Psychological and Physical Stress in Surgeons Operating in a Standard or Modern Operating Room

Purpose There have been no studies examining the effect of optimized ergonomic and technical environment on the psychological and physiological stress of the surgeon. The aim of this study was to examine whether optimized ergonomics and technical aids within a modern operating room (OR) affect psychological and physiological stress in experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Methods This was a prospective case-controlled study including 10 experienced surgeons. Surgery was performed in 2 different ORs: a standard room and a modern room (OR1-suite, Karl Storz). The surgeons filled out questionnaires concerning physical and psychological wellbeing before and after surgery and had their heart rate variability registered during surgery. Results Preoperative to postoperative physical strain and pain measurements revealed a systematical difference with 14 of 15 parameters favoring the modern OR. Two of these parameters reached statistical significance. We did not find any significant differences in the subjective parameters of surgeon satisfaction or the measured heart rate variability parameters. Conclusions Physical strain on the surgeon was reduced when performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a modern OR compared with a standard room.

[1]  T. Vanitallie,et al.  Stress: a risk factor for serious illness. , 2002, Metabolism: clinical and experimental.

[2]  I. Broeders,et al.  Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[3]  H. Maeta,et al.  Heart Rate Variability for Evaluating Surgical Stress and Development of Postoperative Complications , 2008, Clinical and experimental hypertension.

[4]  F. Dubois,et al.  Cholécystectomie par coelioscopie , 1989 .

[5]  O. Latifoğlu,et al.  Plastic Surgeon’s Life: Marvelous for Mind, Exhausting for Body , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  A. Folsom,et al.  Low Heart Rate Variability in a 2-Minute Rhythm Strip Predicts Risk of Coronary Heart Disease and Mortality From Several Causes: The ARIC Study , 2000, Circulation.

[7]  Warren D. Smith,et al.  An ergonomic comparison of robotic and laparoscopic technique: the influence of surgeon experience and task complexity. , 2003, The Journal of surgical research.

[8]  F. Dubois,et al.  Coelioscopic cholecystectomy: Experience with 2006 cases , 1995, World Journal of Surgery.

[9]  B. Abadie.  Effect of Viewing the RPE Scale on the Ability to Make Ratings of Perceived Exertion , 1996, Perceptual and motor skills.

[10]  Warren D. Smith,et al.  Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.

[11]  A. Malliani,et al.  Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use , 1996 .

[12]  F. Dubois,et al.  [Cholecystectomy by coelioscopy]. , 1989, Presse medicale.

[13]  Wolfgang Schwenk,et al.  Stress and heart rate variability in surgeons during a 24-hour shift. , 2008, Archives of surgery.

[14]  G. Borg.  Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. , 1982, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[15]  C. Giebmeyer,et al.  Monitor position in laparoscopic surgery , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[16]  Hubertus Feussner,et al.  Ergonomic assessment of the static stress confronted by surgeons during laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[17]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. , 1996 .

[18]  B. Böhm,et al.  A prospective randomized trial on heart rate variability of the surgical team during laparoscopic and conventional sigmoid resection. , 2001, Archives of surgery.