Design and Development of a Speech Intelligibility Test Based on Pseudowords in French: Why and How?

Purpose The current intelligibility tests performed on speakers with atypical speech production are limited by the ability of listeners to restore distorted sequences. This results in a measure that is overvalued when compared with the real articulatory performance. In this article, we present a new intelligibility test in order to neutralize the commonly encountered bias in traditional perception-based assessments. We present the construction of the acoustic-phonetic decoding task and its first test during a perceptual judgment test of intelligibility and during a result comparison with a global perceptual evaluation. Method We developed a very large pseudoword directory including about 90,000 forms that respect French phonotactic constraints. From this directory, we have created lists of pseudowords intended to be recorded for the constitution of the corpus. These lists are established due to an algorithm integrating predefined linguistic constraints and produced by 47 speakers (nine healthy and 38 patients). We then performed a perceptual judgment of intelligibility test with 20 listeners who transcribed these productions. Results At the end of the data processing stage, we obtained a Perceived Phonological Deviation (PPD) score for each speaker that reflects the average number of features altered per phoneme. We then compared the PPD score with a global intelligibility score derived from a global perceptual assessment of intelligibility and of the alteration severity. Conclusions The current findings confirm that a speech intelligibility test based on pseudowords in French achieves fine-grained PPD scores, which enables discrimination between patients and healthy speakers. Moreover, the PPD score is related to the global intelligibility score, especially in severity. Further studies are needed to better understand the discrimination power of this intelligibility test based on an acoustic-phonetic decoding task.

[1]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  Intelligibility in speech disorders : theory, measurement, and management , 1992 .

[2]  A. Ghio,et al.  De l'intelligibilité à la compréhensibilité de la parole, quelles mesures en pratique clinique ? , 2013 .

[3]  Assessment of impairment of intelligibility and of speech signal after oral cavity and oropharynx cancer. , 2019, European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases.

[4]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  The Intelligibility of Children's SpeechA Review of Evaluation Procedures , 1994 .

[5]  B. Lindblom On the communication process: Speaker-listener interaction and the development of speech* , 1990 .

[6]  Martine Grice,et al.  The SUS test: A method for the assessment of text-to-speech synthesis intelligibility using Semantically Unpredictable Sentences , 1996, Speech Commun..

[7]  W. Ganong Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  R. M. Warren,et al.  Auditory illusions and confusions. , 1970, Scientific American.

[9]  Boris New,et al.  Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE , 2001 .

[10]  Michael J. Fischer,et al.  The String-to-String Correction Problem , 1974, JACM.

[11]  Kate Bunton,et al.  Influence of visual information on the intelligibility of dysarthric speech. , 2007, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[12]  J. Connolly,et al.  Quantifying target—realization differences. Part I: Segments , 1997 .

[13]  V. Woisard,et al.  Relationship Between Speech Intelligibility and Speech Comprehension in Babble Noise. , 2015, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[14]  Monica McHenry,et al.  An exploration of listener variability in intelligibility judgments. , 2011, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[15]  D. Norris,et al.  Perceptual learning in speech , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Grzegorz Kondrak,et al.  Phonetic Alignment and Similarity , 2003, Comput. Humanit..

[17]  P. Layde,et al.  Speech Intelligibility and Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors , 2004, The Laryngoscope.

[18]  Antoine Giovanni,et al.  Top-down mechanisms in dysphonia perception: the need for blind tests. , 2013, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[19]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  Toward phonetic intelligibility testing in dysarthria. , 1989, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[20]  F. Béchet LIA―PHON: Un système complet de phonétisation de textes , 2001 .