Separation of diffusion and slow flow effects by use of flow rephasing and dephasing

Spin‐echo signal intensity alterations due to diffusion and slow flow are investigated in connection with modified Stejskal‐Tanner pulse sequences for 2D Fourier MR imaging, one for flow rephasing and the other for flow dephasing gradient waveforms. The theoretical considerations and experimental results concerning the diffusion coefficient measurements of slowly flowing material by these sequences are summarized as follows: (a) By using the flow dephasing sequence with different diffusion and flow‐sensitive gradients, slow flow effects can be distinguished from diffusion effects based on the quantitative difference between the diffusion‐and flow‐sensitive gradient amplitude dependences of these processes. (b) By using the combination of the flow rephasing and dephasing sequences with the same diffusion sensitivity, slow flow effects can be distinguished from diffusion effects directly based on their qualitative difference. By use of the latter approach, several in vivo images are also presented, which mainly represent macroscopic motions of spins, including slow flow such as tissue perfusion. © 1992 Academic Press, Inc.

[1]  K. J. Packer The study of slow coherent molecular motion by pulsed nuclear magnetic resonance , 1969 .

[2]  Irving J. Lowe,et al.  A modified pulsed gradient technique for measuring diffusion in the presence of large background gradients , 1980 .

[3]  MRI signal loss due to microcirculation: Phantom studies , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion , 1990 .

[5]  P. Grenier,et al.  MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. , 1986, Radiology.

[6]  J. Duerk,et al.  Motion artifact suppression technique (MAST) for MR imaging. , 1987, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  H. Goldsmith,et al.  Rheological Aspects of Thrombosis and Haemostasis: Basic Principles and Applications , 1986, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[8]  E. Stejskal Use of Spin Echoes in a Pulsed Magnetic‐Field Gradient to Study Anisotropic, Restricted Diffusion and Flow , 1965 .

[9]  G. Pawlik,et al.  Quantitative capillary topography and blood flow in the cerebral cortex of cats: an in vivo microscopic study , 1981, Brain Research.

[10]  Albert Macovski,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Angiography , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Use of ultralong echo time imaging to assist in measuring the velocity of perfused flow in vivo , 1989, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  J. E. Tanner,et al.  Spin diffusion measurements : spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient , 1965 .

[13]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[14]  M C Bushell,et al.  PRELIMINARY COMMUNICATION: The spatial mapping of translational diffusion coefficients by the NMR imaging technique , 1985 .

[15]  T. Kozuka,et al.  Effects of velocity profile of to‐and‐fro pulsatile flow on magnetic resonance signal intensity , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Z H Cho,et al.  The effects of random directional distributed flow in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. , 1987, Medical physics.

[17]  Akira Hirai,et al.  A Pulsed NMR Study on the Flow of Fluid , 1979 .