Mechanical Evaluation of Various External Skeletal Fixator–Intramedullary Pin Tie-in Configurations Using a Tubular Plastic Bone Model

Abstract Use of external skeletal fixator–intramedullary pin tie-in (ESF-IM pin tie-in) fixators is an adjustable and effective method of fracture fixation in birds. The objective of this study was to evaluate the elements of the ESF-IM tie-in configuration used in birds. Ten variations of constructs were applied to a plastic bone model with a standard gap. Variants included non-tied and tie-in configurations, use of a 6- or 10-mm acrylic bar or a thermoplastic connecting bar, variation in the placement of the proximal fixation pin, use of 1.1-mm (0.045-in) or 1.6-mm (0.062-in) fixation pins, and configurations of 2, 3, or 4 fixation pins. The various constructs were loaded in bending, torque, and compression, and response variables were determined from resulting load-displacement curves (stiffness, load at 1-mm displacement). Results showed that, by using the tie-in configuration, increasing the diameter of the acrylic connecting bar, and increasing the diameter or number of fixation pins, each significantly increased the stiffness in all assessments. Placing the fixation pin distally in the proximal bone model segment increased the stiffness in bending, and adding a fixation pin to the distal bone model segment increased the stiffness in torque and bending. These results quantified the relative importance of specific parameters that effect stiffness and safe load of the ESF-IM tie-in construct as applied to a plastic bone fracture model.

[1]  J. Bechtold,et al.  Radiographic evaluation of transverse ulna fractures treated with the intramedullary pin-external skeletal fixator (IM-ESF) tie-in technique in pigeons (Columba livia domestica) , 2004 .

[2]  R. Shahar,et al.  The unilateral external fixator and acrylic connecting bar, combined with I.M pin, for the treatment of tibial fractures , 2002, Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[3]  J. T. Lumeij,et al.  Raptor biomedicine III , 2000 .

[4]  R. Shahar Relative stiffness and stress of type I and type II external fixators: acrylic versus stainless-steel connecting bars--a theoretical approach. , 2000, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[5]  D. Simpson,et al.  Type 1-2 hybrid external fixator with tied-in intramedullary pin for treating comminuted distal humeral fractures in a dog and a cat. , 1999, Australian veterinary journal.

[6]  L Claes,et al.  A method to determine the 3-D stiffness of fracture fixation devices and its application to predict inter-fragmentary movement. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  S. Roe,et al.  Epoxy putty for free-form external skeletal fixators. , 1997, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[8]  G. Flo,et al.  Dissipation of heat during polymerization of acrylics used for external skeletal fixator connecting bars. , 1997, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[9]  D. Aron,et al.  Biologic strategies and a balanced concept for repair of highly comminuted long bone fractures , 1995 .

[10]  J. Bechtold,et al.  Avian Fracture Healing Following Stabilization with Intramedullary Polyglycolic Acid Rods and Cyanoacrylate Adhesive vs. Polypropylene Rods and Polymethylmethacrylate , 1994, Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[11]  C. Patton,et al.  COMPARISON OF BONE HEALING USING POLYDIOXANONE AND STAINLESS STEEL INTRAMEDULLARY PINS IN TRANSVERSE, MIDHUMERAL OSTEOTOMIES IN PIGEONS (COLUMBA LTVIA) , 1994 .

[12]  P. Schwarz,et al.  Mechanical evaluation of half-pin (type 1) external skeletal fixation in combination with a single intramedullary pin. , 1992, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[13]  R. Palmer,et al.  Principles of bone healing and biomechanics of external skeletal fixation. , 1992, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice.

[14]  Okrasinski Eb,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of acrylic external skeletal fixation in dogs and cats. , 1991 .

[15]  D. Aron,et al.  Experimental and Clinical Experience with an IM Pin External Skeletal Fixator Tie-in Configuration , 1991, Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[16]  A. D. Pardo,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of acrylic external skeletal fixation in dogs and cats. , 1991, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[17]  J Kenwright,et al.  Controlled mechanical stimulation in the treatment of tibial fractures. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  J R Davey,et al.  Stability of ten configurations of the Hoffmann external-fixation frame. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  R. A. Bennett,et al.  Comparison of the strength and holding power of 4 pin designs for use with half pin (type I) external skeletal fixation. , 1987, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[20]  J Kenwright,et al.  The influence of induced micromovement upon the healing of experimental tibial fractures. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  E. Chao,et al.  External skeletal fixation of canine tibial osteotomies. Compression compared with no compression. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  A. T. Berman,et al.  The use of the Hickman catheter in orthopaedic infections. Brief note. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  E. Chao,et al.  Comparison of osteotomy healing under external fixation devices with different stiffness characteristics. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  G. Bastiani,et al.  The treatment of fractures with a dynamic axial fixator. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[25]  E. Egger Static Strength Evaluation of Six External Skeletal Fixation Configurations , 1983 .