Digital identity as a platform for improving refugee management

Digital platforms are restructuring how many companies and industries function, including humanitarian organisations that operate in complex environments and serve vulnerable populations. To date, however, there has been limited study of their use in humanitarian and particularly refugee contexts. This paper seeks to address this gap by drawing on the concept of platformisation to study the opportunities and challenges arising from UNHCR's transition from a closed transactional system to an open innovation platform focusing on core processes of identification, value creation and platform governance that are relevant for refugee management and protection. Our empirical study captures the perspectives of the UNHCR, organisational stakeholders and refugees in the world's largest refugee camp in Northern Uganda with regards to UNHCR's strategy towards platform openness. We find that UNHCR's data transformation strategy introduces the potential for increasing institutional value in the form of more effective service delivery to refugees. However, these technological opportunities do not necessarily translate to greater value if they do not mesh with current work practices, incentives and activities of service provider organisations and refugees. Our study helps identify opportunities to address these constraints, primarily through improving understanding of the emergent governance‐related tensions that exist for digital platforms for development and surfacing existing issues of exclusion and vulnerability. We conclude with insights for the broader theorisation of identification platforms and with recommendations for policies and practices that together might help realise the potential value creation introduced through the platformisation of identification systems.

[1]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[2]  K. Sandvik,et al.  UNHCR and the pursuit of international protection: accountability through technology? , 2018 .

[3]  Annemette Kjærgaard,et al.  Who do you think you are? A review of the complex interplay between information systems, identification and identity , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Antonio Cordella,et al.  Renegotiating public value with co-production , 2018 .

[5]  Niccoló Tempini,et al.  Governing PatientsLikeMe: Information Production and Research Through an Open, Distributed, and Data-Based Social Media Network , 2015, Inf. Soc..

[6]  Stefan Larsson,et al.  A Platform Society , 2018 .

[7]  Tony Roberts,et al.  Decolonising Neo-Liberal Innovation: Using the Andean Philosophy of 'Buen Vivir' to Reimagine Innovation Hubs , 2019, ICT4D.

[8]  K. Hampshire,et al.  Linkages between Livelihood Opportunities and Refugee–Host Relations: Learning from the Experiences of Liberian Camp-based Refugees in Ghana , 2008 .

[9]  Richard Jenkins,et al.  Categorization: Identity, Social Process and Epistemology , 2000 .

[10]  Nicola Dell,et al.  Identity at the margins: data justice and refugee experiences with digital identity systems in Lebanon, Jordan, and Uganda , 2020, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[11]  Robert Gorwa,et al.  What is platform governance? , 2019, Information, Communication & Society.

[12]  Katja Lindskov Jacobsen,et al.  Experimentation in humanitarian locations: UNHCR and biometric registration of Afghan refugees , 2015 .

[13]  S. Pasha Developmental Humanitarianism, Resilience and (Dis)empowerment in a Syrian Refugee Camp , 2020 .

[14]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[15]  Elena Parmiggiani,et al.  Platformization of the public sector: Assessing the space of possibility for participation , 2020, PDC.

[16]  Oscar H. Gandy,et al.  Mediated Politics: Dividing Practices: Segmentation and Targeting in the Emerging Public Sphere , 2000 .

[17]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  Ideologies implicated in IT innovation in government: A critical discourse analysis of Mexico's international trade administration , 2019, Inf. Syst. J..

[18]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  The Business of Platforms: Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power , 2019 .

[19]  M. Silva,et al.  GDPR Compliance in SMEs: There is much to be done , 2018, Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management.

[20]  R. Zetter Theorizing the Refugee Humanitarian-development Nexus: A Political-economy Analysis , 2019, Journal of Refugee Studies.

[21]  Jonathan Corpus Ong,et al.  The appearance of accountability: communication technologies and power asymmetries in humanitarian aid and disaster recovery , 2016 .

[22]  R. Zetter Labelling Refugees: Forming and Transforming a Bureaucratic Identity , 1991 .

[23]  K. P. Kallio,et al.  Becoming Refugee in Cairo : The Political in Performativity , 2017 .

[24]  A. Betts,et al.  The Global Governed? , 2020 .

[25]  Linnet Taylor,et al.  Exclusion and inclusion in identification: regulation, displacement and data justice , 2020, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[26]  Katja Kaufmann Navigating a new life: Syrian refugees and their smartphones in Vienna , 2018 .

[27]  K. Weick FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[28]  M. Moore Creating public value : strategic management in government , 1995 .

[29]  Annabelle Gawer,et al.  Platforms, Markets and Innovation: An Introduction , 2009 .

[30]  Maja Janmyr,et al.  Modes of Ordering: Labelling, Classification and Categorization in Lebanon’s Refugee Response , 2018 .

[31]  M. D. Myers,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems: A Reader , 2002 .

[32]  K. P. Kallio,et al.  Refugeeness as political subjectivity: Experiencing the humanitarian border , 2019, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space.

[33]  Thomas L. Huber,et al.  Governance Practices in Platform Ecosystems: Navigating Tensions Between Cocreated Value and Governance Costs , 2017, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Jane Wallace,et al.  Internally Displaced Persons , 2001, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[35]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 1999 .

[36]  Mayuree Yotawut Examining progress in research on public value , 2018 .

[37]  Marc Berg,et al.  The practice of medical technology. , 2003, Sociology of health & illness.

[38]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Effect of Knowledge-Sharing Trajectories on Innovative Outcomes in Temporary Online Crowds , 2016, Inf. Syst. Res..

[39]  Antonio Cordella,et al.  Government as a platform, orchestration, and public value creation: The Italian case , 2019, Gov. Inf. Q..

[40]  Tim Davies,et al.  The State of Open Data: Histories and Horizons , 2019 .

[41]  Annabelle Gawer,et al.  Digital platforms for development: Foundations and research agenda , 2021, Inf. Syst. J..

[42]  Mark Thompson,et al.  ICT, Power, and Developmental Discourse: A Critical Analysis , 2002, Global and Organizational Discourse about Information Technology.

[43]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  Governing nonprofit platform ecosystems – an information platform for refugees , 2017, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[44]  E. Schoemaker,et al.  Between surveillance and recognition: Rethinking digital identity in aid , 2021, Big Data & Society.

[45]  Savita Bailur,et al.  Digital identity for development: The quest for justice and a research agenda , 2021, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[46]  J. Sánchez-Monedero The datafication of borders and management of refugees in the context of Europe , 2018 .