Spatio-motor cueing in unilateral left neglect: The role of hemispace, hand and motor activation

Reported beneficial effects of left arm activation on neglect are experimentally examined. The present study of a subject with left visual neglect compared left hand finger movement with an instruction to visually anchor perception on the left arm during letter cancellation. Only the finger movements significantly reduced neglect. Another comparison was between "out of sight" finger movements of the left hand in left and right hemispace, respectively. Only left hemispace "blind" finger movements significantly reduced neglect compared to the standard condition. Thirdly, blind left finger movements in left hemispace were compared with passive visual cueing (reading a changing number) and again it was found that only the finger movements reduced neglect. Finally, right finger movements in left hemispace were compared with left finger movements in left hemispace: only the latter reduced neglect. The implications of these findings for theory and therapy of neglect are discussed.

[1]  R. Tegnér,et al.  Through a looking glass. A new technique to demonstrate directional hypokinesia in unilateral neglect. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  J. Paillard.  Motor and representational framing of space , 1991 .

[3]  J. Marshall,et al.  Laterality of motor response in visuo-spatial neglect: A case study , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neglect as a neural representation deficit. , 1990, Revue neurologique.

[5]  K. Heilman,et al.  Attentional factors in the occurrence of stimulus-response compatibility effects , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  I. Robertson,et al.  Spatiomotor cueing in unilateral left neglect: three case studies of its therapeutic effects. , 1992, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[7]  K M Heilman,et al.  Directional hypokinesia and hemispatial inattention in neglect. , 1990, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Must egocentric and environmental frames of reference be aligned to produce spatial S-R compatibility effects? , 1984 .

[9]  Yves Joanette,et al.  Pointing with left vs right hand in left visual field neglect , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  J. Marshall,et al.  Hemispheric activation vs spatio-motor cueing in visual neglect: A case study , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  Kenneth M. Heilman,et al.  Hemispace and Hemispatial Neglect , 1987 .

[12]  J. Marshall,et al.  Left neglect for near but not far space in man , 1991, Nature.

[13]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neural Circuits for Spatial Attention and Unilateral Neglect , 1987 .

[14]  Y. Joanette,et al.  Visual allesthesia in manual pointing: Some evidence for a sensorimotor cerebral organization , 1984, Brain and Cognition.

[15]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Reactions toward the stimulus source: analysis of correct responses and errors over a five-day period. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.