Evaluating the Splintex model for estimating the soil water retention curve for a wide range of soils

Abstract The soil water retention curve (SWRC) describes how much water can be retained and is available for plants in soil under different matric potentials. SWRC plays an essential role in the modeling of soil hydraulic processes and can be estimated with pedotransfer functions (PTFs). Splintex 2.0 is a PTF model developed with a user-friendly computer interface that can estimate soil hydraulic functions' parameters. As opposed to common PTFs that need to be calibrated using empirical data, Splintex 2.0 was based on a semi mechanistic model that translates particle-size distribution data into solid mass fractions and pore-size distribution. The objective in this work was to widely test the performance of Splintex 2.0 against the performance of its previous version (Splintex 1.0) using a database of 1355 samples from various countries. This large number of samples allowed a detailed quantification of the univariate and bivariate probability distributions of the estimated parameters in different hydrogeology, climate, and soil types. The accuracy of Splintex 2.0 was examined by means of linear correlation analysis (r) for random errors and of mean error (ME), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE) for systematic errors. The Splintex 2.0 model overcame the estimation’s discrepancy of SWRCs from its previous version and performed similarly with two other published PTF models. In particular, Splintex 2.0 performed as well as these published PTFs in estimating water content at field capacity over a wide range of soil types. In summary, because of its mechanistic nature, Splintex 2.0 can be an alternative model for estimating SWRC and field capacity in new areas where there is a lack of calibration data.

[1]  M. Durães,et al.  Evaluating pedotransfer functions of the Splintex model , 2018, European Journal of Soil Science.

[2]  Javier Tomasella,et al.  Estimating soil water retention characteristics from limited data in Brazilian Amazonia , 1998 .

[3]  J. Tomasella,et al.  Pedotransfer functions for the estimation of soil water retention in Brazilian soils. , 2000 .

[4]  Y. Pachepsky,et al.  Comparison of soil water retention at field and laboratory scales , 2001 .

[5]  M. Schaap,et al.  Hydrophysical Database for Brazilian Soils (HYBRAS) and Pedotransfer Functions for Water Retention , 2018 .

[6]  Y. Mualem A New Model for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity , 1976 .

[7]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  Comparison of different approaches to the development of pedotransfer functions for water-retention curves , 1999 .

[8]  Quirijn de Jong van Lier,et al.  Pedotransfer functions to estimate water retention parameters of soils in northeastern Brazil , 2013 .

[9]  W. Rawls,et al.  Estimating generalized soil-water characteristics from texture , 1986 .

[10]  Petra Rettberg,et al.  Water retention of selected microorganisms and Martian soil simulants under close to Martian environmental conditions , 2014 .

[11]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  From pedotransfer functions to soil inference systems , 2002 .

[12]  B. Minasny,et al.  Automated soil particle‐size analysis using time of flight distance ranging sensor , 2020 .

[13]  O. Wendroth,et al.  Physical Soil Structure Evaluation based on Hydraulic Energy Functions , 2016 .

[14]  Criteria for the estimation of field capacity and their implications for the bucket type model , 2018, European Journal of Soil Science.

[15]  Quirijn de Jong van Lier,et al.  Field capacity, a valid upper limit of crop available water? , 2017 .

[16]  Robson André Armindo,et al.  Splintex 2.0: A physically-based model to estimate water retention and hydraulic conductivity parameters from soil physical data , 2020, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[17]  Rudiyanto,et al.  A complete soil hydraulic model accounting for capillary and adsorptive water retention, capillary and film conductivity, and hysteresis , 2015 .

[18]  Walter J. Rawls,et al.  Pedotransfer functions: bridging the gap between available basic soil data and missing soil hydraulic characteristics , 2001 .

[19]  Johan Bouma,et al.  Using Soil Survey Data for Quantitative Land Evaluation , 1989 .

[20]  Peter J. Shouse,et al.  Relationship between the Hydraulic Conductivity Function and the Particle‐Size Distribution , 2003 .

[21]  Quirijn de Jong van Lier,et al.  Prediction of winter wheat yield with the SWAP model using pedotransfer functions : An evaluation of sensitivity, parameterization and prediction accuracy , 2015 .

