Humeral bone resorption after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty using an uncemented stem.

[1]  Ryan Willing,et al.  Comparison of proximal humeral bone stresses between stemless, short stem, and standard stem length: a finite element analysis. , 2016, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[2]  D. Parks,et al.  Radiographic evaluation of short-stem press-fit total shoulder arthroplasty: short-term follow-up. , 2016, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[3]  P. Raiss,et al.  Radiologic bone adaptations on a cementless short-stem shoulder prosthesis. , 2016, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[4]  J. Sperling,et al.  Total shoulder arthroplasty: are the humeral components getting shorter? , 2016, Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine.

[5]  C. Roche,et al.  Stemless and Short Stem Humeral Components in Shoulder Arthroplasty. , 2015, Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease.

[6]  M. Loew,et al.  Clinical and radiological results of a cementless short stem shoulder prosthesis at minimum follow-up of two years , 2015, International Orthopaedics.

[7]  R. Churchill,et al.  Stemless shoulder arthroplasty: current status. , 2014, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[8]  S. Chung,et al.  The measurement of bone mineral density of bilateral proximal humeri using DXA in patients with unilateral rotator cuff tear , 2014, Osteoporosis International.

[9]  L. Audigé,et al.  Patterns of proximal humeral bone resorption after total shoulder arthroplasty with an uncemented rectangular stem. , 2014, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[10]  J. Oh,et al.  Measurement of volumetric bone mineral density in proximal humerus using quantitative computed tomography in patients with unilateral rotator cuff tear. , 2014, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[11]  T. B. Edwards,et al.  Radiographic changes around humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty. , 2014, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  P. Banaszkiewicz.  Porous-Coated Hip Replacement. The Factors Governing Bone Ingrowth, Stress Shielding, and Clinical Results , 2014 .

[13]  M. Griffith,et al.  Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Utilizing Mini-Stem Humeral Components: Technique and Short-Term Results , 2011, HSS Journal ®.

[14]  L. Grochola,et al.  Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodelling after implantation of anatomic and straight stem prostheses in total hip arthroplasty , 2008, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[15]  Olivier Verborgt,et al.  Long-term results of uncemented humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty. , 2007, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[16]  Young-Hoo Kim.  Titanium and Cobalt-Chrome Cementless Femoral Stems of Identical Shape Produce Equal Results , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  T. Gosens,et al.  Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss , 2004, Osteoporosis International.

[18]  M. Thomsen,et al.  Pattern of Periprosthetic Bone Remodeling Around Stable Uncemented Tapered Hip Stems: A prospective 84-month follow-up study and a Median 156-month Cross-Sectional Study with DXA , 2003, Calcified Tissue International.

[19]  Jochem Nagels,et al.  Stress shielding and bone resorption in shoulder arthroplasty. , 2003, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[20]  P. Herberts,et al.  Evaluation of a Femoral Stem with Reduced Stiffness: A Randomized Study with Use of Radiostereometry and Bone Densitometry , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  Michael Tanzer,et al.  Femoral remodeling after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty with and without hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate coating: a prospective randomized trial. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  R. Furlong.  Proximal femoral bone loss and increased rate of fracture with a proximally hydroxyapatite-coated femoral component. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[23]  N. Sugano,et al.  Evaluation of Periprosthetic Bone-Remodeling After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Influence of the Extent of Porous Coating* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  F. Haddad,et al.  Structural proximal femoral allografts for failed total hip replacements: a minimum review of five years. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[25]  C. Engh,et al.  Long-Term Clinical Consequences of Stress-Shielding after Total Hip Arthroplasty without Cement* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  N. Sugano,et al.  Longitudinal Evaluation of Time Related Bone Remodeling After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  T. Arizono,et al.  Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Measurement of Bone Mineral Density around Cementless Femoral Implants , 1995 .

[28]  R. Eberle,et al.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement of bone mineral density around porous-coated cementless femoral implants. Methods and preliminary results. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[29]  B. Kiratli,et al.  Determination of bone mineral density by dual X‐ray absorptiometry in patients with uncemented total hip arthroplasty , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[30]  R. Huiskes,et al.  The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  Engh Ca,et al.  The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. , 1988 .

[32]  C. Engh,et al.  The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.