The Impact of Founders’ Academic Experiences on Linking with Local Alma Maters for Chinese Start-Ups

Are firms founded by alumni and former graduate students more likely to form technology transfer relationships with their alma mater than other firms? Given the importance of engagement with academic institutes, the vast amount of research on entrepreneurship and technology transfer has not yet answered this question. Drawing on previous studies on founder’s academic background and university-industry linkage, we attempt to answer the question in a Chinese metropolitan context. We found that firms whose founding teams have higher proportion of alumni and lower proportion of highly-educated individuals are more likely to form formal ties with the focal local alma mater. The findings have implications on academic entrepreneurs and university officers.

[1]  J. Kimberly,et al.  Issues in the creation of organizations: initiation, innovation, and institutionalization. , 1979, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[2]  Warren Boeker,et al.  Organizational Origins: Entrepreneurial and Environmental Imprinting of the Time of Founding , 1988 .

[3]  R. Gulati.  Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis , 1995 .

[4]  A. Stinchcombe.  Social Structure and Organizations , 2000, Political Organizations.

[5]  Andrew Hall,et al.  Why Research Partnerships Really Matter: Innovation Theory, Institutional Arrangements and Implications for Developing New Technology for the Poor , 2001 .

[6]  James N. Baron,et al.  Labor Pains: Change in Organizational Models and Employee Turnover in Young, High‐Tech Firms1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  Damon J. Phillips.  A Genealogical Approach to Organizational Life Chances: The Parent-Progeny Transfer among Silicon Valley Law Firms, 1946–1996 , 2002 .

[8]  Fiona E. Murray.  Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering , 2002 .

[9]  B. Looy,et al.  Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? , 2004 .

[10]  E. Lazear.  Balanced Skills and Entrepreneurship , 2004 .

[11]  Mari Sako,et al.  Offshoring of Business Services and its Impact on the UK Economy , 2004 .

[12]  Damon J. Phillips.  Organizational Genealogies and the Persistence of Gender Inequality: The Case of Silicon Valley Law Firms , 2005 .

[13]  Monica C. Higgins,et al.  Stacking the Deck: The Effects of Top Management Backgrounds on Investor Decisions , 2006 .

[14]  Christine M. Beckman.  The Influence of Founding Team Company Affiliations on Firm Behavior , 2006 .

[15]  Anne W. Fuller,et al.  Us Faculty Patenting: Inside and Outside the University , 2007 .

[16]  Jeannette A. Colyvas.  From divergent meanings to common practices: The early institutionalization of technology transfer in the life sciences at Stanford University , 2007 .

[17]  Rna Rudi Bekkers,et al.  Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? , 2008 .

[18]  Kathrin Müller,et al.  University Spin-Off's Transfer Speed - Analyzing the Time from Leaving University to Venture , 2010 .

[19]  M. Woerter,et al.  University-industry knowledge and technology transfer in Switzerland: What university scientists think about co-operation with private enterprises , 2008 .

[20]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Intercommunity relationships and community growth in China's high technology industries 1988-2000 , 2009, Strategic Management Journal.

[21]  Aaron K. Chatterji,et al.  Spawned with a silver spoon? Entrepreneurial performance and innovation in the medical device industry , 2009 .

[22]  David Kirsch,et al.  Form or Substance: The Role of Business Plans in Venture Capital Decision Making , 2009 .

[23]  Alice Lam,et al.  What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: ‘Gold’, ‘ribbon’ or ‘puzzle’? , 2011 .

[24]  Olivier Debande,et al.  Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: An empirical analysis , 2010 .

[25]  Ethan R. Mollick.  In the Blood: Organizational History and the Heritability of New Venture Performance , 2010 .

[26]  E. Giuliani,et al.  Who are the researchers that are collaborating with industry? An analysis of the wine sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy , 2010 .

[27]  Christoph Grimpe,et al.  Informal university technology transfer: a comparison between the United States and Germany , 2010 .

[28]  Boo-Young Eom,et al.  Determinants of industry–academy linkages and, their impact on firm performance: The case of Korea as a latecomer in knowledge industrialization☆ , 2010 .

[29]  M. Perkmann,et al.  Engaging Excellence? Effects of Faculty Quality on University Engagement with Industry , 2010 .

[30]  Jiang Yu,et al.  Developing effective strategies to address complex challenges: evidence from local high-tech firms in China , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[31]  Waverly W. Ding.  The Impact of Founders’ Professional Education Background on the Adoption of Open Science by For-Profit Biotechnology Firms , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[32]  Evan Rawley,et al.  Inherited Agglomeration Effects in Hedge Funds , 2011 .

[33]  Masatoshi Kato,et al.  Determinants of R&D cooperation in Japanese start-ups , 2011 .

[34]  Jeannette A. Colyvas,et al.  Breaking the Ivory Tower: Academic Entrepreneurship in the Life Sciences in UK and Germany , 2011 .

[35]  Jian Chen,et al.  The determinants of the choice of innovation source for Chinese firms , 2011, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[36]  Evila Piva,et al.  Firms’ genetic characteristics and competence-enlarging strategies: A comparison between academic and non-academic high-tech start-ups , 2012 .

[37]  Thomas B. Astebro,et al.  Startups by Recent University Graduates and their Faculty - Implications for University Entrepreneurship Policy , 2011 .