Diffusion limitation: a possible source for the occurrence of doughnut patterns on DNA microarrays.

Doughnut shaped hybridization patterns on DNA microarrays are mainly allocated to spotting or drying artifacts. The present study reports on results obtained from four different approaches that when combined generate a better view on the occurrence of these patterns. This study points out that doughnuts are not only formed during the spotting and drying process, but the hybridization process itself can be considered as an important cause. A combination of computer simulations, theoretical, optical, and experimental techniques shows how ring-shaped hybridization patterns occur when diffusion-limited conditions are present during the hybridization process. The theoretical assumptions as well as the simulations indicate that, for the basic geometry of a microarray hybridization experiment, a large amount of binding molecules reach the spot from the sides (and not from above the spot), leading to a preferential binding on the rims of the spot. These patterns seem to occur especially during hybridization with short oligonucleotides that have a very high binding probability and fast hybridization kinetics. Longer target DNA molecules lead to a more evenly distributed intensity signal. Furthermore, the diffusion-limited conditions also lead to pronounced hybridization intensity patterns on the scale of a whole spot block, where larger intensities are obtained on the edges of the block compared with the spots laying in the center of the block.

[1]  P. Sheehan,et al.  Detection limits for nanoscale biosensors. , 2005, Nano letters.

[2]  Ralf Blossey,et al.  Contact Line Deposits on cDNA Microarrays: A “Twin-Spot Effect” , 2002 .

[3]  D. Clicq,et al.  Measurements of diffusion coefficients in 1-D micro- and nanochannels using shear-driven flows. , 2005, Lab on a chip.

[4]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[5]  Robert Kincaid,et al.  Comparative genomic hybridization using oligonucleotide microarrays and total genomic DNA. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  László G Puskás,et al.  RNA amplification results in reproducible microarray data with slight ratio bias. , 2002, BioTechniques.

[7]  Robin H. Liu,et al.  Plastic biochannel hybridization devices: a new concept for microfluidic DNA arrays. , 2002, Analytical biochemistry.

[8]  Randall A. Bolanos,et al.  Whole-genome shotgun assembly and comparison of human genome assemblies , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Vincent Y. Jouenne.  Critical Issues in the Processing of cDNA Microarray Images , 2001 .

[10]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Quantitative Monitoring of Gene Expression Patterns with a Complementary DNA Microarray , 1995, Science.

[11]  G. McHale,et al.  Evaporation and the Wetting of a Low-Energy Solid Surface , 1998 .

[12]  T. Dupont,et al.  Capillary flow as the cause of ring stains from dried liquid drops , 1997, Nature.

[13]  G. Desmet,et al.  DNA microarray enhancement using a continuously and discontinuously rotating microchamber. , 2005, Analytical Chemistry.

[14]  J G Krueger,et al.  Molecular classification of psoriasis disease-associated genes through pharmacogenomic expression profiling , 2001, The Pharmacogenomics Journal.

[15]  A. Emili.  Microarrays - Tools for the Genomics Age , 2001 .

[16]  J. Hacia.  Resequencing and mutational analysis using oligonucleotide microarrays , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[17]  S. Dudoit,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING DIFFERENTIALLY EXPRESSED GENES IN REPLICATED cDNA MICROARRAY EXPERIMENTS , 2002 .

[18]  Wing Hung Wong,et al.  Novel mechanisms of T-cell and dendritic cell activation revealed by profiling of psoriasis on the 63,100-element oligonucleotide array. , 2003, Physiological genomics.

[19]  J. Cooper,et al.  Evaluation of three-dimensional microchannel glass biochips for multiplexed nucleic acid fluorescence hybridization assays. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[20]  Achim Wixforth,et al.  Enhancing results of microarray hybridizations through microagitation. , 2003, Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT.

[21]  J. Downing,et al.  Classification of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia by gene expression profiling. , 2003, Blood.

[22]  B. Coombes,et al.  cDNA Array Analysis of Altered Gene Expression in Human Endothelial Cells in Response to Chlamydia pneumoniae Infection , 2001, Infection and Immunity.

[23]  F. Reif,et al.  Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics , 1965 .

[24]  L. Staudt,et al.  Molecular diagnosis of lymphoid malignancies by gene expression profiling. , 2002, Current opinion in hematology.

[25]  A. Bowcock,et al.  Insights into psoriasis and other inflammatory diseases from large-scale gene expression studies. , 2001, Human molecular genetics.

[26]  Frederick R Haselton,et al.  Chaotic mixer improves microarray hybridization. , 2004, Analytical biochemistry.

[27]  Johan Vanderhoeven,et al.  Diffusion–reaction modelling of DNA hybridization kinetics on biochips , 2003 .

[28]  G. Karypis,et al.  Interferon-inducible gene expression signature in peripheral blood cells of patients with severe lupus , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  J. Travers,et al.  Distinct patterns of gene expression in the skin lesions of atopic dermatitis and psoriasis: a gene microarray analysis. , 2003, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.