Sources of competitiveness for secondary wood products firms : A review of literature and research issues

More than 1 million U.S. workers in some 45,000 firms are employed in the lumber, wood products, furniture, and fixture industries. Wood household and office furniture (SIC 251 and 252) are the largest manufacturing segments, adding $13.851 billion per year to raw product value. During the 1980s, U.S. furniture manufacturers lost sizeable market share to Pacific Rim countries. To improve their performance in increasingly global markets, U.S. manufacturers must have a clear understanding of how to assess their competitive position and how to affect its strategic determinants. This paper reviews existing information on the performance of the U.S. secondary wood products industry and summarizes current models regarding competitiveness and its sources. A review of the literature suggests that both intemal firm processes and external market and government policy factors affect firm and industry competitiveness. However, these are rarely linked in a comprehensive analysis. This paper argues that in order to better understand the factors affecting global competitiveness in this industry, research is needed that combines engineering and economic analyses of competitiveness.

[1]  P. O'farrell,et al.  The Regional Extent of Computer Numerically Controlled (CNC) Machine Tool Adoption and Post Adoption Success in Small British Mechanical Engineering Firms , 1992 .

[2]  Cynthia D. West,et al.  A Measure of Innovativeness for a Sample of Firms in the Wood Household Furniture Industry , 1992 .

[3]  C. Pratten The competitiveness of small firms , 1991 .

[4]  R. Westgren,et al.  Agribusiness Competitiveness across National Boundaries , 1991 .

[5]  S. U. Rich Recent shifts in competitive strategies in the U.S. forest products industry and the increased importance of key marketing functions , 1986 .

[6]  S. Sonka,et al.  Information Technology, Coordination, and Competitiveness in the Food and Agribusiness Sector , 1991 .

[7]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  The strategic advantages of new manufacturing technologies for small firms , 1987 .

[8]  N. Capon,et al.  Marketing and Technology: A Strategic Coalignment , 1987 .

[9]  S. H. Bullard,et al.  Substitution among capital, labor, and raw materials in upholstered household furniture manufacturing , 1993 .

[10]  William R. King,et al.  Do organizations achieve their objectives from computer-based manufacturing technologies? , 1992 .

[11]  P. Mcnulty,et al.  Economic Theory and the Meaning of Competition , 1968 .

[12]  Joseph Moses Juran Juran on Quality by Design: The New Steps for Planning Quality into Goods and Services , 1992 .

[13]  F. Cubbage,et al.  Southern Appalachian hardwood lumber manufacturers : characteristics of exporters and nonexporters , 1991 .

[14]  S. Cavusgil ORGANIZATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS ASSOCIATED WITH EXPORT ACTIVITY , 1984 .

[15]  Wickham Skinner,et al.  Operations Technology: Blind Spot in Strategic Management , 1984 .

[16]  C. D. West,et al.  A cross-national investigation of competitive factors affecting the United States wood furniture industry. , 1990 .

[17]  R. Bush,et al.  A Multivariate Model and Analysis of Competitive Strategy in the U.S. Hardwood Lumber Industry , 1991 .

[18]  Krishnaswami Srihari,et al.  Macro-capp: A prototype capp system for an FMS , 1990 .

[19]  J. Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[20]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[21]  S. Reid,et al.  The Decision-Maker and Export Entry and Expansion , 1981 .