Self-Image and Moral Balancing - An Experimental Analysis

In our experiment, a dictator game variant, the reported outcome of a die roll determines the endowment (low/high) in a subsequent dictator game. In one treatment the experimenter is present and no cheating is possible, while in another subjects can enter the result of the roll themselves. Moral self-image is also manipulated in the experiment preceding ours. The aim of this experimental set up is to analyze dynamic aspects of moral behavior. When cheating is possible, substantially more high endowments are claimed and transfers of high-endowed dictators are bigger than when cheating is not possible (mediated by the preceding moral self-image manipulation). The preceding manipulations also have a direct effect on generosity, when subjects have to report the roll of the die truthfully. Moral balancing appears to be an important factor in individual decision making.

[1]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. , 1999 .

[2]  Marco Piovesan,et al.  Luck or Cheating? A Field Experiment on Honesty with Children , 2008 .

[3]  Joachim Winter,et al.  Fairness and cheating , 2012 .

[4]  E. Aronson.  The Return of the Repressed: Dissonance Theory Makes a Comeback , 1992 .

[5]  G. Horenczyk,et al.  Moral balance: the effect of prior behaviour on decision in moral conflict. , 1990, The British journal of social psychology.

[6]  Robyn M. Dawes,et al.  What you don't know won't hurt me: Costly (but quiet) exit in dictator games , 2006 .

[7]  George A. Akerlof,et al.  Identity and the Economics of Organizations , 2005 .

[8]  Alexander W. Cappelen,et al.  When Do We Lie? , 2012 .

[9]  J. Tirole,et al.  Identity, morals, and taboos: beliefs as assets. , 2011, The quarterly journal of economics.

[10]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  Lies in Disguise. An experimental study on cheating , 2013 .

[11]  R. Bodner.  THE DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF ACTIONS IN A SELF-SIGNALING MODEL , 2000 .

[12]  Colin Camerer.  Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[13]  U. Fischbacher.  z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[14]  Nina Mazar,et al.  The Dishonesty of Honest People: A Theory of Self-Concept Maintenance , 2008 .

[15]  T. Regner,et al.  Honestly, why are you donating money to charity? An experimental study about self-awareness in status-seeking behavior , 2015 .

[16]  Chen-Bo Zhong,et al.  Do Green Products Make Us Better People? , 2009, Psychological science.

[17]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  Pay-what-you-want, identity, and self-signaling in markets , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Marc Le Menestrel,et al.  Rules or consequences? The role of ethical mindsets in moral dynamics , 2012 .

[19]  Ben Greiner,et al.  An Online Recruitment System for Economic Experiments , 2004 .

[20]  C. M. Capra,et al.  Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment , 2009, Judgment and Decision Making.

[21]  Alex Imas,et al.  Paying to Be Nice: Consistency and Costly Prosocial Behavior , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[22]  H. Sackeim,et al.  Self-deception: A concept in search of a phenomenon. , 1979 .

[23]  James Konow,et al.  Fair Shares: Accountability and Cognitive Dissonance in Allocation Decisions , 2000 .

[24]  Michel J. J. Handgraaf,et al.  Ethical Manoeuvring: Why People Avoid Both Major and Minor Lies , 2010 .

[25]  Roberto A. Weber,et al.  Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness , 2007 .

[26]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[27]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  Rumen Iliev,et al.  Sinning Saints and Saintly Sinners , 2009, Psychological science.

[29]  Zachary Grossman,et al.  Strategic Ignorance and the Robustness of Social Preferences , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[30]  Michel J. J. Handgraaf,et al.  Justified ethicality: Observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior , 2011 .

[31]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Self-Serving Altruism? The Lure of Unethical Actions that Benefit Others. , 2013, Journal of economic behavior & organization.

[32]  W. Güth,et al.  Motives of Sanctioning: Equity and Emotions in a Public Good Experiment with Punishment , 2012 .

[33]  Roberto A. Weber,et al.  Sorting in Experiments with Application to Social Preferences , 2019 .

[34]  George A. Akerlof,et al.  Economics and Identity , 2000 .

[35]  Tobias Regner,et al.  Do I Really Want to Know? A Cognitive Dissonance-Based Explanation of Other-Regarding Behavior , 2011, Games.