extensive literature review using a historical evolutionary perspective in tracing its main components. We identify a key set of measurement items by charting the linkages between measurement instruments that have been used to measure its various components from the past literature, and using a rigorous, two-stage empirical method and data from a large set of manufacturing firms, we narrow the list of items selected to represent lean production to 48 items, empirically identifying 10 underlying components. In doing so, we map the operational space corresponding to conceptual space surrounding lean production. Configuration theory provides the theoretical underpinnings and helps to explain the synergistic relationships among its underlying components.

[1]  Harold Koontz,et al.  Management: a book of readings , 1980 .

[2]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  A FRAMEWORK AND MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENT FOR JUST‐IN‐TIME MANUFACTURING , 1993 .

[3]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  The Impact of Quality Management Practices on Performance and Competitive Advantage , 1995 .

[4]  A. Tsui,et al.  Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[5]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  The impact of just-in-time manufacturing and its infrastructure on manufacturing performance , 1997 .

[6]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Toyota Production System , 1993 .

[7]  Y. Sugimori,et al.  Toyota production system and Kanban system Materialization of just-in-time and respect-for-human system , 1977 .

[8]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  The Toyota way : 14 management principles from the world's greatest manufacturer , 2004 .

[9]  Elliott N. Weiss,et al.  TPM: PLANNED AND AUTONOMOUS MAINTENANCE: BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN PRACTICE AND RESEARCH , 1998 .

[10]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[11]  Bhanu S. Ragu-Nathan,et al.  Development and validation of a measurement instrument for studying supply chain management practices , 2005 .

[12]  Rohit Verma,et al.  MULTIPLE RATERS IN SURVEY‐BASED OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: A REVIEW AND TUTORIAL , 2000 .

[13]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  X. Koufteros Testing a model of pull production: a paradigm for manufacturing research using structural equation modeling , 1999 .

[15]  Soo Wook Kim,et al.  Disentangling leanness and agility: An empirical investigation , 2006 .

[16]  J. Dean,et al.  MANAGEMENT THEORY AND TOTAL QUALITY: IMPROVING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE THROUGH THEORY DEVELOPMENT , 1994 .

[17]  Peter T. Ward,et al.  Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance , 2003 .

[18]  John Paul Macduffie,et al.  The Adoption of High‐Involvement Work Practices , 1996 .

[19]  Y. Monden Toyota Production System: Practical Approach to Production Management , 1983 .

[20]  Eitan Zemel,et al.  Managing Business Process Flows , 1999 .

[21]  大野 耐一,et al.  Toyota production system : beyond large-scale production , 1988 .

[22]  C. A. B. O. Yg. Concept Fallibility in Organizational Science , 1989 .

[23]  D. Samson,et al.  EXPLODING THE MYTH: DO ALL QUALITY MANAGEMENT PRACTICES CONTRIBUTE TO SUPERIOR QUALITY PERFORMANCE? , 1999 .

[24]  Joel E. Ross,et al.  Total Quality Management: Text, Cases and Readings , 1992 .

[25]  Ron McLachlin,et al.  Management initiatives and just-in-time manufacturing , 1997 .

[26]  R. Schroeder,et al.  Relationships between implementation of TQM, JIT, and TPM and manufacturing performance , 2001 .

[27]  J. S. Long,et al.  Covariance Structure Models: An Introduction to LISREL , 1983 .

[28]  James P. Womack,et al.  Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation , 1996 .

[29]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  Relationship Between JIT and TQM: Practices and Performance , 1995 .

[30]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. , 1999 .

[31]  J. Antonakis,et al.  Could lean production job design be intrinsically motivating? Contextual, configurational, and levels-of-analysis issues , 2006 .

[32]  James Rinehart,et al.  Just Another Car Factory , 1997 .

[33]  鄭宇庭 行銷硏究 : Marketing research , 2009 .

[34]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[35]  William J. Doll,et al.  Developing measures of time-based manufacturing , 1998 .

[36]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[37]  John Paul Macduffie Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry , 1995 .

[38]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  A disagreement about within-group agreement: Disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus. , 1992 .

[39]  P. Chisnall Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[40]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  門田 安弘,et al.  Toyota production system : practical approach to production management , 1983 .

[42]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Revisiting the use and effectiveness of modern management practices , 2004 .

[43]  Ben Dankbaar,et al.  Lean Production: Denial, Confirmation or Extension of Sociotechnical Systems Design? , 1997 .

[44]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  Empirical research methods in operations management , 1990 .

[45]  David B. Greenberger,et al.  Predictors and outcomes of reactions to pay-for-performance plans. , 1991 .

[46]  Robert W. Hall,et al.  Attaining manufacturing excellence : just-in-time, total quality, total people involvement , 1986 .

[47]  Ellen Mickiewicz Evaluation Studies of Soviet Party Members , 1976 .

[48]  Chimezie A. B. Osigweh Concept Fallibility in Organizational Science , 1989 .

[49]  D. Whetten What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution , 1989 .

[50]  J A Davy,et al.  A derivation of the underlying constructs of just-in-time management systems. , 1992, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[51]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[52]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR QUALITY MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND AN ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENT , 1994 .

[53]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. , 1996 .

[54]  Mark A. Vonderembse,et al.  The impact of organizational structure on time-based manufacturing and plant performance , 2003 .

[55]  N. Venkatraman The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Towards Verbal and Statistical Congruence. , 1987 .

[56]  Bernard Mayo,et al.  MEANING AND THE MORAL SCIENCES , 1979 .

[57]  R. H. Finn A Note on Estimating the Reliability of Categorical Data , 1970 .

[58]  J. Wacker A theory of formal conceptual definitions: developing theory-building measurement instruments , 2004 .

[59]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Archetypes of Strategy Formulation , 1978 .

[60]  S. Spear,et al.  Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[61]  F. Filion ESTIMATING BIAS DUE TO NONRESPONSE IN MAIL SURVEYS , 1975 .

[62]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  THE ROLE OF INFRASTRUCTURE PRACTICES IN THE EFFECTIVENESS OF JIT PRACTICES: IMPLICATIONS FOR PLANT COMPETITIVENESS , 2003 .

[63]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  To Pull or Not to Pull: What Is the Question? , 2004, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[64]  William H. Glick,et al.  Typologies As a Unique Form Of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling , 1994 .

[65]  Xenophon Koufteros,et al.  The impact of organizational structure on the level of JIT attainment: Towards theory development , 1998 .

[66]  S. Sitkin,et al.  DISTINGUISHING CONTROL FROM LEARNING IN TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT: A CONTINGENCY PERSPECTIVE , 1994 .

[67]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  Theory Building through Conceptual Methods , 1993 .

[68]  Rachna Shah,et al.  Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward ☆ , 2006 .

[69]  B. Hawkins,et al.  A framework: , 2020, Harmful Interaction between the Living and the Dead in Greek Tragedy.

[70]  J. E. Butler,et al.  Tautology in the resource-based view and the implications of externally determined resource value: f , 2001 .

[71]  Computer Staff,et al.  The Machine That Changed the World , 1992 .

[72]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Measurement issues in empirical research: improving measures of operations strategy and advanced manufacturing technology , 2000 .

[73]  D. Dillman Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .