Fully automated segmentation of the left atrium, pulmonary veins, and left atrial appendage from magnetic resonance angiography by joint‐atlas‐optimization

Purpose Atrial fibrillation (AF) originating from the left atrium (LA) and pulmonary veins (PVs) is the most prevalent cardiac electrophysiological disorder. Accurate segmentation and quantification of the LA chamber, PVs, and left atrial appendage (LAA) provides clinically important references for treatment of AF patients. The purpose of this work is to realize objective segmentation of the LA chamber, PVs, and LAA in an accurate and fully automated manner. Methods In this work, we proposed a new approach, named joint‐atlas‐optimization, to segment the LA chamber, PVs, and LAA from magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) images. We formulated the segmentation as a single registration problem between the given image and all N atlas images, instead of N separate registration between the given image and an individual atlas image. Level sets was applied to refine the atlas‐based segmentation. Using the publically available LA benchmark database, we compared the proposed joint‐atlas‐optimization approach to the conventional pairwise atlas approach and evaluated the segmentation performance in terms of Dice index and surface‐to‐surface (S2S) distance to the manual ground truth. Results The proposed joint‐atlas‐optimization method showed systemically improved accuracy and robustness over the pairwise atlas approach. The Dice of LA segmentation using joint‐atlas‐optimization was 0.93 ± 0.04, compared to 0.91 ± 0.04 by the pairwise approach (P < 0.05). The mean S2S distance was 1.52 ± 0.58 mm, compared to 1.83 ± 0.75 mm (P < 0.05). In particular, it produced significantly improved segmentation accuracy of the LAA and PVs, the small distant part in LA geometry that is intrinsically difficult to segment using the conventional pairwise approach. The Dice of PVs segmentation was 0.69 ± 0.16, compared to 0.49 ± 0.15 (P < 0.001). The Dice of LAA segmentation was 0.91 ± 0.03, compared to 0.88 ± 0.05 (P < 0.01). Conclusion The proposed joint‐atlas optimization method can segment the complex LA geometry in a fully automated manner. Compared to the conventional atlas approach in a pairwise manner, our method improves the performance on small distal parts of LA, for example, PVs and LAA, the geometrical and quantitative assessment of which is clinically interesting.