[22]  M. G. Hodnett,et al.  Marked differences between van Genuchten soil water-retention parameters for temperate and tropical soils: a new water-retention pedo-transfer functions developed for tropical soils , 2002 .

[23]  Alternative approach to calculate soil hydraulic-energy-indices and -functions , 2019 .

[24]  Harry Vereecken,et al.  ESTIMATING THE SOIL MOISTURE RETENTION CHARACTERISTIC FROM TEXTURE, BULK DENSITY, AND CARBON CONTENT , 1989 .

[25]  P. T. K. Jacomine,et al.  Funções de pedotransferência para predição da umidade retida a potenciais específicos em solos do estado de Pernambuco , 2002 .

[26]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  POLARIS Soil Properties: 30‐m Probabilistic Maps of Soil Properties Over the Contiguous United States , 2019, Water Resources Research.

[27]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  The neuro-m method for fitting neural network parametric pedotransfer functions , 2002 .

[28]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  The neuro-m method for fitting neural network parametric pedotransfer functions , 2002 .

[29]  M. V. Genuchten,et al.  Using Texture and Other Soil Properties to Predict the Unsaturated Soil Hydraulic Functions , 1988 .

[30]  J. M. Reichert,et al.  Estimation of water retention and availability in soils of Rio Grande do Sul , 2009 .

[31]  M. Schaap,et al.  An Assessment of Pedotransfer Function Performance for the Estimation of Spatial Variability of Key Soil Hydraulic Properties , 2017 .

[32]  M. Schaap,et al.  ROSETTA: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions , 2001 .

[33]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Inverse modeling of unsaturated flow using clusters of soil texture and pedotransfer functions , 2016 .

[34]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[35]  L. A. Richards,et al.  Moisture retention by some irrigated soils as related to soil-moisture tension , 1944 .

[36]  F. Nachtergaele Soil taxonomy—a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys: Second edition, by Soil Survey Staff, 1999, USDA–NRCS, Agriculture Handbook number 436, Hardbound , 2001 .

[37]  Marcel G. Schaap,et al.  Weighted recalibration of the Rosetta pedotransfer model with improved estimates of hydraulic parameter distributions and summary statistics (Rosetta3) , 2017 .

[38]  J. E. F. W. Lima,et al.  Development of pedotransfer functions for estimating water retention curve for tropical soils of the Brazilian savanna , 2014 .

[39]  Alessandra Calegari da Silva,et al.  Utilizing Splintex 2.0 for estimating the soil hydraulic conductivity curve measured with instantaneous profile method , 2020 .

[40]  Jack F. Paris,et al.  A Physicoempirical Model to Predict the Soil Moisture Characteristic from Particle-Size Distribution and Bulk Density Data 1 , 1981 .

[41]  Y. Pachepsky,et al.  Development of pedotransfer functions in soil hydrology , 2004 .

[42]  M. Schaap,et al.  SPLINTEX: A physically-based pedotransfer function for modeling soil hydraulic functions , 2017 .

[43]  Rudiyanto,et al.  Simple functions for describing soil water retention and the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity from saturation to complete dryness , 2020, Journal of Hydrology.

[44]  M. Turek,et al.  Estimation and mapping of field capacity in Brazilian soils , 2020 .

[45]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Game theory interpretation of digital soil mapping convolutional neural networks , 2020, SOIL.

[46]  J. Tomasella,et al.  The water balance of an Amazonian micro‐catchment: the effect of interannual variability of rainfall on hydrological behaviour , 2008 .

[47]  J. Bouma,et al.  Pedotransfer Functions in Earth System Science: Challenges and Perspectives , 2017 .

[48]  R. A. Armindo,et al.  Generalization of the Green–Ampt Theory for Horizontal Infiltration into Homogeneous Soils , 2016 .

[49]  Marcel G. Schaap,et al.  Description of the unsaturated soil hydraulic database UNSODA version 2.0 , 2001 .

[50]  A Non‐Empirical Method for Computing Pore Radii and Soil Water Characteristics from Particle‐Size Distribution , 2015 .

[51]  Gianmario Verona,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities Deconstructed: A Bibliographic Investigation into the Origins, Development, and Future Directions of the Research Domain , 2010 .