How we can measure the non-driving-task engagement in automated driving: Comparing flow experience and workload.

In automated driving, a driver can completely concentrate on non-driving-related tasks (NDRTs). This study investigated the flow experience of a driver who concentrated on NDRTs and tasks that induce mental workload under conditional automation. Participants performed NDRTs under different demand levels: a balanced demand-skill level (fit condition) to induce flow, low-demand level to induce boredom, and high-demand level to induce anxiety. In addition, they performed the additional N-Back task, which artificially induces mental workload. The results showed participants had the longest reaction time when they indicated the highest flow score, and had the longest gaze-on time, road-fixation time, hands-on time, and take-over time under the fit condition. Significant differences were not observed in the driver reaction times in the fit condition and the additional N-Back task, indicating that performing NDRTs that induce a high flow experience could influence driver reaction time similar to performing tasks with a high mental workload.

[1]  Natasha Merat,et al.  How do Drivers Behave in a Highly Automated Car , 2017 .

[2]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Partially Automated Driving as a Fallback Level of High Automation , 2013 .

[3]  A. Basahel.  Effect of physical and mental workload interactions on human attentional resources and performance , 2012 .

[4]  Cathleen T. Connolly.  Attentional Strategies and Their Relationship with Perceived Exertion and Flow , 2007 .

[5]  N A Stanton,et al.  What's skill got to do with it? Vehicle automation and driver mental workload , 2007, Ergonomics.

[6]  W. H. Finch.  Performance of the Roy-Bargmann Stepdown Procedure as a Follow Up to a Significant MANOVA , 2007 .

[7]  John L. Sherry.  Flow and Media Enjoyment , 2004 .

[8]  Victoria A Banks,et al.  Keep the driver in control: Automating automobiles of the future. , 2016, Applied ergonomics.

[9]  Cyriel Diels,et al.  Self-driving carsickness. , 2016, Applied ergonomics.

[10]  Jing Feng,et al.  Age differences in the takeover of vehicle control and engagement in non-driving-related activities in simulated driving with conditional automation. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Utilization of Drivetime – Performing Non-Driving Related Tasks While Driving Highly Automated , 2015 .

[12]  Regina Vollmeyer,et al.  Die Erfassung des Flow-Erlebens , 2003 .

[13]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple resources and performance prediction , 2002 .

[14]  Stefanie Ringelhan,et al.  Does skills–demands compatibility result in intrinsic motivation? Experimental test of a basic notion proposed in the theory of flow-experiences , 2011 .

[15]  Regina Vollmeyer,et al.  Flow bei der Arbeit, doch Glück in der Freizeit , 2007 .

[16]  Glenn Gamst,et al.  Applied Multivariate Research: Design and Interpretation , 2005 .

[17]  Katsuya Matsunaga,et al.  Differences of drivers' reaction times according to age and mental workload. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Highly Automated Driving, Secondary Task Performance, and Driver State , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[19]  Stéphane Champely,et al.  Effects of Age and Task Load on Drivers’ Response Accuracy and Reaction Time When Responding to Traffic Lights , 2016, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[20]  Normand Teasdale,et al.  Mental workload when driving in a simulator: effects of age and driving complexity. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Transition to manual: driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle , 2014 .

[22]  S. Engeser,et al.  Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance , 2008 .

[23]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence , 2014 .

[24]  Stefan Engeser,et al.  Advances in Flow Research , 2012 .

[25]  Edward M. Hitchcock,et al.  Active and passive fatigue in simulated driving: discriminating styles of workload regulation and their safety impacts. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[26]  Cathleen A. Towey.  Flow: The Benefits of Pleasure Reading and Tapping Readers' Interests , 2000 .

[27]  Neville Moray,et al.  Models and Measures of Mental Workload , 1979 .

[28]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Control Task Substitution in Semiautomated Driving , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[29]  Jeff Mcquillan,et al.  THE CONDITIONS OF FLOW IN READING: TWO STUDIES OF OPTIMAL EXPERIENCE , 1996 .

[30]  F. Rheinberg,et al.  Flow-Erleben in einem Computerspiel unter experimentell variierten Bedingungen , 2003 .

[31]  Regina Vollmeyer,et al.  Understanding the psychophysiology of flow: A driving simulator experiment to investigate the relationship between flow and heart rate variability , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  Kathrin Zeeb,et al.  What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[33]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience in work and leisure. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Kathrin Zeeb,et al.  Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[35]  M R Endsley,et al.  Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[36]  Giovanni B. Moneta,et al.  On the Measurement and Conceptualization of Flow , 2012 .

[37]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Taking Over Control from Highly Automated Vehicles , 2014 .

[38]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Beyond boredom and anxiety , 1975 .

[39]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Taking the load off: investigations of how adaptive cruise control affects mental workload , 2004, Ergonomics.

[40]  Dick de Waard,et al.  Behavioural impacts of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems–an overview , 2019, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[41]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple Resources and Mental Workload , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[42]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[43]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  How Traffic Situations and Non-Driving Related Tasks Affect the Take-Over Quality in Highly Automated Driving , 2014 .

[44]  Alexandra Neukum,et al.  Secondary task engagement and vehicle automation - comparing the effects of different automation levels in an on-road experiment , 2016 .

[45]  J. Schüler,et al.  Achievement incentives determine the effects of achievement-motive incongruence on flow experience , 2010 .

[46]  Alan Kennedy,et al.  Book Review: Eye Tracking: A Comprehensive Guide to Methods and Measures , 2016, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[47]  David Shinar,et al.  Effects of practice, age, and task demands, on interference from a phone task while driving. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.