Qualia: The Geometry of Integrated Information

According to the integrated information theory, the quantity of consciousness is the amount of integrated information generated by a complex of elements, and the quality of experience is specified by the informational relationships it generates. This paper outlines a framework for characterizing the informational relationships generated by such systems. Qualia space (Q) is a space having an axis for each possible state (activity pattern) of a complex. Within Q, each submechanism specifies a point corresponding to a repertoire of system states. Arrows between repertoires in Q define informational relationships. Together, these arrows specify a quale—a shape that completely and univocally characterizes the quality of a conscious experience. Φ— the height of this shape—is the quantity of consciousness associated with the experience. Entanglement measures how irreducible informational relationships are to their component relationships, specifying concepts and modes. Several corollaries follow from these premises. The quale is determined by both the mechanism and state of the system. Thus, two different systems having identical activity patterns may generate different qualia. Conversely, the same quale may be generated by two systems that differ in both activity and connectivity. Both active and inactive elements specify a quale, but elements that are inactivated do not. Also, the activation of an element affects experience by changing the shape of the quale. The subdivision of experience into modalities and submodalities corresponds to subshapes in Q. In principle, different aspects of experience may be classified as different shapes in Q, and the similarity between experiences reduces to similarities between shapes. Finally, specific qualities, such as the “redness” of red, while generated by a local mechanism, cannot be reduced to it, but require considering the entire quale. Ultimately, the present framework may offer a principled way for translating qualitative properties of experience into mathematics.

[1]  A. F..  Foundations of Physics , 1936, Nature.

[2]  F. Attneave.  Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[3]  E. Jaynes.  Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics , 1957 .

[4]  R. Sperry.  Cerebral Organization and Behavior: The split brain behaves in many respects like two separate brains, providing new research possibilities. , 1961, Science.

[5]  W. Rudin.  Real and complex analysis , 1968 .

[6]  S. Lane.  Categories for the Working Mathematician , 1971 .

[7]  G. Bateson,et al.  Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity , 1979 .

[8]  H. Barlow.  Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information: David Marr. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1982. pp. xvi + 397 , 1983 .

[9]  D. Hubel,et al.  Anatomy and physiology of a color system in the primate visual cortex , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  R. Sperry.  Consciousness, personal identity and the divided brain , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  E. Jaynes.  Entropy and Search Theory , 1985 .

[12]  C. R. Smith,et al.  Maximum-Entropy and Bayesian Methods in Inverse Problems , 1985 .

[13]  R. Stanley.  What Is Enumerative Combinatorics , 1986 .

[14]  Brian A. Davey,et al.  An Introduction to Lattices and Order , 1989 .

[15]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[16]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[17]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  G. Edelman,et al.  A measure for brain complexity: relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  G Tononi,et al.  A complexity measure for selective matching of signals by the brain. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  C. Rovelli,et al.  Relational Quantum Mechanics , 2006 .

[21]  M. Plenio,et al.  Quantifying Entanglement , 1997, quant-ph/9702027.

[22]  S Edelman,et al.  Representation is representation of similarities , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  P. Churchland.  Conceptual similarity across sensory and neural diversity : The Fodor/Lepore challenge answered , 1998 .

[24]  Michael I. Jordan.  Graphical Models , 2003 .

[25]  G Tononi,et al.  Measures of degeneracy and redundancy in biological networks. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  S. Palmer,et al.  Color, consciousness, and the isomorphism constraint , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[27]  T. Poggio,et al.  Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  Anthony Randal McIntosh,et al.  Towards a network theory of cognition , 2000, Neural Networks.

[29]  Garrison W. Cottrell,et al.  Content and cluster analysis: Assessing representational similarity in neural systems , 2000 .

[30]  Shun-ichi Amari,et al.  Methods of information geometry , 2000 .

[31]  J. Pearl.  Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[32]  J. Driver,et al.  Perceptual awareness and its loss in unilateral neglect and extinction , 2001, Cognition.

[33]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[34]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework , 2001, Cognition.

[35]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: “Category-specific” neuropsychological deficits , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[36]  Shun-ichi Amari,et al.  Information geometry on hierarchy of probability distributions , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[37]  Shun-ichi Amari,et al.  Information-Geometric Measure for Neural Spikes , 2002, Neural Computation.

[38]  Karl J. Friston.  Learning and inference in the brain , 2003, Neural Networks.

[39]  A. McIntosh,et al.  Functional Connectivity of the Medial Temporal Lobe Relates to Learning and Awareness , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  J. Feldman.  A catalog of Boolean concepts , 2003 .

[41]  Tai Sing Lee,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[42]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[43]  C. Koch,et al.  A framework for consciousness , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  G. Tononi.  An information integration theory of consciousness , 2004, BMC Neuroscience.

[45]  Karl J. Friston.  Models of brain function in neuroimaging. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[46]  C. Koch,et al.  Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain , 2005, Nature.

[47]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Review TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.7 July 2006 Special Issue: Probabilistic models of cognition Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control , 2022 .

[48]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A free energy principle for the brain , 2006, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[49]  C. Rovelli,et al.  Relational EPR , 2006, quant-ph/0604064.

[50]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Mapping Information Flow in Sensorimotor Networks , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[51]  N. Ay,et al.  A UNIFYING FRAMEWORK FOR COMPLEXITY MEASURES OF FINITE SYSTEMS , 2006 .

[52]  E. Haan,et al.  Developmental Colour Agnosia , 2007, Cortex.

[53]  Lawrence A. Shapiro.  Multiple Realizations , 2007 .

[54]  Giulio Tononi,et al.  Integrated Information in Discrete Dynamical Systems: Motivation and Theoretical Framework , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[55]  Karl J. Friston.  Hierarchical Models in the Brain , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[56]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling of induced responses , 2008, NeuroImage.

[57]  David J. Chalmers,et al.  Two-dimensional semantics , 2008 .

[58]  A. Koeppen.  Plum and Posner's Diagnosis of Stupor and Coma, Fourth edition, J.B. Posner, C.F. Saper, N.D. Schiff, F Plum. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York (2007), ISBN 978-0-19-532131-1, 401 pages, US$ 79.50 , 2008 .

[59]  A. Lutz,et al.  Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[60]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling , 2010, Scholarpedia.

[61]  R. Stanley.  Enumerative Combinatorics: Volume 1 , 2011 .