Intrinsic reinforcing properties of putatively neutral stimuli in an instrumental two-lever discrimination task

Four experiments examined the influence of a stimulus presented after one response in a two-lever choice task. In Experiment 1, food-deprived rats trained on a concurrent variable-interval extinction schedule responded more often on the extinction lever when such responding periodically produced a visual stimulus than when it did not. In Experiments 2 and 3, a similar signal-induced enhancement effect was found even when food was delivered randomly with respect to responding on both levers or when no food was presented. In Experiment 4, a response-contingent visual stimulus elevated responding to the lever on which it was presented, but an auditory cue suppressed responding. These findings indicate that visual stimuli may possess intrinsically reinforcing properties for rats.

[1]  B. Skinner.  Superstition in the pigeon. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  G. Grice.  The relation of secondary reinforcement to delayed reward in visual discrimination learning. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  G. B. Kish.  Learning when the onset of illumination is used as reinforcing stimulus. , 1955, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[4]  N H Azrin,et al.  Some Effects of Noise on Human Behavior. , 1958, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  P. Glow,et al.  Some effects of short-term immediate prior exposure to light change on responding for light change , 1974 .

[6]  D. A. Lieberman,et al.  Learning when reward is delayed: a marking hypothesis. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[7]  A. Winefield,et al.  Active versus passive control in sensory contingent bar pressing in rats. , 1980, The Journal of general psychology.

[8]  D. A. Lieberman,et al.  Marking in pigeons: The role of memory in delayed reinforcement. , 1985 .

[9]  R. Bolles,et al.  Differential outcome effect using a biologically neutral outcome difference. , 1986 .

[10]  D. A. Lieberman,et al.  Marking, Memory and Superstition in the Pigeon , 1986 .

[11]  Potentiation of responding on a VR schedule by a stimulus correlated with reinforcement: Effects of diffuse and localized signals , 1988 .

[12]  Blocking of the response-reinforcer association: Additional evidence☆ , 1990 .

[13]  D. A. Lieberman,et al.  The Effects of Relative Intensity of Cue and Marker on Marked Trace Conditioning in Pigeons , 1990 .

[14]  Signalled delay of reward: Overshadowing versus sign-tracking explanations , 1992 .

[15]  Differential Outcome Effect Does Not Control Performance in a Two-Choice Discrimination Task with Visual Stimuli , 1993 .